When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
They suggest 28 - 32 ft-lbs. This scares the you know what out of me. They say they have successfully done many this way. (and I have no reason to doubt this) I am afraid they will just twist right out of the head.
I will soon be retorqueing (sp?) my plugs and I saw this and I started wondering.
Has anyone tried this? Does everyone usually stick with the recommended values - which I understand are 12-14 ft-lbs, please correct me if I am wrong.
They suggest 28 - 32 ft-lbs. This scares the you know what out of me. They say they have successfully done many this way. (and I have no reason to doubt this) I am afraid they will just twist right out of the head.
I will soon be retorqueing (sp?) my plugs and I saw this and I started wondering.
Has anyone tried this? Does everyone usually stick with the recommended values - which I understand are 12-14 ft-lbs, please correct me if I am wrong.
Thanks - Jim
Their answer to the question on their web page is vague and a bit misleading (IMO); they appear to be saying that the higher torque value is for the repaired plug insert, not a normal plug being replaced in a normal head. If they polled only 10 master Ford mechanics about it, then the Ford mechanics must have been agreeing that higher torque in a repair sleeve would keep the plug and sleeve from twisting or pulling out of the head. After all, it is a steel plug & threads being torqued on a steel sleeve (vice the old steel threads on the aluminum head threads). Makes you wonder what the other tens of thousands of master Ford mechanics would say. The author on that page does not differentiate between the two instances of torque values. IMO, if you torque a steel-threaded plug in a normal, non-damaged aluminum thread hole beyond factory specs, you may be at risk of stripping it. Torqueing it to the upper range of the 12-15 can't hurt, though.
It has been a while since I saw the many many different specs for the modulars but from what I remember 17ft-lbs was the highest I saw. It has always been my understanding that over torquing is the main reason why you pop a plug in the first place.
Do they make the distinction between the torque values on the insert-repaired plugs and the torque on existing non-insert plugs?
They don't really make a statement about torque for repaired heads, but they do say the following about original heads:
This sentence is directly from their page. Keep in mind it is not the entire FAQ.
"To verify that we would not damage the original threads we used a test cylinder head with good factory threads we applied over 100 foot lbs of torque to the spark plug without any failure."
They don't really make a statement about torque for repaired heads, but they do say the following about original heads:
This sentence is directly from their page. Keep in mind it is not the entire FAQ.
"To verify that we would not damage the original threads we used a test cylinder head with good factory threads we applied over 100 foot lbs of torque to the spark plug without any failure."
Jim
It's pretty interesting how the way it is written appears to cloud the context of its meaning. Even that sentence above doesn't frame the parameters of that test. To make that claim believable (to me, at least), I'd want to know that they ran the engine with over-torqued plugs under some condition - like say maybe, under load. They don't even tell you they turned the engine on, just that they over-torqued the plugs. Anyway, if over-torqueing works for them in one static block on one given day under non-lab conditions, more power to them; too scary for me, though.
Thats the same problem I had. Now if they over torqued that much and then put 70K miles on them and removed the plugs with no threads coming out they might have *some* credibility.
There's no reason to go over 10-11 ft-lbs, 14-15 ft-lbs is too much, 28+ ft-lbs is flat idiotic and will likely strip the threads right there.
I actually torqued the plugs in my truck to 9 ft-lbs (with a dab of anti-seize on a stone cold engine) and it's been like that for 45,000 miles now, did it like that on my previous 2Vs for years and never had a spark plug issue and neither has anyone else who has followed that procedure.
Overtorqueing the plugs is the primary reason why they shoot out of the heads in the first place. Over tightening the plugs distorts and weakens the threads in the head. Even the assembly plant is sometimes guilty of overtightening the plugs.
Over torquing and detonation are the main reasons for blown plugs. The cylinder pressure raises really high during detonation and over torqued, stressed threads will not hold up to the detonation pressures.
There's no reason to go over 10-11 ft-lbs, 14-15 ft-lbs is too much, 28+ ft-lbs is flat idiotic and will likely strip the threads right there.
I actually torqued the plugs in my truck to 9 ft-lbs (with a dab of anti-seize on a stone cold engine) and it's been like that for 45,000 miles now, did it like that on my previous 2Vs for years and never had a spark plug issue and neither has anyone else who has followed that procedure.
Overtorqueing the plugs is the primary reason why they shoot out of the heads in the first place. Over tightening the plugs distorts and weakens the threads in the head. Even the assembly plant is sometimes guilty of overtightening the plugs.
Right on, brother, I'm with you. I went to just at 13 ft-lbs with a digital torque wrench, anti sieze, etc. and mine are fine as new. Even the average home mechanic who is not a materials engineer or metallurgist can tell that the blowoutsparkplug.com dudes are selling a bunch of .... (just my $.02) ... to each their own, though. 100 ft-lbs...yeah right.
My 2002 f250 5.4 has 59,000 km (Can)/ 36,000 mi on it (used only to go fishing). It of course has the original factory plugs still in it....do i have to worry about spitting #3 plug? And if ok then when it comes time to change the plugs, use motorcraft/autolite plugs torqued to 14lbs+/- in a cold engine and everything should be ok. The reason I'm asking is because in another thread I stated that I was going to have a discussion with my Ford dealerships service manager on the subject of the spitting plugs when it goes in for 60,000km servicing. I'd like to avoid being stuck 50 miles in the bush with a blown plug if at all possible!
My 2002 f250 5.4 has 59,000 km (Can)/ 36,000 mi on it (used only to go fishing). It of course has the original factory plugs still in it....do i have to worry about spitting #3 plug? And if ok then when it comes time to change the plugs, use motorcraft/autolite plugs torqued to 14lbs+/- in a cold engine and everything should be ok. The reason I'm asking is because in another thread I stated that I was going to have a discussion with my Ford dealerships service manager on the subject of the spitting plugs when it goes in for 60,000km servicing. I'd like to avoid being stuck 50 miles in the bush with a blown plug if at all possible!
I did mine myself at 84k, a whopping 16k ahead of schedule mainly because I had begun to see all the threads on plug blow outs. I could have gone another 20k on those plugs, but the opportunity to pull and replace them with anti-seize and the correct torque gave me peace of mind. It's expensive to have the dealer do it. Changing them yourself, if you can, assures that no unscrupulous mechanic with conveniently 'forget' to do #4 and #8, which can be tricky as they are in back of the engine.
I went and changed my plugs when I bought my 4.6 99 Exp. I was amazed to find mismatched part number plugs in different cylinders, so I assumed they were probably originals with 100k+ miles on them. I have my fingers crossed, because my Snap-on dealer told me not to torque the new plugs, just snug them only. So far, I have about 8k miles on them and everything seems ok. Now I read these posts, and the aluminum heads got me a little nervous.
Torque the plugs to exactly what the Ford manual says, not what your Snap On guys says. Unless he works for Ford, has a special line in to the Ford materials engineers, or just has a lot of stock invested in Ford - I wouldn't just 'snug them tight' like he says.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.