When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
It's too bad Anthony is, so far from me cause he would be working on my truck, he's the only one I would trust besides myself.....and there are a few other exceptions to that statement
People on this forum talked me out if! something to the effect of by 2007 they had the head bolt robots calibrated?
-also worried if i pull the heads, ill want to rebuild them.. then ill have the engine out.
Still considering head studs? pros and cons of head studs on an 07 engine?
I thought it was pretty common knowledge about the TTY robot going past the yield on the head bolts, which makes the bolts weaker and easier to stretch. Prior to buying mine in '05, they had found the issue and changed calibration on their machines.
Now, that doesn't mean the '05 and newer will not have issues, just not as common unless hot tunes are loaded and ran hard.
Me personally I would leave the TTY bolts in there, but I don't plan on tuning my truck other then a possible FICM tune. Now if the headgaskets ever let go, there is no way the TTYs would go back in.
Justin - I am not saying that it isn't true (I am skeptical though), but I would LOVE to know if there was ANY Ford or International documentation on that!
When you say common knowledge, where did the information originate?
I recall a fair amount of discussion on inconsistant torquing in the EARLY days, but the scuttlebut then was that that was taken care of more quickly than 2005. Even that was never substantated as far as I can recall.
Who knows, maybe Ford kept it 100% quiet because the early model year folks would be asking for reimbursements on their head gasket work ......... but if it truly is common knowledge, there must be an official source for it.
Make sure and get yourself the correct oil cooler. I think there are Dorman coolers for sale out there that are attractive because of their price, but the gaskets fail and clog the system.
The subject of assembly line robots being out of calibration in the early years has been posted several times here and on other forums, mostly here at FTE though. A quick search will bring up posts back to 2008. I did see several where bismic asked about verifiable references and got no response.
so after some debate with myself, i decided to pull the cab and heads, ad do studs. I'm glad i did, i found other problems along the way.
To anyone thats never done it before, it took me (someone who until yesterday morning had never touched a 6 liter) 7 hours to go from running truck, to cab off, short block in the frame.
When i drained the coolant i found some kind of black particle in it. It looks like dirt, but it is not grainy like dirt, when i rub it between my fingers i cant feel it.
I don't know how this stuff can be in the engine after a coolant flush that was extremely through.
I'm really thinking about a remote oil cooler, I'm in no hurry to pull my truck apart again.
Justin - I am not saying that it isn't true (I am skeptical though), but I would LOVE to know if there was ANY Ford or International documentation on that!
When you say common knowledge, where did the information originate?
I recall a fair amount of discussion on inconsistant torquing in the EARLY days, but the scuttlebut then was that that was taken care of more quickly than 2005. Even that was never substantated as far as I can recall.
Who knows, maybe Ford kept it 100% quiet because the early model year folks would be asking for reimbursements on their head gasket work ......... but if it truly is common knowledge, there must be an official source for it.
Well, I never had any documentation. There were a couple instantances where I talked with Ford certified mechanics at three different dealerships about the issues with the 6.0 (this was within 6 months of buying mine). They all indicated that the TTY problem had been corrected and the best thing you could do for a 6.0 was regular coolant flushes.
Its hard to tell if they were blowing smoke or not but dealer mechanics are located roughly 100 miles apart and I basically got the same answer from all. Also, these dealers have never given me a reason not to trust them.
so after some debate with myself, i decided to pull the cab and heads, ad do studs. I'm glad i did, i found other problems along the way.
To anyone thats never done it before, it took me (someone who until yesterday morning had never touched a 6 liter) 7 hours to go from running truck, to cab off, short block in the frame.
When i drained the coolant i found some kind of black particle in it. It looks like dirt, but it is not grainy like dirt, when i rub it between my fingers i cant feel it.
I don't know how this stuff can be in the engine after a coolant flush that was extremely through.
I'm really thinking about a remote oil cooler, I'm in no hurry to pull my truck apart again.
You won't regret it, especially if you plan to tow with tunes.
I would still love to know exactly what the change was that they made in assembly. I do recall a torque procedure change being discussed, but I suppose I will always be skeptical about its significance.
Of more significance (in my mind anyway) is that the OP blew his head gaskets w/ a BD chip and was expecting head gasket work to happen under warranty.
I think one of the biggest changes over the years was with the programming in the aftermarket tuners - took awhile to learn the "better" (I won't say "safer") ways to make power.
I would still love to know exactly what the change was that they made in assembly. I do recall a torque procedure change being discussed, but I suppose I will always be skeptical about its significance.
Of more significance (in my mind anyway) is that the OP blew his head gaskets w/ a BD chip and was expecting head gasket work to happen under warranty.
It would be nice to know exactly.
From what I was told, there is a min and max on the torque yield of the bolts. Let's just say the min is 200 and max is 240. In the area between 200 and 240 the bolts have elasticity and will not stretch. Now if the bolts were already torqued to 240, they are at the edge of their yield and elasticity, any over boost or additional head pressure creation would cause them to stretch.
Still, no concrete evidence. This is just what I was told.
Now now Anthony. Don't be saying that. You're scaring me real bad. My truck is an '07. So far, knock wood, my doesn't blow coolant out of the bottle or lose it. Down the road though, I may actually need your services and you're about 16 hours away from me which sucks.
These trucks keep coming in,,,, and I'm gonna pull my wallet out and try n get you to relocate!!!!! How big of a house do you want Mike???? Lol
I remember some of the 03's had head bolts that were not torqued correctly. But they fixed that before 04 anyway. The TTY bolts just don't work on our trucks period.
I remember some of the 03's had head bolts that were not torqued correctly. But they fixed that before 04 anyway. The TTY bolts just don't work on our trucks period.
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level
Slideshow: The VelociRaptor Expedition gains a lift, upgraded suspension, Brembo brakes, and trail-ready equipment while retaining the stock 440-horsepower EcoBoost V6.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.