When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Did you not read the definition of quench being "the distance between the piston and the cylinder head combustion chamber"?
EVERY engine / piston / combustion chamber has quench
You are arguing with a master
I know what all of those heads look like and have owned them. A head needs a flat area to provide quench and a piston to match. Otherrwise you don't get any squish into the reduced area. You don't appear to be a master too me.a little too full of yourself.
For those intereested in the definition of "quench" and what it means this is good. Open chamber head cannot apply quench unless youv'e got some king of popup pistons.
I know what all of those heads look like and have owned them. A head needs a flat area to provide quench and a piston to match. Otherrwise you don't get any squish into the reduced area. You don't appear to be a master too me.a little too full of yourself.
More like sure of myself
You appear to be part moron
I got my Ford masters cert in 1998 and have been doing this all my life
The broad and shallow Cleveland chambers, resulting from the low valve angles, are superior to wedge chambers. Open chamber versions of the Cleveland head obviously have no quench areas to shield any portion of the combustion chamber from the flame front. There isn't enough quench area to make a detrimental impact upon horsepower in the quench chamber versions of the Cleveland cylinder head either; no part of the combustion area is significantly hidden from the flame front, minimizing quench clearance is not needed to expose otherwise unburned air/fuel mixture. The Cleveland cylinder head creates turbulence within the combustion chamber by virtue of the chamber's shallowness. I know from experience the open chamber heads resist detonation equally as well as the quench chamber heads, both versions can operate at the same compression ratios.
Open chamber heads still have a quench area (defined as piston to head area)
Zero deck height is a doable thing for a racing engine
Big problems in a street motor IMO with piston to valve clearance
Not so much of a problem with a Ford 400, and those motors sure do benefit with more compression
Ran stock steel shim head gaskets in my '69 302 Chev forever (came stock with steel shim head gaskets)
Sucked a few valves over the years (broken valve springs) mostly
Should have took a picture of the sucked valve in my 69 Z-28 when I put 2.05 turbo angle plug fuelie heads on it
Live and learn
There are no such things as "2.05 turbo angle plug fuelie heads" so it might be a good idea to just shut up because everyone can tell that you know nothing about engines.
1998? I thought you were an old hand, not a young gun
My first recall job for a Ford dealer was a gas tank shield on a Pinto
That was in '79
I was happy to do that job
Nobody else wanted to
They had already done thousands
I taught young apprentices of mine to add fuel line one way valves and I got the time on my flag sheet
That's the other way to make 20 hours a day as a tech
I went back and re-read all of your posts in this thread none were helpful to the thread starter, and some were downright inaccurate. We don't care what you did for a living. If you are trying to prove something to us, it ain't working.