Death Shake
you have bad components in the front end...
check all tie rods, ball joints, wheel bearings. youll find your problem.
as for tires, military oz 37's are a great compromise between road driving and mud/snow. theyre cheap as dirt, and can take a beating. theyre also on the heavy side, but ive never cared.
So, just for another point of view, here is what causes Death Wobble in my opinion: Any bouncing of one tire whether in or out (bad ball joints) or up and down (bad shocks especially with larger tires) or front to back (bad tie rods or steering drag link) or all of the above types of bounce due to bad tire balance exacerbated by too much wheel offset (which acts as a lever on the suspension and steering components).
Basically what happens is that one tire hits a hard bump and it "punches" that bounce (like an air filled rubber basketball) through the tie rod to the other tire which flexes its sidewall and then punches back and starts bouncing back and forth and then repeats so that a harmonic resonance propogates which will only stop when the vehicle slows to nearly a stop.
The larger the tires the bigger the problem. Think about it. Your frame, your suspension, your hydraulic steering box,** your shock absorber diameter, volume and valving are all designed to handle the punch of a tire and wheel combo of a certain mass (weight). The stock suspension can (sometimes barely) effectively dampen that amount of mass, but it can't effectively dampen a mass larger than it was designed for. So you must increase dampening to prevent that mass from propogating DW. That's what dual opposing gas pressurized shock absorbers do. They increase tire dampening laterally through the tie rod, just like your shock absorbers increase tire dampening vertically.
After spending $3,000 to make sure that everything was tight in the front axle, I dampened the bouncing rubber tires so that they could not propogate that bounce through the tie rod by buying and then modding by welding up a Rough Country dual stabilizer set up and then using Bilstein dual opposing gas pressurized shocks instead of steering stabilizers (because dual opposing steering stabilizers put resistance on the steering box both ways, while dual opposing gas pressurized shocks cancel out each other to eliminate resistance to the steering box.) Pictures of set ups are here:
http://www.sportsmobileforum.com/vie...obble&start=45
Just for giggles, go ahead and tighten up your steering box and see if that doesn't INCREASE your Death Wobble. How can tightening up your steering components actually increase DW? Because you are making it more efficient for the one tire to push its punch through the tie rod to the other tire and then for the other tire to punch back and so forth.
I suggest you balance your tires and replace your shocks if they aren't new and have the rest of the steering components looked at for looseness and by all means replace any worn steering and suspension components. Then consider the set up I have gone to and many others have too.
*BTW if you search long enough, you will find DW on NEW Ford and Dodge trucks discussed on the forums. You can't have a tighter suspension than a new suspension, yet if a particular vehicle is prone to DW it will, new or old.
** Yes, in my opinion a hydraulic steering box in addition to steering the wheels acts as a tie rod dampener.
I ask which d60 you have cuz that matters.
Trending Topics
That said, I thought that the F250 came with a Dana 50 TTB not a Dana 44 TTB.
Edit: 89F2urd: Also, I am concerned that it may not be "confirmed" about his pivot bushing. I am hoping he could post a video of it or provide a measurement of how far it moves passenger to driver and back.
...The ball joints are new as well as the arms. I can lift up the front and move the arm to the pass wheel because the bushing is gone. Maybe I'm not explaining something correctly...
* And I don't want to **** anybody off because you guys likely know more than me and I will be wanting your help on my 5.8L issues...
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Along the lines of what Tim Hodgson was saying, my tie rod, the one that goes tire to tire, is noticeably more flexible than the drag link. I think I was just kicking stuff as I'm currently mad at it but noticed that the drag link was very solid when I kicked it, but the tire rod was noticeably less solid. Not the pivots, the solid metal rod parts.
I can see this could let the tires toe in/out in a wiggly sort of way.
That said, I thought that the F250 came with a Dana 50 TTB not a Dana 44 TTB.
Edit: 89F2urd: Also, I am concerned that it may not be "confirmed" about his pivot bushing. I am hoping he could post a video of it or provide a measurement of how far it moves passenger to driver and back.
* And I don't want to **** anybody off because you guys likely know more than me and I will be wanting your help on my 5.8L issues...
whos panties are in a bunch?
the dana 50 didn't come standard in f250's until later, sometime in the 90's. ive seen them in brick nose trucks, but theyre mostly in big block and diesel trucks. the light duty 5.0's and even the HD 351's largely came with 44's.
the 44 and 50 ttb's share most of the same parts, the outers being the main differences between the two. 50 uses same outers as d60's, and the 44's use, well, 44 outers.
it may not be confirmed...but gotta take it at face value. have no choice, we aren't going to look at his truck for him. im always skeptical in these kinds of threads myself, because im not positive people truly tested their components to be good despite their claims they did so.
I think its relatively safe to assume his pivot bushing is bad, since it seems that its deteriorated to the point that he has obvious movement that is hard to miss.
The OP has 2 posts.
The OP says he has new TTB arms. How in the heck do you have new TTB arms and not a new pivot bushing? *
Yes, IMO the OP has a responsibility at this point to show us the movement in his pivot bushing with a video or pictures or measurements. It is only fair, he is asking for your help and the help of others here.
What I hate to see is a bunch of brothers fighting amongst ourselves over a 2-post OP who won't even come back to post something which shows the problem better.
He is making us work without the necessary info.
He shouldn't make us fight too.
I didn't mean to offend you. You know more than me. And I would like to be able to call on your advice in the future.
But the OP should put up or shut up.
* And if the OP's prior owner had a new pivot bushing installed when the new arms were installed, then the allegedly bad pivot bushing is likely not the cause of the DW, but is the effect of the DW. See, I am getting drawn into the OP's bull***t again...
** I guess I am the one with my panties in a bunch over this. We have had "help vampires" over at another forum I frequent. They throw a piece of red meat in front of dogs and then watch them fight over it. I am sick of that. There is a poster here by the name of "realslowww" who is constantly doing the same thing in the various engine forums.
The OP may be a stand up kinda guy who has just got busy and hasn't had time to come back to this post. Or he may be a lazy a$$ liberal who doesn't have the courtesy to realize that he has asked for help and has a duty (which my dad referred to as "common courtesy") to respond, because he thinks that the internet and your time is "free." Nothing is free. Not the knowledge and experienced you've gained. And not your time trying to help by sharing it. I've never met the OP. I don't know his character. But I will tell you this: If the OP won't do his job by meeting us half-way we should note his username and just move on... Please accept my apology.







