1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel  
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: DP Tuner

IS ANYBODY USING CYCLONE/TORNADO GAS SAVER ON 7.3L

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 08-04-2011, 09:36 AM
A H DEVELOPMENT's Avatar
A H DEVELOPMENT
A H DEVELOPMENT is offline
Elder User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 592
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question IS ANYBODY USING CYCLONE/TORNADO GAS SAVER ON 7.3L

I was driving on the interstate yesterday when my cold side turdo tube blew out of its boot. To my surprise I found a CYCLONE gas saver installed. Should I remove it? My 2001 F350 7.3L DSL has operated fine for 100,000+ miles.

Thanks in advance FTE guys!!!!

TORNADO Air Management Systems :: More Power! More Mileage!

This is what was installed on my truck, by previous owner.


[IMG]file:///C:/My%20Documents/CYCLONE%20INTAKE.jpg[/IMG]
 
  #2  
Old 08-04-2011, 09:42 AM
powerstroke72's Avatar
powerstroke72
powerstroke72 is offline
Super Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: SW Virginia
Posts: 24,308
Received 36 Likes on 21 Posts
Moved to the 1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel forum.
 
  #3  
Old 08-04-2011, 09:54 AM
nlemerise's Avatar
nlemerise
nlemerise is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: AZ
Posts: 4,243
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Read this...about half way down page one... In a word, yes, I would remove it.
 
  #4  
Old 08-04-2011, 12:47 PM
twags6's Avatar
twags6
twags6 is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Slatington, PA
Posts: 2,726
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Toss it. It does nothing but restrict the flow of air through the boot.
 
  #5  
Old 08-04-2011, 06:58 PM
F350-6's Avatar
F350-6
F350-6 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 26,966
Likes: 0
Received 27 Likes on 23 Posts
Didn't Gene have one of those things and think it helped?
 
  #6  
Old 08-04-2011, 09:58 PM
clux's Avatar
clux
clux is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Carhenge
Posts: 10,600
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Gene had a turbo air guide and swore by it.
Turbo Air Guide - Ford Powerstroke Diesel Pickup Truck - More Air Flow, More Power, Increased Fuel Mileage, Greater Performance --www.blackclouddiesel.com

I might have argued with him about a time or two...............
 
  #7  
Old 08-04-2011, 10:38 PM
SpringerPop's Avatar
SpringerPop
SpringerPop is offline
Hotshot

Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: La La Land
Posts: 17,986
Received 188 Likes on 112 Posts
I would think that if that honeycomb material comes apart for any reason, your turbine blades have BIG problems!

I can't imagine that there is enough reduction to flow turbulence to allow a performance increase enough to overcome the loss produced by the cross-sectional resistance to flow.

Sorry. Got no graphs, charts, bells, whistles, or anything else to prove my thoughts.

Pop
 
  #8  
Old 08-05-2011, 01:57 AM
Pitcrw6's Avatar
Pitcrw6
Pitcrw6 is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Panama City, FL
Posts: 4,410
Received 16 Likes on 10 Posts
I had one in both my X and F350 for a few yrs right when I bought them and didnt notice any difference so I removed them.
 
  #9  
Old 08-05-2011, 02:36 AM
CSIPSD's Avatar
CSIPSD
CSIPSD is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bend, OR
Posts: 4,993
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
That big spinny thing that makes all that noise will "spin" the air all you need.
 
  #10  
Old 08-05-2011, 04:43 AM
hotroddsl's Avatar
hotroddsl
hotroddsl is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Gilbert Az.
Posts: 2,364
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
If those things worked as they said they do they would be OEM on every turbo-diesel made, as efficiency is king in this industry, as it ultimately results in lower emissions and higher power!
Jim...& fat Monty
 
  #11  
Old 08-05-2011, 08:33 AM
DieselCamper01's Avatar
DieselCamper01
DieselCamper01 is offline
Fleet Owner
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: BLT, MN
Posts: 27,614
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by hotroddsl
If those things worked as they said they do they would be OEM on every turbo-diesel made, as efficiency is king in this industry, as it ultimately results in lower emissions and higher power!
Jim...& fat Monty
Well said my friend...
 
  #12  
Old 08-05-2011, 08:40 AM
nlemerise's Avatar
nlemerise
nlemerise is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: AZ
Posts: 4,243
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by clux
I might have argued with him about a time or two...............
many times...
 
  #13  
Old 08-05-2011, 10:40 AM
farmb0y's Avatar
farmb0y
farmb0y is offline
Posting Guru

Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: IOWA
Posts: 2,365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would agree with others here that it's a waste of money, but a fews years back I must have had money to waste. For some reason I bought an Air Cell intake spacer for my Kenworth, as seen here:
Fuel Saving Aircell Intake Spacers - IOWA80.COM

It had a money back guarantee, figured I'd try it and could return it when I saw no improvement. I honestly think it helped my truck pull a little harder, and I saw my mileage go up by .2 mpg. Yea it's not alot, but when you put a lot of miles under the tires it can start making a difference. I don't know how or why it made a difference or I felt a difference, but I left it in there. I did like that it didn't really "block" the intake, like that Cyclone does.

Then a year later I sold the truck and bought a new one with a bigger motor and now am getting better mpg than before with a lot easier pulling!!
 
  #14  
Old 08-05-2011, 05:29 PM
Mark Kovalsky's Avatar
Mark Kovalsky
Mark Kovalsky is offline
Fleet Owner

Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: SE Florida
Posts: 23,279
Received 1,580 Likes on 1,058 Posts
It did make a difference. You expected better fuel economy so you drove a little better to help it, whether you knew you were doing it or not. If you ran a scientific test like the link above you would have found that at best it didn't hurt you a lot. It certainly wasn't responsible for 0.2 MPG gains. Bad science doesn't work.
 
  #15  
Old 08-05-2011, 05:55 PM
farmb0y's Avatar
farmb0y
farmb0y is offline
Posting Guru

Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: IOWA
Posts: 2,365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mark Kovalsky
It did make a difference. You expected better fuel economy so you drove a little better to help it, whether you knew you were doing it or not. If you ran a scientific test like the link above you would have found that at best it didn't hurt you a lot. It certainly wasn't responsible for 0.2 MPG gains. Bad science doesn't work.

When I fuel up every 2 days putting in close to 200 gallons each time and I consistantly have slightly better mileage than before, something made a difference. I drove it exactly the same as I always did, with the pedal to the floor cuz the trailer I was pulling would dog the crap out of my truck.

Scientific tests are great, but they are in a controlled environment. What about real world experience? If what I see in my "real world test" doesn't line up with what someone found in a "scientific test" in a lab, my results are automatically ruled out? Why?

I wouldn't buy it again, and I'm not saying for the OP to keep it in there. I'm just sharing my experiences.
 


Quick Reply: IS ANYBODY USING CYCLONE/TORNADO GAS SAVER ON 7.3L



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:36 PM.