Ford vs The Competition Technical discussion and comparison ONLY. Trolls will not be tolerated.

Smart Pickup vs ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 03-24-2012, 05:17 PM
monckywrench's Avatar
monckywrench
monckywrench is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,211
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Suburban light rail was purchased for disposal as a way to destroy competition in some areas.

General Motors streetcar conspiracy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

That's among the many reasons you can't get around the US efficiently by passenger rail. Since that option is dead forever, it's just an interesting historic footnote.

The Chrysler and Mitsu turbos of the 1980s (and a few Ford Mustangs) gave gasoline turbos a bad reputation.
The Chrysler/Mitsubishi 2.6 engines were garbage. Melling sold a lot of balance shaft eliminator kits and cast iron oil pumps to cure some of their problems.
 
  #17  
Old 03-24-2012, 06:07 PM
dkf's Avatar
dkf
dkf is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Pa
Posts: 10,101
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Suburban light rail was purchased for disposal as a way to destroy competition in some areas.

General Motors streetcar conspiracy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

That's among the many reasons you can't get around the US efficiently by passenger rail. Since that option is dead forever, it's just an interesting historic footnote.
It was more than likely inevitable anyway. Such passenger light rail transport would have been highly unionized and went bust due to overly high costs. Just look at the financials of companies like Amtrak. The majority of public transport as it exists today in the US is a financial black hole and a burden on the taxpayer.
 
  #18  
Old 03-24-2012, 06:42 PM
monckywrench's Avatar
monckywrench
monckywrench is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,211
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Public transport relieves vehicle burdens on crowded roads, and often continues to run when those roads are slowed or blocked. It facilitates access to urban areas where autos are already overloading road systems and available parking.

A comparison of taxpayer cost should take into account ALL direct and indirect subsidies, expenses, costs, and economic benefits. Cars and trucks are massively "subsidised" by tax-funded buildouts of infrastructure to support them.

Road v rail: Amtrak's true costs | The Economist

All our oil-powered vehicles (non-electric trains included) are literally "subsidised" by perpetual war and military deployments to protect oil trade routes and regional stability near producing countries. Trains are extremely efficient ways to move people and goods. That's less oil we much purchase for a given result.

No fair pretending that isn't real, and (outside the politics and the own-side casualties) it's stunningly expensive. We should remember our taxes pay for it

Amtrak gets a bit more than the annual US military aid to Egypt. That's chicken feed, and as gas prices rise rail will become even more economically important in getting workers to their jobs. Put them in cars and higher-capacity ROADS will be required. Those aren't free, and require disrupting crowded cities and towns, buying out property owners, and routing traffic around construction. Nothing is simple.

Amtrak ridership, revenue up - Washington Business Journal
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
freirefishing
General Automotive Discussion
17
02-22-2009 07:17 AM
officer131
Excursion - King of SUVs
68
05-14-2008 11:37 AM
Secret Agent 069
British Columbia
5
02-08-2008 02:10 AM
TOMHONE
General Automotive Discussion
1
02-02-2007 11:24 AM
mikecarson
1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
4
08-21-2005 12:17 PM



Quick Reply: Smart Pickup vs ?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:14 AM.