When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
The TimeSert inserts I have replace the original casting four threads with four threads in the insert - kit is 5553 with inserts 51459.
You can refer to the TimeSert website to determine if your head castings might be candidate for their second option, replacing the original cast four threads with full length threads - this is a different kit and different inserts.
I have the Timesert 5553 kit and repaired #3 on our 6.8L with it.
The inserts are stainless steel and have 4 threads which is sufficient.
I just looked thru the Timesert website and don't see an optional kit.
Do you have the part no.?
There is a kit that has what looks like 8 thread inserts for the 3V heads which use M16 plugs.
I have the Timesert 5553 kit and repaired #3 on our 6.8L with it.
The inserts are stainless steel and have 4 threads which is sufficient.
I just looked thru the Timesert website and don't see an optional kit.
Do you have the part no.?
There is a kit that has what looks like 8 thread inserts for the 3V heads which use M16 plugs.
Always use anti sieze on the new motorcraft plugs.. not alot. you dont want the plug to corrode in the hole. torque to spec its not much. Timesert works well no need for new heads imo. I never lost a plug. maybe someone over torqued them and weakened the threads although they can take alot of torque.
I use anti-sieze, I lost a plug after 25k miles at the factory spec.
Originally Posted by projectSHO89
Use the Timesert, CalVan, or Lock-n-Stitch to repair any blown holes. Do NOT use the Helicoils!!!
Put plugs in DRY, do NOT repeat NOT use anti-seize on the moduar engines, it screws up the torque which contributes to the risk of blown plugs.
Torque to 26-28 lb-ft, double the factory specification. You'd have to go beyond 100 lb-ft to damage the threads.
I agree with the kits you mention to use but disagree on the Heli-Coil exception being the Sav-a-thread. See picture below. It has the stiching like the other kits.
Originally Posted by geekwithoutacause
Use anti-seize vs don't use anti-seize. nice info guys.
The original torque spec was too low. Use the above mentioned 26 - 28 ftlbs spec.
As far as anti-seize... I don't know.
I use anti-sieze because of the dissimilar metals. Torque spec over 25 ft-lbs is good.
Originally Posted by 99f350sd
Been here since 2003 guys Use the antiseize and all will be good. They are not torqued much so a little lube wont hurt the torque..I'll bet 99 % of us has been using anti seize on the motorcraft plugs all along. Motorcraft recommends it. I've been reading it for years. 1st time I've heard of someone saying don't do it. To each his own I guess.
Originally Posted by 99f350sd
By the way I torqued mine always to 10-12 Ib-ft...That is what the book says. For my 99.
I did the same 25-30k ago and blew a plug March of 2016. After that I upped all plugs to 25 ft-lbs.
No they don't. If they did, it would be in the factory service manual. You didn't read that it is recommend in the 2V heads in anything published by Ford.
I agree with the kits you mention to use but disagree on the Heli-Coil exception being the Sav-a-thread. See picture below. It has the stiching like the other kits.
The Save-a-Thread also fails, seen too many of them from guys looking to rent my Timesert kit.
Ive been under the impression that the torque spec for the plugs is around 18 lb ft. Thats where I run the plugs in my mustang. Its 13:1 compression and has the 4 thread pi heads on it.
I didn't give you a citation. I just told you where to go get it. Did you ask ?
I am on my second vehicle with the V10 in question. Both have done great with 25 ftlbs of torque on the plugs, just like the Ford mechanic told me. But what do I know, he only has 25 years of service. I guess this forum is more reliable.
Personally, I recommend 28 lb-ft, but I also know it is not a Ford recommendation.
Getting information for a "Ford mechanic", an employee of a private business that is not Ford but is a franchisee, is certainly not the same as getting the information from "Ford", the company. If "Ford" issued information that changed the specifications that were previously published, it would be in the form of a TSM, SSM, or the like. That would be a citation of an official source. If they have issued one, it would be news to pretty much everyone around here.
There is a distinct difference between an anecdote and a citation from the official source.
Personally, I recommend 28 lb-ft, but I also know it is not a Ford recommendation.
Getting information for a "Ford mechanic", an employee of a private business that is not Ford but is a franchisee, is certainly not the same as getting the information from "Ford", the company. If "Ford" issued information that changed the specifications that were previously published, it would be in the form of a TSM, SSM, or the like. That would be a citation of an official source. If they have issued one, it would be news to pretty much everyone around here.
There is a distinct difference between an anecdote and a citation from the official source.
Full blown Ford Dealership.
So I conclude from what you are saying that Ford garage (not independent) are STILL tightening the plugs to 11 ftlbs( or whatever the torque amount was that they were set at initially) on these engines?
I seriously doubt that.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.