Notices
2017 - 2022 Super Duty The 2017-2022 Ford F250, F350, F450, F550 & F600 Super Duty Pickup and Chassis Cab
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Arizona DPF delete?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 25, 2018 | 06:15 PM
  #16  
urname7698's Avatar
urname7698
Cross-Country
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 69
Likes: 3
Originally Posted by kd2dwj


okay, I’m going to do the delete.

how can I register in pinal without buying property there? I heard they don’t let you register to PO boxes anymore
Send me a PM if you need a northern AZ address. We live in Yavapai county and have a few other properties too

You also just update your mailing address to be your PHX address or a PO Box so you'll never even have your tags mailed there.
 
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2018 | 07:28 PM
  #17  
TX03RUBI's Avatar
TX03RUBI
Senior User
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by UGA33




If one were going to swap back annually, I would recommend running block off plates as it would keep the exhaust gas off the EGR valve and keep it from "coking" up. Block off plates keep the EGR cooler on the truck. Takes literally 5-10 mins to install them.

If you just run a delete pipe vs a full exhaust, the DPF can be put back on in under an hour easily. Once you do it a couple times, it can be done in 30 mins. Order the sensor plug kit to keep them clean and you can literally be back to stock in under an hour. That time includes the tune back to stock. If you only had to do it once a year, that's easy.
That back plate is notorious for snapping a bolt off. The heat cycles cause it to seize over time. I’d think you’re playing Russian Roullette with 5 loaded cylinders and 1 empty whether or not you’ll snap that bolt after that length of time. I’d sure hate to try and remove a snapped bolt with the EGR in the way as well. It can be done, but I don’t think it’ll be near as easy done as said.
 
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2018 | 07:32 PM
  #18  
TX03RUBI's Avatar
TX03RUBI
Senior User
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Tricon
You wont see a mileage increase btw, maybe .5-1mpg, max.

Itll sound better though...but thats a lot of money to spend for sound. EGR delete, DPF/DEF delete, tuner, etc....all just for sound.
i saw a lot more than 1 mpg difference. Stock I was getting 16-17 mpg at 73-75mph. I then installed 37x12.50 Toyos and dropped to 11-13 on the highway at the same speeds. Ran that way for approx 5-6k miles before deleting. Now I see 15-17 again depending on how heavy my foot is. I just ran a 6k mile roadtrip with a bunch of crap strapped to my truck, and I averaged 15.3 mpg for the whole trip with Hand calculations. Most of that trip I was running 80-85, with occasional stretches of 90.
 
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2018 | 10:18 PM
  #19  
pkarhoff's Avatar
pkarhoff
Trojan Pig
5 Year Member
Liked
Top Answer: 1
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 133
Likes: 88
From: Southern Arizona
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by TX03RUBI


That back plate is notorious for snapping a bolt off. The heat cycles cause it to seize over time. I’d think you’re playing Russian Roullette with 5 loaded cylinders and 1 empty whether or not you’ll snap that bolt after that length of time. I’d sure hate to try and remove a snapped bolt with the EGR in the way as well. It can be done, but I don’t think it’ll be near as easy done as said.
I yanked those damn things out and put Metric 12.9 (metric version of grade 8) in place. They hold perfect and I can pull em as needed without snapping the SOBs.
 
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2018 | 10:22 PM
  #20  
UGA33's Avatar
UGA33
Lead Driver
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,665
Likes: 164
From: Cartersville, Ga
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by TX03RUBI


That back plate is notorious for snapping a bolt off. The heat cycles cause it to seize over time. I’d think you’re playing Russian Roullette with 5 loaded cylinders and 1 empty whether or not you’ll snap that bolt after that length of time. I’d sure hate to try and remove a snapped bolt with the EGR in the way as well. It can be done, but I don’t think it’ll be near as easy done as said.
Been there, done that, have the t-shirt. There are ways to do it without breaking them. Just did a 170k 6.7 last week without issue. If you know you might want to do it, pull em early and put something on em to keep them from freezing up when it comes time to yank em. My method of choice is penetrating oil a few days before hand (Kroil). Had good success with that. If they get tight, Map gas does the trick.
 
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2018 | 09:44 AM
  #21  
TX03RUBI's Avatar
TX03RUBI
Senior User
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by UGA33


Been there, done that, have the t-shirt. There are ways to do it without breaking them. Just did a 170k 6.7 last week without issue. If you know you might want to do it, pull em early and put something on em to keep them from freezing up when it comes time to yank em. My method of choice is penetrating oil a few days before hand (Kroil). Had good success with that. If they get tight, Map gas does the trick.
good to know. If I’m ever in that predicament again I’ll give it a try.
 
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2018 | 11:52 AM
  #22  
UGA33's Avatar
UGA33
Lead Driver
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,665
Likes: 164
From: Cartersville, Ga
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by TX03RUBI


good to know. If I’m ever in that predicament again I’ll give it a try.
Sucks having to tear the top end of the engine off to replace the manifold when you snap the bolt off then break the easy out off in it too. Sucks
 
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2018 | 12:59 PM
  #23  
pkarhoff's Avatar
pkarhoff
Trojan Pig
5 Year Member
Liked
Top Answer: 1
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 133
Likes: 88
From: Southern Arizona
Club FTE Gold Member
50/50 Acetone and Mercron work well for these damn things too; mixing them is like getting Democrats and Republicans to agree, but once done it works. Over a couple days put the pen oil on and then run the engine. On the day you want to remove, remove while the engine is hot. The hotter you can stand the better as the CGI expands much more than the bolts do so they back out easier.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-2

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-5

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-7

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-8

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Oct 11, 2019 | 11:14 AM
  #24  
Melinda Donaghy's Avatar
Melinda Donaghy
New User
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
What is the kit you have?

Originally Posted by pkarhoff
Here is some info I've gathered from tuning/tricking my 17 SCREW F-250.

I live in SE Pima and did a full DOC/SCR/DPF delete and blocked the EGR. I use GDP 200HP Low Smoke ECU tune with the PPEI 1.1.1 TCM tune. I run a 4" DP back pipe to an AFE straight muffler and from the muffler a 5" out to a 6" fluted tip. I did it this way to keep the gasses from expanding so quickly and having poor down low acceleration. So far it seems to be pretty good. I also removed the throttle body adapter and went with a machined aluminum direct adapter for the cold CAC tube. I am experimenting with designing my own catch can for the CCV but as of yet still have it stock. So far my unloaded MPG went from 17.X to 21.x combined city/highway and I have run it for 6000 miles. GDP seems to have the edge on the ECU and MPG vs PPEI to me where PPEI has the edge on the TCM. PPEI ECU tunes are snappy and very good just poor fuel mileage and more smoke. The acceleration is night and day better than stock at all points.The smoke, as the tune indicates, is low and in my case non-existent while driving normal. Under load or for a brief moment while getting on it there will be a little smoke but in both cases it subsides once the turbo spins up to provide the boosted air. While Tucson does require emissions I live just outside the required area so I am not required to get it. You can verify that you are required by looking on AZ DEQ website. If you find that you live outside the area you can call them and they will remove the requirement from the MVD system.

Some of the levels I have now are:

Exhaust Manifold Pressure: Between 1.0 and 7.0 idle and cruising. It will momentarily go higher on heavy acceleration. Using the exhaust brake it hits in the high 30s. For reference, at stock it was always higher than 12 for me.

Turbo Pressure: Between .02 and 34 depending on throttle but usually is within 1 to 3 of the Exhaust unless braking, idle or accelerating.

Turbo Vane Position: Between 27 and 47 cruising on the highway and 27 and 60 in town. With exhaust brake on it will hit 99 and under a very heavy acceleration it has gone to 0.

Injector Pressure: 4.6K PSI at start/idle and with this tune seen as high as 29K PSI under heavy acceleration. I'm still trying to find the upper limit for both pressure and quantity on the Bosch 4.2s but cannot get a solid number. Some numbers have stated that it will handle 38K and others only 34K. I am more worried about quantity than pressure as I'd think I'd run the rail out of fuel before hitting the pressure limit. So I have not done anything higher than 200HP. With the Bosh 4.2s it is the low lubricity of the fuel that is the primary factor on them failing. I religiously use the OptiLube XL additive that reports the wear scar of less than 280um as from what I've read the Bosch 4.2s are designed around 450 um or less. Since the diesel here is normally 500+ um it makes sense to me.

Fuel Injector Quantity: Between 11mm/3 to 88+mm/3 depending on load/acceleration.

Engine Coolant Temp: Runs about 192.2 to 194 under normal driving and will hit 206 under load/throttle.

Exhaust Temp: Anywhere from 400 degrees to 800 degrees for normal driving and throttle load. Towing I watch it like a hawk and have a warning set for 1200 so as to slow down and/or down shift but have not hit this yet. I don't tow and go WOT so it may be a bit before I hit it.

I have not had any trouble with warranty. Each time the shop has worked around what I've done and have honored all warranty needs on the truck.

I do not like doing things that are specifically illegal but in this case it is a pure scam in my opinion. I did all modifications myself in my driveway (except for the actual ECU/TCM tunes) so that if any legal trouble were to come it would solely be on me and not anyone else. Everything I say here, again, is my own opinion from what I have experienced.

The truck runs better, gets better mileage and still produces very low exhaust. I am going to get it tested as an experiment to see if it will pass emissions at some point here this fall. The biggest kicker for me was the damned EGR and DPF. There is absolutely no need for the EGR on a diesel period. I don't care what any mech says, it does no good for the engine.

Allow combustion temps to be higher to more efficiently burn the fuel and you do get more NOX. However, it is simple to control that with DEF and DOC. Then the DPF would not fill as fast further reducing the full on waste mode of the "Active Regen" that happens.

Speaking of the DPF, it is a joke right now for many reasons; not the least of which is injecting more diesel on the exhaust throw to raise exhaust temps to burn off the extra soot created by the inefficient burn cause by a damn EGR controlling NOX. Stevie Wonder could see there is a well planned problem purposely put in place here. I'll play the dumb part and say if, I know they have actually, if they could figure a way to use the DPF and have some sort of electrically generated heat to raise the temps to 800+ degrees to burn it off then I'd be on it. Again, this is my opinion and I won't debate it. If you believe the EGR and current DPF is a good thing then bully for you and I am happy you feel that way. You may be right. On the other hand, from what I have researched, installed and done I come to a different conclusion.

I hope this helps some of you on your decision. Have a great weekend.
Pkarhoff, so we have a 2016 F 350 6.7 and my fiance would like to know what kit you have in your truck. We are looking for information to delete our truck and tring to find which one to go with. Not looking to roll coal (smoke) just a good street reliable truck and better fuel economy when towing and not towing. If you or any have and suggestion would greatly appreciate it.
Thank you
Melinda
 
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2019 | 11:47 AM
  #25  
Jetjock15's Avatar
Jetjock15
Cross-Country
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by pkarhoff
Here is some info I've gathered from tuning/tricking my 17 SCREW F-250.

I live in SE Pima and did a full DOC/SCR/DPF delete and blocked the EGR. I use GDP 200HP Low Smoke ECU tune with the PPEI 1.1.1 TCM tune. I run a 4" DP back pipe to an AFE straight muffler and from the muffler a 5" out to a 6" fluted tip. I did it this way to keep the gasses from expanding so quickly and having poor down low acceleration. So far it seems to be pretty good. I also removed the throttle body adapter and went with a machined aluminum direct adapter for the cold CAC tube. I am experimenting with designing my own catch can for the CCV but as of yet still have it stock. So far my unloaded MPG went from 17.X to 21.x combined city/highway and I have run it for 6000 miles. GDP seems to have the edge on the ECU and MPG vs PPEI to me where PPEI has the edge on the TCM. PPEI ECU tunes are snappy and very good just poor fuel mileage and more smoke. The acceleration is night and day better than stock at all points.The smoke, as the tune indicates, is low and in my case non-existent while driving normal. Under load or for a brief moment while getting on it there will be a little smoke but in both cases it subsides once the turbo spins up to provide the boosted air. While Tucson does require emissions I live just outside the required area so I am not required to get it. You can verify that you are required by looking on AZ DEQ website. If you find that you live outside the area you can call them and they will remove the requirement from the MVD system.

Some of the levels I have now are:

Exhaust Manifold Pressure: Between 1.0 and 7.0 idle and cruising. It will momentarily go higher on heavy acceleration. Using the exhaust brake it hits in the high 30s. For reference, at stock it was always higher than 12 for me.

Turbo Pressure: Between .02 and 34 depending on throttle but usually is within 1 to 3 of the Exhaust unless braking, idle or accelerating.

Turbo Vane Position: Between 27 and 47 cruising on the highway and 27 and 60 in town. With exhaust brake on it will hit 99 and under a very heavy acceleration it has gone to 0.

Injector Pressure: 4.6K PSI at start/idle and with this tune seen as high as 29K PSI under heavy acceleration. I'm still trying to find the upper limit for both pressure and quantity on the Bosch 4.2s but cannot get a solid number. Some numbers have stated that it will handle 38K and others only 34K. I am more worried about quantity than pressure as I'd think I'd run the rail out of fuel before hitting the pressure limit. So I have not done anything higher than 200HP. With the Bosh 4.2s it is the low lubricity of the fuel that is the primary factor on them failing. I religiously use the OptiLube XL additive that reports the wear scar of less than 280um as from what I've read the Bosch 4.2s are designed around 450 um or less. Since the diesel here is normally 500+ um it makes sense to me.

Fuel Injector Quantity: Between 11mm/3 to 88+mm/3 depending on load/acceleration.

Engine Coolant Temp: Runs about 192.2 to 194 under normal driving and will hit 206 under load/throttle.

Exhaust Temp: Anywhere from 400 degrees to 800 degrees for normal driving and throttle load. Towing I watch it like a hawk and have a warning set for 1200 so as to slow down and/or down shift but have not hit this yet. I don't tow and go WOT so it may be a bit before I hit it.

I have not had any trouble with warranty. Each time the shop has worked around what I've done and have honored all warranty needs on the truck.

I do not like doing things that are specifically illegal but in this case it is a pure scam in my opinion. I did all modifications myself in my driveway (except for the actual ECU/TCM tunes) so that if any legal trouble were to come it would solely be on me and not anyone else. Everything I say here, again, is my own opinion from what I have experienced.

The truck runs better, gets better mileage and still produces very low exhaust. I am going to get it tested as an experiment to see if it will pass emissions at some point here this fall. The biggest kicker for me was the damned EGR and DPF. There is absolutely no need for the EGR on a diesel period. I don't care what any mech says, it does no good for the engine.

Allow combustion temps to be higher to more efficiently burn the fuel and you do get more NOX. However, it is simple to control that with DEF and DOC. Then the DPF would not fill as fast further reducing the full on waste mode of the "Active Regen" that happens.

Speaking of the DPF, it is a joke right now for many reasons; not the least of which is injecting more diesel on the exhaust throw to raise exhaust temps to burn off the extra soot created by the inefficient burn cause by a damn EGR controlling NOX. Stevie Wonder could see there is a well planned problem purposely put in place here. I'll play the dumb part and say if, I know they have actually, if they could figure a way to use the DPF and have some sort of electrically generated heat to raise the temps to 800+ degrees to burn it off then I'd be on it. Again, this is my opinion and I won't debate it. If you believe the EGR and current DPF is a good thing then bully for you and I am happy you feel that way. You may be right. On the other hand, from what I have researched, installed and done I come to a different conclusion.

I hope this helps some of you on your decision. Have a great weekend.
Sir can I ask where you are taking your egt reading from? I have been able to drive a 19 deleted with basically zero hp tune taking egt at the block off plate and seeing much higher numbers, WOT in high 1400s. I'd think on a 200hp tune you'd see higher, but all depends on where the reading is taken. Thank you
 
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2019 | 05:38 PM
  #26  
pkarhoff's Avatar
pkarhoff
Trojan Pig
5 Year Member
Liked
Top Answer: 1
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 133
Likes: 88
From: Southern Arizona
Club FTE Gold Member
My temps are taken at the very same block plate you are taking yours from. However, I very rarely go Wide Open Throttle empty and I never got WOT towing; it is asinine to do so. I don't care to pull 15,000+ up a 6% grade for miles at 80MPH passing everyone else just to tell some other bloke in a Duramax that I whooped his ***. I also do not run a 200HP tune while towing. In fact, I go back to a 0HP tune with a good TCM tune to help shifting is all. I deleted my truck for longevity, better mileage and not for all out performance. I don't fault those of you that like to run the hell out of them though. I know it can be fun and I do enjoy running the 200HP LS tune. It puts a smile on my face when young turds in fart can car try to race up on my 6 and cut me off then can't keep up when I punch it. The, "I just got turked by a syphilitic bear" look on their faces are hilarious!

To answer your question, the temps I posted I also stated "normal driving and throttle load" not "running around like a stripped assed ape WOT" trying to destroy my engine with a 200HP tune to see what the highest I can hit for speed and EGTs. As such, my exhaust gas temps reflect that. If I were to get on the throttle and stay on it then of course the temps would climb well above 1400 degrees. For reference sake, if I am traveling down the Interstate at 50 MPH, hit the peddle and let off about 80 to 85 MPH the EGT's will go from 575ish to 900ish degree range. This all happens in a few seconds. Now, running down the Interstate with cruise set at 75 MPH then the EGT's will be in the high 600's to low 700's. Assuming my EGTs would be higher than yours isn't really a good comparison because you are running WOT accelerating where the temps I posted were at normal 1/4 to 1/3 throttle cruising.

Lets go a bit deeper and theorycraft here. Hypothetically speaking, you have a 0HP tune and I have a 200HP low smoke tune. You go WOT, hit 0 to 60 in 8 seconds and have EGT's hitting 1400. I can hit 0 to 60 in 8 seconds using between 1/2 and 2/3 throttle with my EGT's hitting 1200. Keep in mind this isn't exact but would be in the area. Now, I go back and go WOT, hit 0 to 60 in 6.8 seconds. My my EGT's hit high 1400s to 1500s. If I hold out longer then I'd hit 1600's and maybe 1700's. I don't know exactly as I've never done it for longer than to 60 MPH. The difference here is squarely in the tunes. At 0HP your tune hasn't commanded your turbo to keep the vanes more aggressive early on and through the gears to allow the turbo to spool faster. I run LS tunes as low smoke tunes are contrary to low boost fueling which will cause your EGT's to climb much more. I also have a 4" pipe from the turbo outlet to about where the old DPF was and then upsize to 5". This helps some with quicker spooling while still allowing some expansion for better volume and flow.
I didn't mention before but one has to take into account, altitude, outside temps, humidity and the like. That all plays on actual EGTs.

I do apologize for the poor grammar and possible spelling. Voice to text via a cell phone just doesn't seem to work well for me sometimes.

Respectfully,
Phillip
 
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2019 | 08:32 PM
  #27  
Jetjock15's Avatar
Jetjock15
Cross-Country
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by pkarhoff
My temps are taken at the very same block plate you are taking yours from. However, I very rarely go Wide Open Throttle empty and I never got WOT towing; it is asinine to do so. I don't care to pull 15,000+ up a 6% grade for miles at 80MPH passing everyone else just to tell some other bloke in a Duramax that I whooped his ***. I also do not run a 200HP tune while towing. In fact, I go back to a 0HP tune with a good TCM tune to help shifting is all. I deleted my truck for longevity, better mileage and not for all out performance. I don't fault those of you that like to run the hell out of them though. I know it can be fun and I do enjoy running the 200HP LS tune. It puts a smile on my face when young turds in fart can car try to race up on my 6 and cut me off then can't keep up when I punch it. The, "I just got turked by a syphilitic bear" look on their faces are hilarious!

To answer your question, the temps I posted I also stated "normal driving and throttle load" not "running around like a stripped assed ape WOT" trying to destroy my engine with a 200HP tune to see what the highest I can hit for speed and EGTs. As such, my exhaust gas temps reflect that. If I were to get on the throttle and stay on it then of course the temps would climb well above 1400 degrees. For reference sake, if I am traveling down the Interstate at 50 MPH, hit the peddle and let off about 80 to 85 MPH the EGT's will go from 575ish to 900ish degree range. This all happens in a few seconds. Now, running down the Interstate with cruise set at 75 MPH then the EGT's will be in the high 600's to low 700's. Assuming my EGTs would be higher than yours isn't really a good comparison because you are running WOT accelerating where the temps I posted were at normal 1/4 to 1/3 throttle cruising.

Lets go a bit deeper and theorycraft here. Hypothetically speaking, you have a 0HP tune and I have a 200HP low smoke tune. You go WOT, hit 0 to 60 in 8 seconds and have EGT's hitting 1400. I can hit 0 to 60 in 8 seconds using between 1/2 and 2/3 throttle with my EGT's hitting 1200. Keep in mind this isn't exact but would be in the area. Now, I go back and go WOT, hit 0 to 60 in 6.8 seconds. My my EGT's hit high 1400s to 1500s. If I hold out longer then I'd hit 1600's and maybe 1700's. I don't know exactly as I've never done it for longer than to 60 MPH. The difference here is squarely in the tunes. At 0HP your tune hasn't commanded your turbo to keep the vanes more aggressive early on and through the gears to allow the turbo to spool faster. I run LS tunes as low smoke tunes are contrary to low boost fueling which will cause your EGT's to climb much more. I also have a 4" pipe from the turbo outlet to about where the old DPF was and then upsize to 5". This helps some with quicker spooling while still allowing some expansion for better volume and flow.
I didn't mention before but one has to take into account, altitude, outside temps, humidity and the like. That all plays on actual EGTs.

I do apologize for the poor grammar and possible spelling. Voice to text via a cell phone just doesn't seem to work well for me sometimes.

Respectfully,
Phillip
Thank you for very informative post. I like you am all about longevity. The reason I did the delete. Had to get the tune for the delete. I just wanted to Test WOT runs but I’ll never be there again. I have a 450 and tow a 25k trailer often. There is one 7% grade I have to do once or twice a year for 9 miles and another 6% grades for 5 miles about once a month. Before the delete my truck would get to third gear and be pedal to the floor, computer controlled giving all it has. I haven’t done those runs deleted but will in few weeks. I’m interested to see egt. It’s not what I would say is WOT but it is pedal to floor if you can follow my logic. It’s the computer controlling the max she going to give. Since it’s a 0hp tune I guess the egts should be same as pre delete I Just wasn’t monitoring them. We will see
 
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2023 | 09:41 PM
  #28  
nolan_riddle's Avatar
nolan_riddle
1st Gear
Joined: Jun 2023
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by urname7698
Send me a PM if you need a northern AZ address. We live in Yavapai county and have a few other properties too

You also just update your mailing address to be your PHX address or a PO Box so you'll never even have your tags mailed there.
Offer still stands?!
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Cnstewart
2017 - 2022 Super Duty
13
Mar 13, 2019 07:39 AM
2006powerstroke90
6.7L Power Stroke Diesel
18
Sep 25, 2018 08:51 AM
kd2dwj
2017 - 2022 Super Duty
12
Sep 4, 2018 10:41 AM
redz284u
2017 - 2022 Super Duty
4
Nov 30, 2016 11:01 PM
tb40nd
1997 - 2003 F150
13
Jul 30, 2005 10:31 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:07 AM.

story-0
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-2
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-4
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-6
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-7
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-8
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE