When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
There are no weld joints. The frame as I said is solid, unspliced and original looking. When I bought it I noticed that they had added fish plates to the inside of the frame. I asked him about it and he said that they had a feeder mechanism of some sort on this thing and that they braced the frame with these plates. Again, I ground around on the frame with a flapper wheel and can find no area where it was welded together. It's all smooth top and bottom. The vin says its a long bed (131 inch wheelbase) and that it's a conventional cab, 67 f-100 4x4. ??
I agree, I would expect to see some joints in the frame where it was extended but it simply isn't there. The rails are unmolested, they have the gradual curves etc. Here are some pictures I took today.
That is the edge of the c-channel. I've been welding for years, there would be evidence on the outside of the frame rail of any sectioning. That's all.
Anyway, ford never made one that length, and ford didn't build the frames to begin with, they were outsourced from another company. I don't remember the name off hand.
So I find it highly unlikely that ford would ask for a special length frame without ordering enough of them to pay for the retool.
It's been modified somewhere, you're just not seeing it. You said yourself it's a one owner rig, and that the tag says 131" wheelbase. Obviously it's not 131, so where's the stretch??
Anyway, ford never made one that length, and ford didn't build the frames to begin with, they were outsourced from another company. I don't remember the name off hand.
So I find it highly unlikely that ford would ask for a special length frame without ordering enough of them to pay for the retool.
It's been modified somewhere, you're just not seeing it. You said yourself it's a one owner rig, and that the tag says 131" wheelbase. Obviously it's not 131, so where's the stretch??
Slightly to the left of your circle look at the innermost C channel. Not original!
I think the frame has been altered. What is very interesting is the union that was put in. I understand that the truck is 50 years old and I would expect brake lines would have needed replacing but the location of the union support my belief.
What does the tail light pigtail look like? Spliced? Missing? Curiosity has me wondering.
Well I plan to start on this one after I finish my 69 F-250. I plan on pulling the cab off of the frame and completely going through this one. I'll just have to shorten the frame back to factory dimensions.
I would be real curious to know the length of your rear driveshaft. Is yours a 4x4?
Well then you owe me because it's snowing outside and my bed isn't off so I have to crawl under, lol Just Kidding
I get 43" total length at the longest point. i.e. not center to center on the u-joints, total length past the u-joints.
Also, this is just the long driveshaft by itself. There's a yoke coming off of the splines of the carrier bearing, I didn't measure any of that but it adds close to a foot. I assume yours has the same thing so they would be the same?