Notices
6.7L Power Stroke Diesel 2011-current Ford Powerstroke 6.7 L turbo diesel engine

OptiLube XPD

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 10, 2012 | 04:57 PM
  #31  
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 25,478
Likes: 738
From: Isanti, MN
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by rickatic
Great discussion...I use the PM22A...buy it by the gallon...but...the question remains; why do we have to use any of them at all? If Ford had provided a HPF system that reflected the real world fuel quality issues owners face out there every day...this conversation would not have to take place...just sayin...

Peace
But this thread isn't about that. Many of us would run additive regardless, and this isn't about whether the truck requires the additive or not.

I'm a fan of Power Service myself, but good recent data comparing these additives isn't easy to come by so I tend to keep my mouth shut!
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2012 | 06:42 PM
  #32  
Fontana's Avatar
Fontana
Senior User
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
From: Stafford Virginia
May I make a suggestion?

Due to water contamination concerns perhaps it would be a good idea to post a separator empty post informing everyone where it is, how to empty, and how often it may need to be emptied. One could use this same thread or start a new one. I would do it but I don't know how to post pictures. Thoughts???
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2012 | 07:09 PM
  #33  
'08FX4's Avatar
'08FX4
Senior User
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Pg 38 of the diesel engine supplement book has a great picture and instruction about it.

I'd copy and paste it here but I think it's copyrighted material.
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2012 | 07:17 PM
  #34  
rickatic's Avatar
rickatic
Postmaster
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,839
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by ljutic ss
You can also turn the question around and ask, why doesn't the refinery companies turn out a product that is more suitable for our needs. European diesel owners have a better fuel available to them then we do. It's a fact that a diesel fuel that's rated 50+ cetane rating burns cleaner then one that's 42 cetane. You need these higher numbers more then ever in colder weather.
While in principle, I would like to agree...but in reality, the fuel suppliers are now blending fuel to the current US standards. Why would they feel a need to increase their costs to provide fuel that exceeds requirements. Until higher fuel standards are put in place, the manufacturers of the vehicles need to provide equipment that works at the present standards.

Until then, we will need to enhance the fuel quality to ensure our trucks stay running...and I would run additive in any of the three manufacturers trucks. To not do so is too large of a gamble...

Peace
 
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2012 | 01:43 AM
  #35  
hay is for horses's Avatar
hay is for horses
Junior User
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Crazy001
Doesn't look like it. "Enhanced water separation" likely means that it contains a demulsifier that would assist your DFCM in doing it's job. Meaning that if you had water in your fuel it should come out when you drain it, and it would also set off the WIF light.

If you have water in there, and the WIF light comes on that means that your additive is helping protect your engine. This is a GOOD thing in the event you get bad fuel!
This is copied off of power sevice site:

Diesel Fuel Supplement Benefits:

  • Prevents fuel gelling in temperatures as low as -40°F.
  • Equals performance of a 50/50 blend of No. 2 and No. 1 diesel fuels
  • Lowers Cold-Filter Plugging Point (CFPP) as much as 36°F. — keeps fuel-filters from plugging with wax
  • Boosts cetane up to 4 numbers for faster cold starts
  • Contains Slickdiesel® Lubricator for maximum fuel lubrication — protects pumps and injectors from accelerated wear
  • Contains anti-icing additives — protects against fuel-filter icing
  • Contains wax anti-settling dispersants — protects against fuel-filter plugging at temperatures below the fuel cloud point
  • Disperses water in diesel fuel
  • Effective in all diesel fuels, including Ultra Low Sulfur Diesel (ULSD) and biodiesel blends containing up to 20% biodiesel
Would that not be the oppisite we would want for the DFCM to e able to remove water?
Not looking for a fight about which additive is good or bad just trying to understand what I can do to help protect my investment the best that I can
 
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2012 | 08:04 AM
  #36  
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 25,478
Likes: 738
From: Isanti, MN
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by hay is for horses
This is copied off of power sevice site:

Diesel Fuel Supplement Benefits:

  • Prevents fuel gelling in temperatures as low as -40°F.
  • Equals performance of a 50/50 blend of No. 2 and No. 1 diesel fuels
  • Lowers Cold-Filter Plugging Point (CFPP) as much as 36°F. — keeps fuel-filters from plugging with wax
  • Boosts cetane up to 4 numbers for faster cold starts
  • Contains Slickdiesel® Lubricator for maximum fuel lubrication — protects pumps and injectors from accelerated wear
  • Contains anti-icing additives — protects against fuel-filter icing
  • Contains wax anti-settling dispersants — protects against fuel-filter plugging at temperatures below the fuel cloud point
  • Disperses water in diesel fuel
  • Effective in all diesel fuels, including Ultra Low Sulfur Diesel (ULSD) and biodiesel blends containing up to 20% biodiesel
Would that not be the oppisite we would want for the DFCM to e able to remove water?
Not looking for a fight about which additive is good or bad just trying to understand what I can do to help protect my investment the best that I can
Yup, I read that. I then contacted Power Service looking for clarification, and this is what I got back:

Mr. Bowen:

It was a pleasure speaking with you earlier today. I will briefly summarize what we discussed.

Diesel Kleen and Diesel Fuel Supplement are demulsifier/solubilizers. This means that they will not allow the fuel to carry any more water than it naturally would, and they will demulsify excess water. Neither of these products will emulsify free water droplets into the fuel. Diesel fuel typically carries 50-100 ppm water naturally. Biodiesel can carry 10x the amount of water as regular diesel fuel.

With the Spicer test, as we discussed, Power Service chose not to participate in this paid study for several reasons, one of which being that they would not allow us to supply our own additive. As a result, there is question as to whether or not they used our older formulations or the ones containing Slickdiesel lubricator. Furthermore, we have been testing the lubricity of fuels for years, and on the national average we see a 200 micron WSD improvement using Diesel Kleen or Diesel Fuel Supplement at a single treatment ratio. The fuel used in the Spicer test is also not close to indicative of what would be found at a retail pump, as it was a intentionally made to be an off-specification product. Remember that every fuel has slightly different characteristics, and responds differently to additives.

Please do not hesitate to ask if you have additional questions.

Best regards,
 
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2012 | 08:48 AM
  #37  
'08FX4's Avatar
'08FX4
Senior User
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
I had the same thought about the fuel used in that test. It was basically raw diesel, not what you'd find at the pump. Although it was a good test to see what each additive was able to do with it, it wasn't really indicative of the results any of us would get by adding it to the fuel we purchase at various locations.

I know in the infamous HPFP thread, there is doubt that US diesel has enough lubricity to support long term life of Bosch's components, but there has to be a baseline requirement of lubricity in fuels, as was stated in the original study. Whether its good enough or not for long life of fuel systems, it's the requirement that's being met, oil companies aren't going to bump it up just to be nice- so its up to us as owners and individuals to make the choice. My personal feeling is we have more to worry about the chance of getting a tankful of fuel with a high water content(contaminated with water and the treated with an emulsifier by the distributor, or station owner), than we need to fear about lubricity of fuel from the pump.

Regular use of any additive which, increases lubricity, boosts Cetane, and most importantly Demulsifies Water, is very cheap insurance against the possibility of getting a bad tankful of fuel somewhere, especially for those who travel and tow thousands of miles cross country from time to time. Think of the additive as a liquid condom for your Fuel System. Ya can't just let any pump stick it's nozzle in her tank, without using appropriate protection.
 
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2012 | 10:09 AM
  #38  
rickatic's Avatar
rickatic
Postmaster
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,839
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by '08FX4
I had the same thought about the fuel used in that test. It was basically raw diesel, not what you'd find at the pump. Although it was a good test to see what each additive was able to do with it, it wasn't really indicative of the results any of us would get by adding it to the fuel we purchase at various locations.

I know in the infamous HPFP thread, there is doubt that US diesel has enough lubricity to support long term life of Bosch's components, but there has to be a baseline requirement of lubricity in fuels, as was stated in the original study. Whether its good enough or not for long life of fuel systems, it's the requirement that's being met, oil companies aren't going to bump it up just to be nice- so its up to us as owners and individuals to make the choice. My personal feeling is we have more to worry about the chance of getting a tankful of fuel with a high water content(contaminated with water and the treated with an emulsifier by the distributor, or station owner), than we need to fear about lubricity of fuel from the pump.

Regular use of any additive which, increases lubricity, boosts Cetane, and most importantly Demulsifies Water, is very cheap insurance against the possibility of getting a bad tankful of fuel somewhere, especially for those who travel and tow thousands of miles cross country from time to time. Think of the additive as a liquid condom for your Fuel System. Ya can't just let any pump stick it's nozzle in her tank, without using appropriate protection.
...not if you listen to the diesel engineers from just about any manufacturer. They all will tell you the fuel quality in the USA is too poor in lubricity. I have heard rumors that Caterpillar is seeing issues...

Peace
 
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2012 | 08:38 PM
  #39  
onwardthruthefog's Avatar
onwardthruthefog
Freshman User
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
The MSDS should remain the same at any amount. So whats up with that?
 
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2012 | 07:53 PM
  #40  
gsxr1300's Avatar
gsxr1300
Posting Guru
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 972
Likes: 0
what ratio is everyone using opti-lube xpd?
 
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2012 | 04:58 AM
  #41  
RM2012F350's Avatar
RM2012F350
Senior User
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
From: Pleasants Co. WV
10 oz to my tank...

Every fill up. I've got a long wheel base and seem to have a 37 +/- gallon tank...
 
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2012 | 05:48 AM
  #42  
gsxr1300's Avatar
gsxr1300
Posting Guru
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 972
Likes: 0
.25 or. 5 oz per gallon?
 
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2012 | 10:34 AM
  #43  
kereams's Avatar
kereams
Mountain Pass
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
I use .5 or so. Probably overkill but oh well.
 
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2012 | 01:35 PM
  #44  
cford716's Avatar
cford716
Elder User
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 754
Likes: 0
I use .25 year round even in winter. I think if i recall the .5 is recommended for winter.
 
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2012 | 03:03 PM
  #45  
gsxr1300's Avatar
gsxr1300
Posting Guru
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 972
Likes: 0
The tets where Xpd came in second they used the. 5 dose
So i guess you dont get the lubricity with the smaller dose
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:33 AM.