Pre-Power Stroke Diesel (7.3L IDI & 6.9L) Diesel Topics Only

IDI Turbo vs Powerstroke

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 09-05-2016, 08:42 AM
jayro88's Avatar
jayro88
jayro88 is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,943
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by Macrobb
Y'know, looking at Racin's post from 4 years ago vs today? I'd say the situation is completely different.
When it's possible to get 450 WHP out of an IDI... who needs the newer trucks? And even if the parts to do that are expensive... it would still be far less than a newer truck and tuner to get that same WHP.

You are still talking about a reliable mechanical engine vs a newer computerized and far more expensive engine. And if you do manage to break it, parts are *far* cheaper.
Exactly! If you can do the work yourself I would bet that you would come out ahead purchasing an IDI in good shape and then doing the upgrades vs purchasing a newer diesel. It would be important that you could do most the work yourself, since the mechanical nature of the IDI makes it more labor intensive to make changes that can be gone with tuning on a more modern/electrical controlled engine.

For real power you are looking at upgrading the turbo, installing an intercooler, cam, IP/Injectors, head studs and maybe the support girdle for the mains that was created. From Racin's experiment we know that you would want atleast want to start with a factory turbo engine for stronger rods, or upgrade those to the new PSD rods IDI Performance is developing. I really wonder what kind of abuse the stock IDI turbo rods would handle.

But wait......It's not a direct injection motor, so there's no way you can make a lot of power with it.........
 
  #17  
Old 09-05-2016, 10:00 AM
Pkupman82's Avatar
Pkupman82
Pkupman82 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Muskegon, MI (home)
Posts: 3,441
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Well I have both, an 84 F250 RC LB 4x4 6.9 IDI and a 97 OBS 7.3 PSD F250 SC LB 4x2. I guess I could say I'm a little more biased towards the IDI, but I've had that truck a lot longer than the PSD. Last fall the 6.9 gave up the ghost, a blown head gasket. Up until then it had an untraceable hard starting issue, and excessive oil consumption. It had a hard life of snow plowing, hauling and towing heavy loads it always served me well, and ran pretty good doing it. The complete teardown revealed not only the blown head gasket, but nearly every valve was sucked into the heads and the cam bearings were wiped. I decided to go through with a complete and thorough rebuild. The project has been moving very slowly, I'm not too far from lighting this baby up for the first time. I am really curious how it measures up to the 97 for power, fuel economy, etc. Of course the 6.9 couldn't go back together without some upgrades, besides a full rebuild (full machine shop treatment, hot tanking, bored, honed, pistons, rings, bearings, freeze plugs, etc) a Banks Sidewinder, R&D cam, bigger exhaust, E-pump, rebuilt IP, new injectors, etc. I predict it will either run with the PSD, if not slightly edge it out. The PSD is basically stock (for now) other than the upgraded downpipe and muffler delete. They both have their good and bad points, I like em both. I would have to say the big win for the IDI is simplicity and low cost. There is most definitely something cool about running one of these 20-30 year old trucks, they do get the looks.
 
  #18  
Old 09-05-2016, 10:25 AM
Resendiz's Avatar
Resendiz
Resendiz is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 1,026
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Pkupman82
Well I have both, an 84 F250 RC LB 4x4 6.9 IDI and a 97 OBS 7.3 PSD F250 SC LB 4x2. I guess I could say I'm a little more biased towards the IDI, but I've had that truck a lot longer than the PSD. Last fall the 6.9 gave up the ghost, a blown head gasket. Up until then it had an untraceable hard starting issue, and excessive oil consumption. It had a hard life of snow plowing, hauling and towing heavy loads it always served me well, and ran pretty good doing it. The complete teardown revealed not only the blown head gasket, but nearly every valve was sucked into the heads and the cam bearings were wiped. I decided to go through with a complete and thorough rebuild. The project has been moving very slowly, I'm not too far from lighting this baby up for the first time. I am really curious how it measures up to the 97 for power, fuel economy, etc. Of course the 6.9 couldn't go back together without some upgrades, besides a full rebuild (full machine shop treatment, hot tanking, bored, honed, pistons, rings, bearings, freeze plugs, etc) a Banks Sidewinder, R&D cam, bigger exhaust, E-pump, rebuilt IP, new injectors, etc. I predict it will either run with the PSD, if not slightly edge it out. The PSD is basically stock (for now) other than the upgraded downpipe and muffler delete. They both have their good and bad points, I like em both. I would have to say the big win for the IDI is simplicity and low cost. There is most definitely something cool about running one of these 20-30 year old trucks, they do get the looks.
Awesome post. In a weird way, I want my 6.9 to go out so that I can rebuild it. Kinda like my woman wants to accidentally wake the baby up when she wants to play hehe.

How much will the rebuild cost you if you do the work yourself? I know that some things need to get done by the pros, like a machine shop, but the rest? I would like to know exactly how your rebuild goes. The truck in my avatar had a blown head gasket so i paid for a complete rebuild back in 2012. Paid about $3700 I believe. about 6 months ago I paid for my 86 uhaul 7.3 rebuild, $3,400, then a little over a month ago, i had the 94' uhaul 7.3 rebuild $4700. I didn't trust the $3400 guys so i went with another guy and paid a little extra for much better service (communication, speed).

Anyways, those were for my uhauls so I wasnt to worried about anything specific. I still would rather go into the engine myself for the 6.9 since its my personal vehicle. Knowing EXACTLY what was done to the engine would be pretty damn sweet. Who knows what parts these mechanics didn't replace just to save some $.

I hope you open a thread and post pictures and info on your progress.
 
  #19  
Old 09-05-2016, 10:34 AM
Shawn MacAnanny's Avatar
Shawn MacAnanny
Shawn MacAnanny is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Felton, Delaware
Posts: 776
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I have both, well until my IDIT was totalled. I get about 1-2mpg better with my auto PSD having just a kN intake, 4" exhaust, tuner and the exact same bed. my PSD is a RCLB but 4x4 dually, and my IDIT was a CCLB 2wd dually. Same exact bed on them the IDIT weighed 8700lbs the PSD weighs 8600lbs. The IDIT with all the mods in my sig moved just as well as my PSD with a towing tune from my CTS programmer. I like the IDIT for simplicity, but purchased another IDI non turbo and plan to keep it that way for even further simplicity. Once the mechanical lift pump and fuel filter are eliminated it's ones of the cleanest diesel engine bays you can work in.

I've actually come to like daily driving my PSD over my old IDIT though. It's an auto and the PSD feels like it makes more power down low. It seems to have a better power band.
 
  #20  
Old 09-05-2016, 12:12 PM
DarkOverCast's Avatar
DarkOverCast
DarkOverCast is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 2,036
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Resendiz
Agreed. Not the most comfortable (especially bench seats), but fun to drive.

Friggen belts cost $1.75 on rockauto.com!
Get the bench seats out of the lariat models A+ comfort. Best bench seat out there!
 
  #21  
Old 09-05-2016, 01:25 PM
Pkupman82's Avatar
Pkupman82
Pkupman82 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Muskegon, MI (home)
Posts: 3,441
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Shawn MacAnanny
I have both, well until my IDIT was totalled. I get about 1-2mpg better with my auto PSD having just a kN intake, 4" exhaust, tuner and the exact same bed. my PSD is a RCLB but 4x4 dually, and my IDIT was a CCLB 2wd dually. Same exact bed on them the IDIT weighed 8700lbs the PSD weighs 8600lbs. The IDIT with all the mods in my sig moved just as well as my PSD with a towing tune from my CTS programmer. I like the IDIT for simplicity, but purchased another IDI non turbo and plan to keep it that way for even further simplicity. Once the mechanical lift pump and fuel filter are eliminated it's ones of the cleanest diesel engine bays you can work in.

I've actually come to like daily driving my PSD over my old IDIT though. It's an auto and the PSD feels like it makes more power down low. It seems to have a better power band.
I have to agree with you on that, I really like my 97 PSD. The power is great, but it has more creature comforts and a better ride (comparing a leaf sprung solid axle to a twin I beam, I know not fair) As much as I love a bulletproof C6, the E4OD is much nicer for highway cruising. One thing I know about the IDI, I could pound the snot out of it empty or loaded it didn't care. It's just an old simple tough heavy duty truck, there is a lot to be said for that too.
 
  #22  
Old 09-05-2016, 08:10 PM
Macrobb's Avatar
Macrobb
Macrobb is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,860
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Shawn MacAnanny
I've actually come to like daily driving my PSD over my old IDIT though. It's an auto and the PSD feels like it makes more power down low
As someone with a stick who does quite a bit of driving down low, I've found that getting an IDI to perform well down low requires some tuning. As the amount of fuel injected is lower, the timing is much more finicky on our IPs down low, and I've had to do a lot of messing to get a good 'curve'; something that'll give me good power down low without losing anything in the boost band.

On top of that, I think if we had a VGT on an IDI, the low end power problems would be totally gone. Give it a few PSI of boost at idle and you'd have tons of take-off power.
The normal turbos just don't really do anything at all below 1600-1800 RPM, so you are at NA power levels there.
 
  #23  
Old 09-05-2016, 11:57 PM
88 Ford IDI's Avatar
88 Ford IDI
88 Ford IDI is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,523
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jayro88
Exactly! If you can do the work yourself I would bet that you would come out ahead purchasing an IDI in good shape and then doing the upgrades vs purchasing a newer diesel. It would be important that you could do most the work yourself, since the mechanical nature of the IDI makes it more labor intensive to make changes that can be gone with tuning on a more modern/electrical controlled engine.

For real power you are looking at upgrading the turbo, installing an intercooler, cam, IP/Injectors, head studs and maybe the support girdle for the mains that was created. From Racin's experiment we know that you would want atleast want to start with a factory turbo engine for stronger rods, or upgrade those to the new PSD rods IDI Performance is developing. I really wonder what kind of abuse the stock IDI turbo rods would handle.

But wait......It's not a direct injection motor, so there's no way you can make a lot of power with it.........
I believe the stock NA rods are good to about 300-350hp. So depending on the desired power its not always necessary for the turbo engine. But yes the turbo engine rods or PSD rods are definitely stronger than NA rods...
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dyoungen
Pre-Power Stroke Diesel (7.3L IDI & 6.9L)
12
08-20-2010 10:19 PM
ghunt
Pre-Power Stroke Diesel (7.3L IDI & 6.9L)
1
10-17-2007 08:08 PM
xjvince
Pre-Power Stroke Diesel (7.3L IDI & 6.9L)
16
12-13-2006 07:00 PM
2000 Superduty
6.0L Power Stroke Diesel
3
11-12-2003 09:07 AM
SBV45
6.0L Power Stroke Diesel
16
09-25-2003 07:13 AM



Quick Reply: IDI Turbo vs Powerstroke



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:18 AM.