Ford vs The Competition Technical discussion and comparison ONLY. Trolls will not be tolerated.

V 10 Triton in a 2002 Pace Arrow RV

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 09-09-2003, 11:10 AM
Mwith's Avatar
Mwith
Mwith is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
V 10 Triton in a 2002 Pace Arrow RV

Does anyone have + or - feedback or info on this engine?

Is it the 310 horsepower engine?
What is the torque rating compared to the 7.3 PS?

Finally, why doesn't the F-53 chassis come with an option of the powerstroke?
 
  #2  
Old 09-10-2003, 11:05 PM
c_rossman's Avatar
c_rossman
c_rossman is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Cloud USA
Posts: 1,349
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
V 10 Triton in a 2002 Pace Arrow RV

Alot of RV's dont offer a diesel just because diesel fuel isnt always available out in the sticks where people camp. Where there is gasoline, doesnt mean there is diesel fuel.
 
  #3  
Old 09-26-2003, 04:09 PM
marknga's Avatar
marknga
marknga is offline
New User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Warner Robins, Ga
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi, this thread is alittle old but I had to jump in. I sell RV's and the reason you don't see the powerstroke in more motorhomes is the weight issue. We sell Coachmen RV's and there is a couple of class C models that offer the Powerstroke option. The PS is heavier and takes away from the GCVW. The class A models are now either the V-10 which has been an awesome motor and the new GM 8.1L with the Workhorse chassis. The 8.1L is the most powerful gasoline engine offered in an RV. Mileage with V-10 range from 8-10(depending on weather, terrain, tow vehicle) and the 8.1L 9-12mpg(same factors) This isn't something I've read just what I am hearing from my customers.
Mark
 
  #4  
Old 09-28-2003, 10:18 AM
phatpharm85's Avatar
phatpharm85
phatpharm85 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: torrington,ct
Posts: 773
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i also work for an rv dealership and i deal with rentals. ide have to say that between two comparable motorshomes one on a ford f-53 and one on a workhorse the ford seems to want to move alittle better. the fords are also much more reliable. all of our major problems have been on the chevy/workhorse chassis. not to mention chevy just dosent have a heavy duty enough chassis to be under any sizable motorhome. all the bigger motorhomes that ive seen have been on a ford chassis.
 
  #5  
Old 09-29-2003, 11:01 AM
Mwith's Avatar
Mwith
Mwith is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for info

Keep the observations opinions coming. Still looking for the info on the HP of the year/model. anyone know?
 
  #6  
Old 09-29-2003, 01:16 PM
ktmguy70's Avatar
ktmguy70
ktmguy70 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wasnt the old cruise airs GM

wasnt the old cruise air motor homes GM?wow the fords are much more reliable, imagine someone saying that on a ford forum..

Ron
00 Excursion Limited 4x4 V-10
 
  #7  
Old 09-29-2003, 08:16 PM
phatpharm85's Avatar
phatpharm85
phatpharm85 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: torrington,ct
Posts: 773
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hhahaha ktmguy good point, i think 310 sounds about right, the tourqe might be slightly more do to the longer exhaust but dont quote me on that. and im not sure about the cruise air
 
  #8  
Old 09-30-2003, 03:47 PM
Colossus's Avatar
Colossus
Colossus is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Oak Harbor WA
Posts: 1,437
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah, I would agree on the weight issue. Technically, gasoline engined trucks can haul more than a diesel.
Diesels are nice, but they are harder to maintain, and have to be operated a certain way.
The simplicity of the gasoline engine is a bonus, and it is much lighter and offers plenty of power. The only disadvantage of the gasser is the fuel economy.
The V10 is a good engine from what I hear, personally, I prefer the older 460's. Very simple to maintain, very reliable, lots of power. My 460 gets between 7.5 and 8, and its a utility truck weighing in around 7K.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dadstruck
1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
14
02-20-2016 10:22 PM
jowilker
1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
5
11-10-2012 10:43 AM
Ford Inline Six, 200, 250, 4.9L / 300
2
05-03-2002 01:31 AM
Flash
1997 - 2003 F150
4
03-24-2002 10:12 PM
RRL78
1978 - 1996 Big Bronco
2
10-17-2000 12:10 PM



Quick Reply: V 10 Triton in a 2002 Pace Arrow RV



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:52 PM.