Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks

Getting frustrated...engine swap thoughts?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 5, 2017 | 02:35 PM
  #1  
adam.hilberath's Avatar
adam.hilberath
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
Getting frustrated...engine swap thoughts?

Alright everyone. My truck is up to 192k on stock engine and trans. She was pulled off the road last year and re did all the suspension. Well shes back on the road. I did a trip recently roughly 450 miles. 225 empty, 225 loaded with a 10 ft trailer and a motorcycle. And i am disapointed with how it performed and the mileage i got. Averaged altogether 9mpg. Terrible power pulling hills. Kiterally could not pull hills.

Leads me to mu thought, engine and trans swap. Anybody have any thoughts that do decent mileage and can pull a stupid friggin hill? Not picky about make and everything either. Id love to hit high teens n low 20s in mpg. Thoughts? Im pretty frustrated with her lately.
 
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2017 | 02:52 PM
  #2  
timbersteel's Avatar
timbersteel
Logistics Pro
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,698
Likes: 47
From: Mexico, Missouri
Not sure what engine and transmission you have.

A lot factors in with axle, 2wd or 4wd. What size tires?

My '92, 4wd, 300, Ext. cab gets 15mpg. That's with 3.08's, LT 235's and M5OD. Everything thing else I have is 302, 307, 351. My 307 gets 11's, 302 gets 13-15 and just rebuilt the 351 so I have no numbers yet.

All of my trucks have 4wd and are Ext. cab.
The 307 has 3.55, the 302 has 3.31, and the 351 has 3.55.

Edit: I should note that the 307 has an AOD, the 302 has a 4R70W, the 351 has an E4OD.
 
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2017 | 02:59 PM
  #3  
adam.hilberath's Avatar
adam.hilberath
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
My apologies, the frustration lol.
It is 9250, 5.0, e4od, 3.55 gear, 33s. 2wd, No lift, decent alignment, rebuilt front suspension, and rear spring mounts n bushings, new tanks (both were leaking in the past), new plugs, year old wires, year old cap/rotor, new air filter, new fuel pressure regulator, new o2 sensor, and more. Cant remember more though. I just can not pull it out of single digits. I pulled it last year at 7mpg. I have increased it some, but not nearly enough.
 
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2017 | 03:40 PM
  #4  
White 97 xlt's Avatar
White 97 xlt
Postmaster
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,728
Likes: 8
From: Cleveland, TN
Originally Posted by adam.hilberath
My apologies, the frustration lol.
It is 9250, 5.0, e4od, 3.55 gear, 33s. 2wd, No lift, decent alignment, rebuilt front suspension, and rear spring mounts n bushings, new tanks (both were leaking in the past), new plugs, year old wires, year old cap/rotor, new air filter, new fuel pressure regulator, new o2 sensor, and more. Cant remember more though. I just can not pull it out of single digits. I pulled it last year at 7mpg. I have increased it some, but not nearly enough.
??? Is that 1992 150, 250, 350, or something else? Size of the truck will make a difference, if you want help you are going to have to help us know what you have... we can guess all day and still not answer the question....
 
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2017 | 03:56 PM
  #5  
mrollings53's Avatar
mrollings53
Laughing Gas
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,227
Likes: 4
From: Washington
It's an F150, because the 302 was never put in anything bigger.

If you are dead set on an engine swap; put in a 351, then swap out the rear end for 4.10 gears. Your mileage will suffer because of this, but your towing capability will be much greater.
 
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2017 | 04:05 PM
  #6  
adam.hilberath's Avatar
adam.hilberath
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by White 97 xlt
??? Is that 1992 150, 250, 350, or something else? Size of the truck will make a difference, if you want help you are going to have to help us know what you have... we can guess all day and still not answer the question....
Sorry, my phone can be tricky. Its f150. Did not notice the typo. I cant do 410 rears, my mpg needs to go up. I have had some thoughts, but itd make every person on this forum pissed lok
 
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2017 | 04:05 PM
  #7  
530ktmpilot's Avatar
530ktmpilot
Senior User
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 415
Likes: 1
I had a 1993 w/ 5.8 and it was gutless as well. Put a vortec supercharger on it which helped but still felt underpowered. Mileage was also dismal. Not alot of ways to make it better without spending major bucks. Personally, I'd look for a similar 3/4 ton with 460 and sell what you have. Money wise this is the cheapest option; you'll be ahead but fuel mileage will still suck (same as you are getting or slightly better but nowhere near 20mpg). Other options are get a newer truck (3.5 EB or diesel) if you want power and mileage.

The mileage I on my vehicles (shown in my signature below) was as follows FWIW (unloaded freeway@65mph/towing freeway @ 65mph with 5k traveltrailer)

Supercharged f150- 14/8
F350 V10- 12/7
F250 powerstroke- 20/13
 
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2017 | 04:51 PM
  #8  
adam.hilberath's Avatar
adam.hilberath
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
I guess heres my argument (always been a ford guy) but a certain bow tie competitor, gets much better mileage and pulls a whole lot better. How can it be so different? Ive done so much on it to bring the mileage up and still dont touch close to what i actually need. Ive had thoughts of the lq4 because of the power. 345 hp stock. And people have been claiming great mileage. All i know is somethings gotta change.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Aug 5, 2017 | 05:33 PM
  #9  
krooser's Avatar
krooser
Laughing Gas
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,069
Likes: 19
From: Central Wisconsin
Have your fuel economy figures been done allowing for those 33's?

I'd be sure the timing is correct (make sure the outer ring on the damper is not spun) the advance it until it pings then back it off a degree or so. Be sure the advance mechanism is working... check the cam lift to be sure you don't have a bad lobe or two. Replace the timing chain...at 192K I'm sure it's shot. The whole motor may need a rebuild...

Those Bowties always get better mileage until you buy one then find out they don't. Newer trucks get much better fuel economy than the older tech ones we discuss here... that may be your best route if that's in your budget.
 
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2017 | 06:07 PM
  #10  
adam.hilberath's Avatar
adam.hilberath
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
Ive looked at whole rebuild, and ive also looked at a whole powerplant update. Would really like a whole rebuild update though. I know its always been good to me. Just my current numbers are about despicable.
 
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2017 | 06:25 PM
  #11  
Fastback460's Avatar
Fastback460
Posting Guru
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,949
Likes: 7
Originally Posted by adam.hilberath
I guess heres my argument (always been a ford guy) but a certain bow tie competitor, gets much better mileage and pulls a whole lot better. How can it be so different? Ive done so much on it to bring the mileage up and still dont touch close to what i actually need. Ive had thoughts of the lq4 because of the power. 345 hp stock. And people have been claiming great mileage. All i know is somethings gotta change.
If the chevy truck you are comparing it too is much newer then that is your answer as to why it has better gas mileage. Newer trucks are going to have better mpg since they are built in a time when mpg is a big concern for a lot of people, where as when our old trucks were built I don't think it was as big of a deal since gas prices were lower. Also a new chevy will be MUCH lighter then our trucks and that alone can make a difference. Plus they are able to build engines much more efficient these days then they used to.

But I personally have not seen a full size truck that actually averages over 20 mpg in the real world. I've heard a lot of claims of great mpg, but whenever I talk to someone that actually owns one of those trucks it's more like 17-18 mpg at the most.

EDIT: I looked into a newer truck at one point for better mpg. But for any decent newer truck I was looking at around $25-$30k. When I actually calculate it I average about $1,500 a year in gas and I have about $15k into my truck over the past 6 years. So it would take me about 10 years before I spent the $15,000 in gas with my 460, which to me is not worth buying a new truck.
 
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2017 | 07:18 PM
  #12  
adam.hilberath's Avatar
adam.hilberath
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
It is in a newer truck (2003) but i think its more along the lines they are built to be mofe efficient. Does someone have some ideas of what could be done during a rebuild to help me out if i end with that route? I know there are really only a few cams to use, but dont remember off the top of my head which ones. If i do a rebuild, i will replace all injectors and vacuum lines. I no longer have cats due to michigans lovely winters. So i have also thouhht about removing the air pump and other junk that runs with it. What are some thoughts of sone things i could do? Keep in mind i am wanting to hopefully regain some mpg. And if i do the rebuild route i will also rebuild my e4od while everything is out. May be next year til im able to do everything since i no longer have a garage.
 
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2017 | 07:36 PM
  #13  
Nothing Special's Avatar
Nothing Special
Lead Driver
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,006
Likes: 72
From: Roseville, MN
The Holy Grail for mileage / towing is a Cummins. The 4BT gives better mileage and good power, the 6BT gives better power and good mileage. But swaps are usually more expensive and take longer than most people expect.

If you want the best mileage in an older gas engine, you probably have the right one in the 302. Somethings wrong that it's getting as bad as it is. And 4.10 gears might not actually hurt your mileage that much (the 302 does need to spin a little).

If you need more power than that, my '95 F-150 SuperCab shortbox 4WD had a 351W, E4OD, 3.55 gears and 32" tires. It would get ~13 mpg in normal driving. Hauling a slide-in camper and towing a CJ5 (~ 10,000 lb GCWR) I'd still get 7~8 mpg at 65-70 mpg. It was no powerhouse, but I was always happy with the performance.

If you want a more complicated gas engine swap into a newer design, I probably would go with the heresy of an LS as well. I don't have any personal experience with them, but know a lot of people that like them. And personally I don't like the Ford mod motors.
 
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2017 | 07:42 PM
  #14  
adam.hilberath's Avatar
adam.hilberath
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
I have toyed the idea of the cummins. But the cost...might as well write a blank check. I be happy to keep my 302 n e4od if i have a dream of getting back a little mileage. Even if its just mid teens, i can work with it.
 
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2017 | 07:53 PM
  #15  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Originally Posted by adam.hilberath
I cant do 410 rears, my mpg needs to go up.
No you don't understand, those 33" tires are killing both performance and fuel milage and you will do much better on both counts with 4.10 gears. If you did nothing else to the truck a gear change alone would be worth it.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:25 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE