Notices
1978 - 1996 Big Bronco  
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

4.9 / T18 mating project

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 18, 2012 | 08:07 PM
  #1  
zachsmith's Avatar
zachsmith
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
4.9 / T18 mating project

I have two Broncos - an '83 and an '86. This post pertains to combining the engine from one and the tranny from the other Bronco and is a continuation of the conversation had here: https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/1...g-matchup.html

My '83 has a 4.9 engine with a 4-speed Tremec RTS OverDrive transmission and a mechanically actuated clutch. The truck runs amazingly with over 100k miles on it. But, sadly, I rolled it while on an off-road trail ride. The drive train is still sound though, proven by the fact that after returning the greasy side down it started right up and I drove it away.

My newly purchased '86 is destined to provide the replacement body and parts to make my '83 chassis whole again. The '86 has an EFI 302 with either a 4-speed Borg-Warner T-18 manual or a 4-speed New Process NP435 manual transmission and a hydraulically actuated clutch. The tranny has a granny first (non-synchronized). If it matters, I will know which transmission in a day or so when I get it on a lift to inspect. For expediency I will refer to this transmission as a "T18" unless proven otherwise.

I want to combine my 4.9 engine with the T18 tranny and the transfer case it is attached to on my '83 chassis (I have done a frame-off, powder coated restoration and a 4 inch suspension lift) and then cover it all with the (non-squished) '86 body.

My questions are as follows:

1) Which clutch would be better to keep (mechanical or hydraulic)? The '86 body has the hydraulic already in place, but I'm thinking the mechanical would be more reliable.

2) Can I use the flywheel from the 4.9 on the input shaft of the T18 with the existing hydraulic clutch that was previously mated to the 302 (basically bolting the 4.9 and T18 together with the 4.9 flywheel but no other major modifications)?

3) Alternately, could I utilize the entire bell housing and mechanical clutch from the 4.9, mating this bell housing from the Tremec RTS to the T18 tranny?

4) Would there be any additional parts required other than the ones I already have on one of the two trucks?

5) Would there be any issues with the starter on this new 4.9 / T18 setup?

6) What are the "gotcha" mistakes that I should be careful to avoid making?

7) Finally, I have 4.10 gears on the '83 with 33" tires. With this setup I didn't notice a major difference in RPM in any gear from when I had small wheels and stock gears (this was the intent when we calculated which gears to utilize). With this in mind, would you say that the 4.10 gears are a bad idea with the T18 tranny?

Wow, that's a lot! Thanks in advance for your consideration!

Zach
 
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2012 | 08:25 PM
  #2  
zachsmith's Avatar
zachsmith
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
The source of my problems

 

Last edited by zachsmith; Jan 18, 2012 at 08:26 PM. Reason: Picture way too big
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2012 | 09:35 AM
  #3  
AbandonedBronco's Avatar
AbandonedBronco
Moderator
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,987
Likes: 104
From: Boise, Idaho
Club FTE Gold Member
I don't have a whole lot of info on exact particulars, but I can give you my experience.

I have two Broncos that I drive all the time. One's for my wife, and one's for me. They both have 300s in them.

The '81 has the same Tremec O/D trans as your '83.
The '84 has the NP-435 granny trans. (BTW, you can identify it because, towards the rear of the vehicle, there's a big NP inside of a circle on the casing. It's right out in the open and easy to spot.)

Both clutches are very reliable, but I prefer the hydraulic. The mechanical needs adjusting about once a year or it'll start to catch. Plus, it takes a bit more leg strength to hold it down (not that I have a problem with that.) The hydraulic is just smooth and easy every time.

As for the gearing, it obviously depends on what you use it for, but I think you'll go crazy with the 4.10s and no overdrive with the T18/NP435.
With 33" tires, you'll be at 2500 RPMs @ 60mph where you'd normally be at 1780 with the overdrive.
65mph = 2700RPMs
75mph = 3150RPMs

Plus, with the insane granny gear that non-overdrive trans has (no matter which one it is), you'll never need those 4.10s unless you're doing something absolutely crazy.
In low range and granny, with my 3.55s and 31" tires (in the '84), I'm at around 4mph if I rev it up to 3000 RPMs. That's crawling...
Plus, I'm begging for an overdrive on the interstate. I can't imagine 4.10s.
 
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2012 | 07:31 PM
  #4  
zachsmith's Avatar
zachsmith
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Good info

That's good information. Thanks! By the way, how did you calculate the RPM's with a given gear / tire combo? Is there software that can do this? I could obviously do the math, but if there is an easier way, that would be cool.

Anyone know details about the flywheel?
 
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2012 | 08:06 PM
  #5  
AbandonedBronco's Avatar
AbandonedBronco
Moderator
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,987
Likes: 104
From: Boise, Idaho
Club FTE Gold Member
There are some, but it's just simply:

Engine RPM = (Speed * Transmission Gear * Final Drive * 336) / Tire Diameter
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2012 | 02:09 PM
  #6  
zachsmith's Avatar
zachsmith
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Well, I am confident that it is in fact a T18 because it does not "have a big NP inside a circle on the casing" but does have "Boerg Warner" stamped on it

Has anyone had experience with taking this tranny off the 302 and mating it onto a 300?
 
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2012 | 03:41 PM
  #7  
camekanix's Avatar
camekanix
Freshman User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Thanks to some info I recently got from some other members here the bellhousing bolt pattern should be the same between the 2 engines. Not sure about overall length but maybe you can used the driveshafts out of the same one as the trans is coming out of.
 
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2012 | 10:33 PM
  #8  
zachsmith's Avatar
zachsmith
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
I'm certain you are right. Thanks for the info!

What I am really needing is confirmation that I can mate the 300 flywheel up to the 302 clutch plate in the bell housing from the 302 without any other modifications. I've never tried this type of swap before . . .
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
enriched&beyound
Clutch, Transmission, Differential, Axle & Transfer Case
3
Apr 12, 2015 02:24 PM
61steven
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
15
Mar 19, 2014 02:52 PM
branpollard
Clutch, Transmission, Differential, Axle & Transfer Case
5
Mar 3, 2005 01:32 PM
Galaxie427
Clutch, Transmission, Differential, Axle & Transfer Case
18
Jul 7, 2004 10:20 PM
Rat wagon
1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
2
Oct 18, 2003 08:53 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:46 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE