Notices
6.0L Power Stroke Diesel 2003 - 2007 F250, F350 pickup and F350+ Cab Chassis, 2003 - 2005 Excursion and 2003 - 2009 van

Annoying P0401 Code

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 16, 2014 | 10:37 PM
  #16  
Bullitt390's Avatar
Bullitt390
Certified Thread Hijacker
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 14,441
Likes: 58
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by Wyatt66f100
I have my money on the maf sensor. The engine isn't delivering enough fuel to get more boost because it thinks not enough air is entering the engine. Also in factory training they say to never try to clean a maf sensor. I've done it before but it never was dead on after that. It read better on data logger but was still a little off. Fuel pressure good?
To set the P0401 the IAT2 would need to show little to no increase in temp in relation to EGR valve movement.

Either a stuck valve from carbon marbles or exhaust leak.

Josh
 
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2014 | 08:06 AM
  #17  
Towzilla's Avatar
Towzilla
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Snuggyworm
hello sir. any other codes besides tat p0401 code?
No other codes and the truck runs great both in city driving and highway. It does not lack for acceleration and power. I recently had the HPOP and ICP sensor replaced and at that time the P0401 code did not exist. I'm starting to think that when they reassembled it they either did not tighten a hose down properly or a hose has a slight leak in it. Now I did notice when I was inspecting the MAP sensor that the hose had been wrapped in electrical tape (not my doing) on the MAP sensor connection. Hmmmmmm. I'm replaing the MAP sensor and IAT2 tomorrow so I'll check that out tomorrow.
 
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2014 | 08:23 AM
  #18  
Bullitt390's Avatar
Bullitt390
Certified Thread Hijacker
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 14,441
Likes: 58
Club FTE Silver Member

They come with tape on the hose for whatever reason.

As for throwing parts at it you're going down a slippery slope.

Josh
 
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2014 | 08:27 AM
  #19  
Towzilla's Avatar
Towzilla
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Bullitt390
They come with tape on the hose for whatever reason.

As for throwing parts at it you're going down a slippery slope.

Josh
As far as what? Introducing new problems?

Mike
 
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2014 | 08:38 AM
  #20  
Bullitt390's Avatar
Bullitt390
Certified Thread Hijacker
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 14,441
Likes: 58
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by Towzilla
As far as what? Introducing new problems?

Mike
Wasting money on parts you do not need... Check for an exhaust leak

Josh
 
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2014 | 01:20 PM
  #21  
Snuggyworm's Avatar
Snuggyworm
Postmaster
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 3,263
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Originally Posted by Towzilla
As far as what? Introducing new problems? Mike
Hi mike, yes I would check for leaks first and make sure everything is seated on right and tightened good before buying stuff.

U can pull out the egr valve and start running the truck but leave it plugged into connector. U should be able to see the vanes move up and down. U might need to have someone romp on the skinny pedal while u pay attention to the egr valve.

Dom

Sent from my iPhone using IB AutoGroup
 
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2014 | 07:25 PM
  #22  
Wyatt66f100's Avatar
Wyatt66f100
Elder User
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 516
Likes: 8
From: Milwaukie, Oregon
P0401 is a conditional code. So that means that the PCM sees it as something has happened and is a result of that something the PCM is telling you what it can see. That a reading is out of the normal. If it was a circuit issue it would read as a egr valve high or low circuit code and is a hard fault. Seems that we are unable to know if there are leaks without being there looking at the truck. And we don't know what sensor is reading out because we cannot see the readings for his engine over the internet. I'm just throwing Ideas out there as well. Also to answer the other question about why isn't it setting a lean code, lean code do not exist on Diesel engines. A gas motor would run a little funny rich or lean with a messed up maf sensor. Diesels run better with bad maf sensors because they do not have a mixture of 14.7 to 1 like gas engines. The mixture dictates the rpm. So the more the ratio of air to fuel changes the more the RPGs change. This is why diesels don't have throttle bodies that control main engine air flow. It's completely controlled by injector fuel flow. So if a bad maf sensor was on a diesel it would read that voltage as an input to the fuel controls, not like a major input that would effect the way it runs like a gas motor. Dirty maf sensors read a small amount less air flow then clean ones. So a lower voltage. So if the PCM wants to see a amount of air flow at a certain rpm and it's lower, it will read that missing air flow as egr flow if the egr valve is open during that time. Making more sense? Exhaust and intake leaks will effect these readings in the same way. They just won't cause the code to set as quickly as it is unless it is a massive leak. That's why I was steered in this direction.
 
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2014 | 07:54 PM
  #23  
Bullitt390's Avatar
Bullitt390
Certified Thread Hijacker
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 14,441
Likes: 58
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by Wyatt66f100
P0401 is a conditional code. So that means that the PCM sees it as something has happened and is a result of that something the PCM is telling you what it can see. That a reading is out of the normal. If it was a circuit issue it would read as a egr valve high or low circuit code and is a hard fault. Seems that we are unable to know if there are leaks without being there looking at the truck. And we don't know what sensor is reading out because we cannot see the readings for his engine over the internet. I'm just throwing Ideas out there as well. Also to answer the other question about why isn't it setting a lean code, lean code do not exist on Diesel engines. A gas motor would run a little funny rich or lean with a messed up maf sensor. Diesels run better with bad maf sensors because they do not have a mixture of 14.7 to 1 like gas engines. The mixture dictates the rpm. So the more the ratio of air to fuel changes the more the RPGs change. This is why diesels don't have throttle bodies that control main engine air flow. It's completely controlled by injector fuel flow. So if a bad maf sensor was on a diesel it would read that voltage as an input to the fuel controls, not like a major input that would effect the way it runs like a gas motor. Dirty maf sensors read a small amount less air flow then clean ones. So a lower voltage. So if the PCM wants to see a amount of air flow at a certain rpm and it's lower, it will read that missing air flow as egr flow if the egr valve is open during that time. Making more sense? Exhaust and intake leaks will effect these readings in the same way. They just won't cause the code to set as quickly as it is unless it is a massive leak. That's why I was steered in this direction.
The PCM uses the MAF signal to correlate the opening of the EGR. Cannot have the EGR open too much with very little air flow (i.e. idle versus acceleration versus WOT)

The P0401 is set by the EGR desired does not match the actual and also the IAT2 not picking up a corresponding increase in air temp in relation to valve opening.

Most common causes:

Coked up EGR valve
"Marbles" in the EGR intake runner
Exhaust leak.

Hence that engine had just been done, I would reckon the most likely culprit is an exhaust leak on the EGR up-pipe.

Josh
 
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2014 | 10:57 PM
  #24  
dlibson's Avatar
dlibson
Hotshot
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 15,438
Likes: 3
From: Hampstead, NC
That or a bad map or iat2.
 
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2021 | 08:06 AM
  #25  
Mariodag's Avatar
Mariodag
New User
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
P0401 code with a EGR delete

Thanks for all the information guys. I just bought my first diesel (6.0) a couple months ago and it has the EGR delete so when getting this code I was like wtf? When cleared it doesn't come back right away so I'm leaning more towards an exhaust leak. Going to watch some diesel tech ron videos to see where the leak may be from 🙂
 
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2021 | 08:50 AM
  #26  
IHateCommieCars's Avatar
IHateCommieCars
Logistics Pro
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,668
Likes: 526
From: Houston, Texas
Welcome to FTE, maddag. SYK, you're part of the family now - you can come in the front door! Ya don't gotta drag this dead cat (eek, Sean) of a thread in the back door, lol.

Still, my advice to you would be the same I was going to give the "annoyed" OP: chill, bro, as a 6.0 owner, you're going to see plenty of DTCs. You're still running; you're still good, lol. Otherwise, from the first half-dozen posts I read before realizing how old this thread is, I'll bet every possible explanation for that code is in the thread somewhere. Maybe someone could post the Ford procedures, but they prolly don't apply to a delete.
 
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2021 | 11:12 AM
  #27  
Mariodag's Avatar
Mariodag
New User
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by IHateCommieCars
Welcome to FTE, maddag. SYK, you're part of the family now - you can come in the front door! Ya don't gotta drag this dead cat (eek, Sean) of a thread in the back door, lol.

Still, my advice to you would be the same I was going to give the "annoyed" OP: chill, bro, as a 6.0 owner, you're going to see plenty of DTCs. You're still running; you're still good, lol. Otherwise, from the first half-dozen posts I read before realizing how old this thread is, I'll bet every possible explanation for that code is in the thread somewhere. Maybe someone could post the Ford procedures, but they prolly don't apply to a delete.
It's a 2005 ford excursion that I bought and I must say the previous owner took pretty good care of it. It's runs top notch, without any smoke coming out of the exhaust so that's a good start lol. Still have to go through a dreaded Canadian weather here, so that will be the true test of it .
Thanks for the nice welcome
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ScottInTexas
2004 - 2008 F150
2
Apr 22, 2012 12:49 PM
deejdeej
1983 - 2012 Ranger & B-Series
4
Jun 10, 2010 09:51 PM
COramprat
1997 - 2006 Expedition & Navigator
2
Aug 19, 2004 11:01 AM
99pickup
1983 - 2012 Ranger & B-Series
14
Jul 27, 2004 02:04 PM
natencela
1997 - 2006 Expedition & Navigator
3
Apr 18, 2003 09:37 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:00 AM.