Are They Resurrecting the Excursion???
THINK ABOUT IT- The Excursion was based on the Super Duty pickup and the Expedition was based on the F150 pickup. This was at a time when the SD and 150 were two completely different trucks with bodies unique to each of them. Fast-forward to NOW, where the SD and F150 share the same body structure. The Expedition still borrows heavy from the F150 platform, so a new Excursion would basically be an Expedition with Super Duty-ish front sheet metal, a solid axles, and a 100k price tag. In other words- IT WOULDN'T SELL.
Ford set out to make the baddest-**** SUV when they built the Excursion, but they learned their lesson with it in that the audience was limited (more Chevelles built in 1970 alone than all Excursions combined), it drank too much fuel, the ride was rough (one reason the Expedition has IRS), and more people expected it to be a minivan than do the work it was designed to do. Everything that we die-hard fans love about it would make it a sales disaster today...
BTW. I own and have owned a slew of SD and half tons including Expeditions of most years. Currently with 2 Excursions in my garage. Each has received no less than 375K miles before moving on with the exception of the 2000 Ex that was recently rolled by my son. The Ex was not killed off because of poor ride. Best bet is it was killed over fuel credits. Every Excursion I have ever ridden in from the stockers up to and Including my 2000 with the Pro Comp 4" lift on 35's and my 2002 with the 8" lift on 37's rides WAY better than my 2011 F350 on it's best day. This was never meant to be about opinions. Clearly you have a thing against the big Ex and that's ok. Myself and plenty others I know would buy another. Now that I have expressed MY opinions I will leave this thread.
BTW. I own and have owned a slew of SD and half tons including Expeditions of most years. Currently with 2 Excursions in my garage. Each has received no less than 375K miles before moving on with the exception of the 2000 Ex that was recently rolled by my son. The Ex was not killed off because of poor ride. Best bet is it was killed over fuel credits. Every Excursion I have ever ridden in from the stockers up to and Including my 2000 with the Pro Comp 4" lift on 35's and my 2002 with the 8" lift on 37's rides WAY better than my 2011 F350 on it's best day. This was never meant to be about opinions. Clearly you have a thing against the big Ex and that's ok. Myself and plenty others I know would buy another. Now that I have expressed MY opinions I will leave this thread.
I never said the sole reason the Ex was killed off was because of the ride. The numero uno reason the Ex was killed off was poor sales- sales that declined almost every year. In order for sales to slip, there has to be reasons, and Ford had studied those reasons prior to making the decision to ring the death bell. It couldn't be the styling- Excursion received her minor cosmetic updates right alongside the Super Duty- which didn't see the same decreased sales. It wasn't killed off over fuel credits either- she was mostly exempt at the time due to her weight rating. It's no big secret that the Excursion's suspension was engineered different than her SD bretheren- and that was for two reasons- to make it fit in a garage, and to try to land her in that "better ride" category. The simple fact is, more people were using their Excursions as grocery getters than they were heavy towing and work, and people noticed that the Suburban had a better ride (even though buyers were also walking away from the 2500 Suburban as well). SALES killed the Excursion, but ride quality, along with MPG's and other factors, killed SALES- because the majority of the buying base wanted cushy SUV's more than they wanted a workhorse.
Not to mention, there are thousands of people who can say "I'd buy another one" when one isn't available- when they don't have to put their 100k where their mouth is. Excursion was the king of the hill- so bringing it back would have to have a base price higher than the top-level Expedition. Two solid axles are NEVER going to ride as smooth as today's SUV offerings (and face it, people would complain hard if a new Ex came out with 4-wheel independent suspension). There aren't enough ACTUAL buyers willing to spend that kind of coin on a huge SUV that would still get relatively poor MPG's, if built to the standards of the original. Comparing it to the ride of a heavy duty pickup is apples to oranges, because people expect even the smoothest-riding trucks to ride worse than a plushy SUV- two different vehicles with two different purposes. And the buying public in 2018 are going to reject a brand new SUV that rides like the Excursion did. You forget, people in here aren't the norm when it comes to buying an SUV.
That said, you might consider taking a chill pill. you came into a thread where a future Excursion is being discussed in a civil manner, and the minute you get a response you don't like, you complain about being "pi$$ed," accuse me of hating the very vehicle I spent a year bringing back from the dead, and announce your departure because you stated YOUR opinion and will not accept a disagreement. Come on man, judging by your join date, you've been here long enough to know that's not how FTE flows...
I never said the sole reason the Ex was killed off was because of the ride. The numero uno reason the Ex was killed off was poor sales- sales that declined almost every year. In order for sales to slip, there has to be reasons, and Ford had studied those reasons prior to making the decision to ring the death bell. It couldn't be the styling- Excursion received her minor cosmetic updates right alongside the Super Duty- which didn't see the same decreased sales. It wasn't killed off over fuel credits either- she was mostly exempt at the time due to her weight rating. It's no big secret that the Excursion's suspension was engineered different than her SD bretheren- and that was for two reasons- to make it fit in a garage, and to try to land her in that "better ride" category. The simple fact is, more people were using their Excursions as grocery getters than they were heavy towing and work, and people noticed that the Suburban had a better ride (even though buyers were also walking away from the 2500 Suburban as well). SALES killed the Excursion, but ride quality, along with MPG's and other factors, killed SALES- because the majority of the buying base wanted cushy SUV's more than they wanted a workhorse.
Not to mention, there are thousands of people who can say "I'd buy another one" when one isn't available- when they don't have to put their 100k where their mouth is. Excursion was the king of the hill- so bringing it back would have to have a base price higher than the top-level Expedition. Two solid axles are NEVER going to ride as smooth as today's SUV offerings (and face it, people would complain hard if a new Ex came out with 4-wheel independent suspension). There aren't enough ACTUAL buyers willing to spend that kind of coin on a huge SUV that would still get relatively poor MPG's, if built to the standards of the original. Comparing it to the ride of a heavy duty pickup is apples to oranges, because people expect even the smoothest-riding trucks to ride worse than a plushy SUV- two different vehicles with two different purposes. And the buying public in 2018 are going to reject a brand new SUV that rides like the Excursion did. You forget, people in here aren't the norm when it comes to buying an SUV.
That said, you might consider taking a chill pill. you came into a thread where a future Excursion is being discussed in a civil manner, and the minute you get a response you don't like, you complain about being "pi$$ed," accuse me of hating the very vehicle I spent a year bringing back from the dead, and announce yout
All I can say is "I would be a buyer if it was built on a Superduty platform with a 7.3 engine. My 6.0 that claimed to have a 10% increase in fuel mileage actually dropped from 18 mpg to 16 mpg at best. Also the quite pilot injection is gone. LOL
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
That said, you might consider taking a chill pill. you came into a thread where a future Excursion is being discussed in a civil manner, and the minute you get a response you don't like, you complain about being "pi$$ed," accuse me of hating the very vehicle I spent a year bringing back from the dead, and announce your departure because you stated YOUR opinion and will not accept a disagreement. Come on man, judging by your join date, you've been here long enough to know that's not how FTE flows...
You posted your info, you included the qualifier that you didn't see the sign, yet you're gonna get "pissed off" because someone said nope, the sign isn't accurate? C'mon bro, it's not like that We're not like other places. We can have different points of view here and basically all get along.

I can see a dealership contracting with a body shop to make their own style of CABT Excursion and having a banner displayed to market its arrival while it's being built
Either way bud, take it with a grain of salt, grow some thicker skin, something, because in life, not everyone is going to always agree with you.

Stewart
Last edited by Stewart_H; Oct 31, 2018 at 03:29 PM.










