Notices
1983 - 2012 Ranger & B-Series All Ford Ranger and Mazda B-Series models

2003 Ranger Fx4 Level II

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 28, 2004 | 08:35 PM
  #1  
bjolie's Avatar
bjolie
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
From: Sanford ME
2003 Ranger Fx4 Level II

I am looking for some advice....
I currently have a 98 3.0L 4X4 extended cab and have around 117k miles on it. Recently I have had to put some work in it and now it needs some more....however, I am not sure I want to continue this trend.
I was looking around tonight and happened to find a leftover 2003 Ranger FX4 Level II for 19k, brand new from the dealer. My question is this...should I go for this or is this a bad move?

Any advice or experience with this (2003) ranger is appreciated...

Brian J
___________________________
1998 Ranger 3.0L 4X4 Extended Cab
 
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2004 | 09:12 PM
  #2  
WXboy's Avatar
WXboy
Logistics Pro
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,410
Likes: 1,015
From: Central KY
I think it would be an excellent buy personally. I wish I had waited longer myself. Maybe I could have saved some money.
 
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2004 | 11:05 AM
  #3  
bcjim's Avatar
bcjim
Posting Guru
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 1
19K, wow thats cheap. I almost bought one 6 months ago for 21K and I thought that was pretty good..
 
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2004 | 06:11 PM
  #4  
bjolie's Avatar
bjolie
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
From: Sanford ME
...$19095 to be exact. I made the decision and picked it up today....goodbye to the old 98 (no tears over losing the PVH's) and hello to the 2003. Love this truck already, can't beleive what a difference there is between the 3.0L and the 4.0L!

~Brian J
 
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2004 | 06:12 PM
  #5  
WXboy's Avatar
WXboy
Logistics Pro
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,410
Likes: 1,015
From: Central KY
Congrats! Yup, a lot more power, same gas mileage, and no more hubs going bad ever again!! Ain't it great?
 
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2004 | 08:29 PM
  #6  
bjolie's Avatar
bjolie
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
From: Sanford ME
...am I mistaken or did you get those 32" MT's on your truck without a lift?
 
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2004 | 08:34 PM
  #7  
Rockledge's Avatar
Rockledge
Post Fiend
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,748
Likes: 16
From: Connecticut
Congratulations on the new Ranger!
 
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2004 | 08:39 PM
  #8  
bjolie's Avatar
bjolie
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
From: Sanford ME
thanks Rockledge!
 
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2004 | 09:36 PM
  #9  
WXboy's Avatar
WXboy
Logistics Pro
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,410
Likes: 1,015
From: Central KY
You aren't mistaken. The OEM tires sucked, so I corrected Ford's mistake for them. Now my truck is like a tank. It'll go almost anywhere. No lift whatsoever. But I'm going back to factory diameter when these wear out. Maybe a wider tire, but back to factory diameter. These put too much strain on the brakes, and hurt fuel economy too.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
butch aus
1983 - 2012 Ranger & B-Series
5
Apr 11, 2014 11:23 AM
Drakhiei
1983 - 2012 Ranger & B-Series
10
Feb 9, 2011 09:48 AM
Brilac
Engine Swaps
4
Feb 7, 2006 06:58 PM
dchann
1983 - 2012 Ranger & B-Series
8
Mar 2, 2005 01:07 AM
B C fx4 Level II
Oil & Lubrication
45
Dec 23, 2003 06:58 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:25 AM.