91 idi project
This means that they should go back in very easily, once you have any crud cleaned out.
They really shouldn't just fall out, but I've seen it on the 6.9, 6,2 and on the Volvo Diesels, I just haven't done a lot of 7.3 work other than my own truck.
also with a 150 a intercooler is required if you ever want to be able to use it. I would recomend water meth as well. also if all you are going for is 300 whp a 110cc pump and a 257 turbo will do that. why go for more fuel than you need to accomplish your goal?
I don't think it will transfer too much heat to the upper ring, the pistons have a deep skirt and the oilers underneath to keep em cool. If it gets too hot the piston itself will fail. Although too hot ring temperatures will cause them wear out quicker and scar the cylinder wall.
110cc's is probably plenty if you plan to tow with it. If its just a "fun" truck the 150 would fit the bill although it's a bit in price jump
one running it ran great after it built some boost, but it would not start due to the low compression.
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Part of the problem with valve opening is that there's very little clearance around TDC - like 1/16" of an inch or so. And the piston can follow the valve up within 1/32" or so(.030"). So everything has to be just perfect at that spot on the cam for it to work.
Also, I think if you take too much off the lobe, you lose the case hardening done. The main body of the cam is a ton softer than the lobe surface, which is around 50 HRC(I saw 56 HRC on a stock 6.9 cam, 53hrc on the heel of a R&D, and 50HRC on the heel of a Torque cam. All really good numbers. The body was like... 30HRC?).
Fortunately, our cams use roller lifters and don't wear the lobes like solid lifters do, but still, having good hardness is important for longevity.
I never understood how the regrinds work either, I'm sure Google would tell all though
also with a 150 a intercooler is required if you ever want to be able to use it. I would recomend water meth as well. also if all you are going for is 300 whp a 110cc pump and a 257 turbo will do that. why go for more fuel than you need to accomplish your goal?
Im going to disagree with the compression comments. It will be harder to start, but under normal conditions it will start with the glow plug system. That said, why though? If youre worried about headgaskets, 0-ring the block. I spoke with Justin pretty extensively about cutting my pistons, in short, he advised me against it. Think of compression the same as you would porting, the better it is, the better boost will help it. More compression gives you better under the curve torque, lower egts, spools the turbo faster, easier starting, theres really no downside until you start spitting out gaskets. Which even given the IDIs history, doesnt seem to be much of an issue on the 7.3s with studs.
I would coat the pistons just to keep the heat out of the oil, not worried about the pistons getting too hot. As you guys have already hit on, you cant coat the rings, and thats what will cause problems in the long term running hot.
As far as power and what not. I bought the 364 and psd rods because i wanted a 150, and im going to be pulling a 2 car trailer. I dont want an auto, but short of dropping 2k on a flywheel, a dual disc clutch isnt available, thus the 110. Knowing what i know now, i wouldve bought a 257 and 110cc from the start. Especially as i cant even use all the 110 without my coolant temps getting out of hand. Im very very VERY strongly considering trying to sell my 364 and buying a 257. Then if things change and i go bigger, well, i can always throw a 369 on top of it. The 364 would be great if my gearing wasnt so tall, that said, if i stay with the 110, i dont need the extra airflow, and the extra response would be welcome. Also, i really like the idea of compounds, just because. Do some reading on power driven diesel's towing twins if youre curious, pretty impressive numbers and characteristics. When i moved down here to the valley i got to try a little experiment, i wasnt dissapointed. My 92 out towed my grandparents stock 2011 6.7 psd, not by any runaway margin (and i wouldnt be able to sustain it do to coolant temps) but a win is a win and ill take it.
The consensus, after posting pictures here, is that it was just stress in the rod and it just... failed.
Justins rods, on the other hand, had *all* bent before one finally failed.
I've also gotten a couple of JY motors, one a 6.9 and the other a 7.3, with thrown rods. Not sure what caused them, but obviously not a massive power boost... judging by the IP still on the motor.
So, don't confuse 'normal' failure with 'overload' failure.








