Notices
1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Bumpsides Ford Truck

Extra long wheel base?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 30, 2016 | 10:08 AM
  #16  
mrpotatohead's Avatar
mrpotatohead
Thread Starter
|
Posting Guru
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,477
Likes: 7
From: NAMPA, ID.
The fordification website says that the back of cab to rear axle centerline should be 56 inches, mine measures 70 inches.
 
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2016 | 10:20 AM
  #17  
JEFFFAFA's Avatar
JEFFFAFA
Hotshot
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,255
Likes: 199
From: Phoenix, Az.
Originally Posted by mrpotatohead
There are no weld joints. The frame as I said is solid, unspliced and original looking. When I bought it I noticed that they had added fish plates to the inside of the frame. I asked him about it and he said that they had a feeder mechanism of some sort on this thing and that they braced the frame with these plates. Again, I ground around on the frame with a flapper wheel and can find no area where it was welded together. It's all smooth top and bottom. The vin says its a long bed (131 inch wheelbase) and that it's a conventional cab, 67 f-100 4x4. ??
HMMM. Fish plates? Sounds to me like the PO was Pulling Your Lariat. https://storage.googleapis.com/vidsu...282ae09690.mp4


Like a lot of times on sale day a 360 magically becomes a 390.
 
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2016 | 10:43 AM
  #18  
351Cleveland C4's Avatar
351Cleveland C4
Lead Driver
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 8,678
Likes: 191
From: On the Edge of the Desert
Take a good look (and more pictures) of the areas I circled. I see a couple signs that point to a joint...
 
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2016 | 06:58 PM
  #19  
mrpotatohead's Avatar
mrpotatohead
Thread Starter
|
Posting Guru
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,477
Likes: 7
From: NAMPA, ID.
wheelbase

I agree, I would expect to see some joints in the frame where it was extended but it simply isn't there. The rails are unmolested, they have the gradual curves etc. Here are some pictures I took today.
 
Attached Images      
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2016 | 07:12 PM
  #20  
351Cleveland C4's Avatar
351Cleveland C4
Lead Driver
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 8,678
Likes: 191
From: On the Edge of the Desert
Obviously I'm not seeing it in person, so I could be wrong. But look at that in the picture...

The frame jumps what looks like a 1/4" in width instantly. Sharp 90 degree cut. At that same point, there is a vertical seam...

That says to me, that the frame was cut, and C-channel of appropriate size was used to extend the frame.

Welds can be very well hidden if the fabricator knows what he's doing...
 
Attached Images  
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2016 | 07:44 PM
  #21  
mrpotatohead's Avatar
mrpotatohead
Thread Starter
|
Posting Guru
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,477
Likes: 7
From: NAMPA, ID.
That is the edge of the c-channel. I've been welding for years, there would be evidence on the outside of the frame rail of any sectioning. That's all.
 
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2016 | 09:47 PM
  #22  
351Cleveland C4's Avatar
351Cleveland C4
Lead Driver
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 8,678
Likes: 191
From: On the Edge of the Desert
Ok.

Anyway, ford never made one that length, and ford didn't build the frames to begin with, they were outsourced from another company. I don't remember the name off hand.

So I find it highly unlikely that ford would ask for a special length frame without ordering enough of them to pay for the retool.


It's been modified somewhere, you're just not seeing it. You said yourself it's a one owner rig, and that the tag says 131" wheelbase. Obviously it's not 131, so where's the stretch??
 
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2016 | 03:38 AM
  #23  
GaryKip's Avatar
GaryKip
Logistics Pro
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 4,093
Likes: 14
From: Lind, WA- Eastern WA
Originally Posted by 351Cleveland C4
Ok.

Anyway, ford never made one that length, and ford didn't build the frames to begin with, they were outsourced from another company. I don't remember the name off hand.

So I find it highly unlikely that ford would ask for a special length frame without ordering enough of them to pay for the retool.


It's been modified somewhere, you're just not seeing it. You said yourself it's a one owner rig, and that the tag says 131" wheelbase. Obviously it's not 131, so where's the stretch??
Slightly to the left of your circle look at the innermost C channel. Not original!
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Dec 31, 2016 | 03:43 AM
  #24  
GaryKip's Avatar
GaryKip
Logistics Pro
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 4,093
Likes: 14
From: Lind, WA- Eastern WA
Jagged edge

Ssee the irregular cut by the square hole in the frame?
 
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2016 | 07:34 AM
  #25  
Brian1971f100's Avatar
Brian1971f100
Posting Guru
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 1,412
Likes: 1
From: Barre Mass

I think the frame has been altered. What is very interesting is the union that was put in. I understand that the truck is 50 years old and I would expect brake lines would have needed replacing but the location of the union support my belief.


What does the tail light pigtail look like? Spliced? Missing? Curiosity has me wondering.
 
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2016 | 06:59 PM
  #26  
Uni Moe's Avatar
Uni Moe
Laughing Gas
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 947
Likes: 6
From: Manitoba, Canada
Originally Posted by 351Cleveland C4
Upon closer look, I see weld joints in 3 places and I assume the 4th is simply hidden by the fuel tank.
I thought I could see those too. Welds can be ground quite smooth. That section also doesn't have the usual factory holes all through it.
 
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2017 | 11:36 AM
  #27  
mrpotatohead's Avatar
mrpotatohead
Thread Starter
|
Posting Guru
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,477
Likes: 7
From: NAMPA, ID.
Well I plan to start on this one after I finish my 69 F-250. I plan on pulling the cab off of the frame and completely going through this one. I'll just have to shorten the frame back to factory dimensions.
 
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2017 | 02:43 PM
  #28  
lvin4jc's Avatar
lvin4jc
Fleet Mechanic
15 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,346
Likes: 4
From: Rapid City, SoDak
Only because it hasn't been answered yet, my 131" truck also has a short driveshaft that goes into a carrier bearing and then the longer driveshaft.

I wonder about yours though, the longer one must be much longer..
 
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2017 | 02:52 PM
  #29  
mrpotatohead's Avatar
mrpotatohead
Thread Starter
|
Posting Guru
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,477
Likes: 7
From: NAMPA, ID.
I would be real curious to know the length of your rear driveshaft. Is yours a 4x4?
 
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2017 | 04:52 PM
  #30  
lvin4jc's Avatar
lvin4jc
Fleet Mechanic
15 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,346
Likes: 4
From: Rapid City, SoDak
Originally Posted by mrpotatohead
I would be real curious to know the length of your rear driveshaft. Is yours a 4x4?
Well then you owe me because it's snowing outside and my bed isn't off so I have to crawl under, lol Just Kidding

I get 43" total length at the longest point. i.e. not center to center on the u-joints, total length past the u-joints.

Also, this is just the long driveshaft by itself. There's a yoke coming off of the splines of the carrier bearing, I didn't measure any of that but it adds close to a foot. I assume yours has the same thing so they would be the same?

Mine is a 2wd.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:22 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE