Modular V10 (6.8l)  

plug spitter, repeat offender

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 02-01-2017, 10:31 PM
rdmobile's Avatar
rdmobile
rdmobile is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Westminster
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
plug spitter, repeat offender

Own a 99F250 SD w/V 10. # 10 cylinder spit a plug last night. This is the second time this has happened. Both times I have been lucky and the threads have not stripped. first time this occurred I removed all plugs and retorqued, can't remember value, but it was something like to 100-120 in*lb. This time torqued to 130.

No other plugs have spit. I find it odd that this is twice on the same cylinder. Coincidence or is there something wrong with this one?
 
  #2  
Old 02-02-2017, 12:17 AM
jh818's Avatar
jh818
jh818 is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Chino, California
Posts: 2,884
Received 22 Likes on 20 Posts
Torque is 132 in.-lbs.
 
  #3  
Old 02-02-2017, 02:02 AM
Sam I Am's Avatar
Sam I Am
Sam I Am is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Fort Smith, Arkansas
Posts: 1,908
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
I would torque them about 30 foot pounds.

It could be that the first time the plug was simply loose. # 10 is the most difficult to reach so it is possible it did not get as tight as the others. Then the 2nd time, there is likely some wear or deformation on the threads due to the first ejection. If it was mine, I would install a Time-Sert on # 10.
 
  #4  
Old 02-02-2017, 06:27 AM
WE3ZS's Avatar
WE3ZS
WE3ZS is offline
World Famous Mod
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Media PA
Posts: 11,380
Received 833 Likes on 572 Posts
You are a little short of the factory spec of 132 in/lbs, which in my opinion is not tight enough. I have an '05 2V which has a factory spec of 14 ft/lbs (168 in/lbs) but I torqued them to 32 ft/lbs (384 in/lbs) with just a dab of nickel anti-seize on the threads.


There was a guy online who torque tested some of the 4 thread early motors in a junkyard, he took them up to 110 ft/lbs without any thread failures, so I think upping the torque over the very light factory numbers is safe. (Don't go to extremes though...).
 
  #5  
Old 02-02-2017, 07:29 AM
krewat's Avatar
krewat
krewat is offline
Site Administrator
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Long Island USA
Posts: 42,561
Received 298 Likes on 157 Posts
Originally Posted by WE3ZS
There was a guy online who torque tested some of the 4 thread early motors in a junkyard, he took them up to 110 ft/lbs without any thread failures, so I think upping the torque over the very light factory numbers is safe. (Don't go to extremes though...).
The problem is, he didn't subject them to any heat cycles and observe the results

Even 30ft/lbs is a bit much in my opinion.

The rate of thermal expansion of steel is almost half that of aluminum. In the area between the threads and the taper, the head will expand a lot more than the steel spark plug. That means if it's too tight, it WILL either hollow out the taper in the head, or pull the threads.

But yeah, 11-14 ft/lbs is way too loose if you ask me.
 
  #6  
Old 02-02-2017, 12:10 PM
truckfella's Avatar
truckfella
truckfella is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 974
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
I agree with Sam I Am statement. Likely that the threads are deformed or otherwise mucked up from the first time it blew out.

Spend the $200 or so to have a Timesert installed and be done with it.
 
  #7  
Old 02-03-2017, 05:52 AM
Harryjt's Avatar
Harryjt
Harryjt is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I would not use anti seize on the 2v valve engines. the torque specs are based on dry threads. plus with a motor that has a history of plugs backing out why would you want to give the plugs less resistance. I know the 3 valve engines had a problem with plugs breaking off because of the design .
 
  #8  
Old 02-03-2017, 10:04 AM
dkf's Avatar
dkf
dkf is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Pa
Posts: 10,101
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Sounds like you need a Timesert in #10. It is highly unlikely the plug backed out enough to blow and not do damage to the threads once, let alone twice.
 
  #9  
Old 02-04-2017, 02:33 PM
rdmobile's Avatar
rdmobile
rdmobile is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Westminster
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I had a hard time finding a consistent torque spec. I think 30 ftlb is way too high. I will go in and retorque them to 140 inlb. As for the timesert I'll save that for next time. Runs now don't fix what isn't broke. If it pops again I can disable the injector and coil and limp her home then timesert it. Thanks
 
  #10  
Old 02-04-2017, 03:43 PM
Sam I Am's Avatar
Sam I Am
Sam I Am is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Fort Smith, Arkansas
Posts: 1,908
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by rdmobile
I think 30 ftlb is way too high.
That is why your plugs keep ejecting.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rob89
1999 to 2016 Super Duty
2
06-14-2019 07:46 PM
bill11012
Modular V10 (6.8l)
7
05-21-2010 06:57 AM
jim042796
Modular V8 (4.6L, 5.4L)
15
04-05-2008 06:58 PM
Studenut65
Modular V10 (6.8l)
15
02-08-2006 02:59 PM
3speed
Modular V10 (6.8l)
5
02-23-2005 05:30 PM



Quick Reply: plug spitter, repeat offender



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:35 AM.