Notices
6.7L Power Stroke Diesel 2011-current Ford Powerstroke 6.7 L turbo diesel engine

SPE Fuel Filter System

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 1, 2025 | 08:02 PM
  #16  
WK15's Avatar
WK15
More Turbo
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 740
Likes: 152
From: USA
Jared, I like the fuel drain set-up you have. Can I get a parts list for that!!!! This looks like a must have.

Thank You.
 
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2025 | 08:23 PM
  #17  
dornjmd's Avatar
dornjmd
Thread Starter
|
Cross-Country
Liked
Joined: Feb 2025
Posts: 93
Likes: 24
Originally Posted by WK15
I ran the CAT filters ( Fuel: 1R-0749 and WS: 256-8753 ) that came with the kit for the first 10K. Opened the filters no rust or contaminates found. Then changed over to the Donaldson Filters ( Fuel: P551311 and WS: P551000 ). If I remember correctly the Donaldson's filter better or equal to the Cat Filters. The Donaldson filter you can place a clear fuel bowl ( P569758 ) on the bottom and see any water in the filter. Easy to do a visual before driving. I run this system on my 450. Filters are wrapped by my fuel tank and frame rail.

Jared if you want a shorter Fuel Filter here you go:
  • The 1R-0749 is 10.75" tall and has an outside diameter of 3.75".
  • The 1R-0750 is 7.50" tall and has an outside diameter of 3.38".






wow that is fantastic information. What truck are you running? I’m getting a 25 f250 long bed and from what I’ve seen they still stick down further than your setup. What you have fits nice and snug and depending on the filters may be recessed.

if the Donaldson are just as good I’ll get those just for the clear bowl.

many many thanks!
 
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2025 | 08:29 PM
  #18  
dornjmd's Avatar
dornjmd
Thread Starter
|
Cross-Country
Liked
Joined: Feb 2025
Posts: 93
Likes: 24
Originally Posted by WK15
Jared, I like the fuel drain set-up you have. Can I get a parts list for that!!!! This looks a must have.

Thank You.
this caused me confusion. I don’t even have my truck yet! The build week is theoretical 4/21. This was a picture from the spe website of somebody else’s install but they all look that low.

the part is just their upgraded fuel valve.

SPE-S100275

https://www.spemotorsport.com/collec...-valve-upgrade
 
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2025 | 08:35 PM
  #19  
WK15's Avatar
WK15
More Turbo
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 740
Likes: 152
From: USA
Originally Posted by dornjmd
wow that is fantastic information. What truck are you running? I’m getting a 25 f250 long bed and from what I’ve seen they still stick down further than your setup. What you have fits nice and snug and depending on the filters may be recessed.

if the Donaldson are just as good I’ll get those just for the clear bowl.

many many thanks!

I have a 2017 F450. With the CAT Filters I was about three inches from the bottom of my skid plate. This was with the Big Cat Filters. Even with the Donaldson filters and fuel bowl I'm three inches.

Those pictures you posted seem a bit odd. I didn't think that the CAT 1R-0749 sat that low. This is the lowest I ever seen that filter sit. Normally about three inches short of the skid plate.




 
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2025 | 08:36 PM
  #20  
WK15's Avatar
WK15
More Turbo
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 740
Likes: 152
From: USA
Originally Posted by dornjmd
this caused me confusion. I don’t even have my truck yet! The build week is theoretical 4/21. This was a picture from the spe website of somebody else’s install but they all look that low.

the part is just their upgraded fuel valve.

SPE-S100275

https://www.spemotorsport.com/collec...-valve-upgrade

Oh, Im buying this!!! This was not available when I bought my kit.
 
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2025 | 08:52 PM
  #21  
kayakingpoodle's Avatar
kayakingpoodle
Laughing Gas
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2024
Posts: 838
Likes: 456
From: Up in Texas
The CAT 416-1225 is the same dimensions as the 1R-0749, but the UHE sub 4 micron.
 
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2025 | 09:12 PM
  #22  
WK15's Avatar
WK15
More Turbo
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 740
Likes: 152
From: USA
I went to their website and all the 450s are nice and tucked away. I don't know if the tank size ie.. Fuel capacity is the difference. My fuel tank is 48 gallons.
 
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2025 | 06:55 AM
  #23  
rufushusky's Avatar
rufushusky
Cargo Master
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,657
Likes: 967
From: Walpole, MA
Originally Posted by dornjmd
wow that is fantastic information. What truck are you running? I’m getting a 25 f250 long bed and from what I’ve seen they still stick down further than your setup. What you have fits nice and snug and depending on the filters may be recessed.

if the Donaldson are just as good I’ll get those just for the clear bowl.

many many thanks!
If your really concerned about the filters hanging too low run the 1R0750 for the secondary filter and the 175-2949 as the water separator. Same media as the 1R0749 and 256-8753 but shorter. IIRC the 750 is circa 7 inches compared to the 9-10 of the 749, all use the same 1-14 post.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Apr 2, 2025 | 01:48 PM
  #24  
jollyrogr's Avatar
jollyrogr
Cargo Master
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 2,277
Likes: 949
While I do like the SPE filter kit, I don't see enough benefit to warrant the cost. I think the money would be better used toward a DCR pump.
 
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2025 | 02:45 PM
  #25  
acdii's Avatar
acdii
Lead Driver
Photoriffic
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
Joined: Feb 2022
Posts: 7,955
Likes: 4,039
For the record all long bed 6.7 trucks get the 48 gallon tank and there is no difference between the 250 and 450 setup. The filter location is in the same mid tank location, so it should be well protected. Only the 36 gallon setup has the filter at the front of the tank and fully exposed.

I want further proof that it traps water better than the OEM filter setup before I put that kind of money, and time, in.
 
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2025 | 02:58 PM
  #26  
rufushusky's Avatar
rufushusky
Cargo Master
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,657
Likes: 967
From: Walpole, MA
Originally Posted by acdii
I want further proof that it traps water better than the OEM filter setup before I put that kind of money, and time, in.
From Fass of all people.... the 175-2949 was 97.1% efficient off the hop at 100 GPH, dropped to 94.6% at 165 GPH

https://fassride.com/fass-fuel-filters-versus-competition/?srsltid=AfmBOorZHsm-cwJkZsKQxiT0nk4879sLewShmPh7SW0S4oYG9xn1NSv2

OEM spec is 95% but no specified flow rate


https://parts.ford.com/content/dam/f...el_Filters.pdf

Granted that is the 11-16 fuel filters, I haven't seen anything on the 17+. The Cat should out perform the OEM filter but it is only 2-4% depending on how Ford calculated the 95% for the filter.
 
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2025 | 03:16 PM
  #27  
kayakingpoodle's Avatar
kayakingpoodle
Laughing Gas
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2024
Posts: 838
Likes: 456
From: Up in Texas
Originally Posted by rufushusky
From Fass of all people.... the 175-2949 was 97.1% efficient off the hop at 100 GPH, dropped to 94.6% at 165 GPH

https://fassride.com/fass-fuel-filters-versus-competition/?srsltid=AfmBOorZHsm-cwJkZsKQxiT0nk4879sLewShmPh7SW0S4oYG9xn1NSv2

OEM spec is 95% but no specified flow rate


https://parts.ford.com/content/dam/f...el_Filters.pdf

Granted that is the 11-16 fuel filters, I haven't seen anything on the 17+. The Cat should out perform the OEM filter but it is only 2-4% depending on how Ford calculated the 95% for the filter.
Do they specify if it is free, emulsified, or both for that efficency rating?
 
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2025 | 05:12 PM
  #28  
rufushusky's Avatar
rufushusky
Cargo Master
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,657
Likes: 967
From: Walpole, MA
Originally Posted by kayakingpoodle
Do they specify if it is free, emulsified, or both for that efficency rating?
Ford does not explicitly specify, IIRC (on my phone) the FASS test was emulsified water.
 
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2025 | 05:14 PM
  #29  
kayakingpoodle's Avatar
kayakingpoodle
Laughing Gas
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2024
Posts: 838
Likes: 456
From: Up in Texas
Originally Posted by rufushusky
Ford does not explicitly specify, IIRC (on my phone) the FASS test was emulsified water.
It makes a difference.
 
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2025 | 08:12 AM
  #30  
Overkill2's Avatar
Overkill2
FTE Legend
5 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 31,793
Likes: 9,121
From: Western NY
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by rufushusky
From Fass of all people.... the 175-2949 was 97.1% efficient off the hop at 100 GPH, dropped to 94.6% at 165 GPH

https://fassride.com/fass-fuel-filters-versus-competition/?srsltid=AfmBOorZHsm-cwJkZsKQxiT0nk4879sLewShmPh7SW0S4oYG9xn1NSv2

OEM spec is 95% but no specified flow rate


https://parts.ford.com/content/dam/f...el_Filters.pdf

Granted that is the 11-16 fuel filters, I haven't seen anything on the 17+. The Cat should out perform the OEM filter but it is only 2-4% depending on how Ford calculated the 95% for the filter.
Yeah and Fass uses media that swells in their water separators, made for stationary fuel tank usage, that will shut down the engine due to lack of fuel flow. Not a good thing for a CP4 equipped truck. Unless that's changed but probably not...
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:26 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE