Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks

93 F150 Running WAY TOO rich

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 4, 2011 | 11:32 PM
  #1  
BigJared's Avatar
BigJared
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: Angleton
93 F150 Running WAY TOO rich

Working on a 93 F150 2wd. Had bad motor. We replaced it with a 5.0 from a 94 Mustang Gt. engine has an E303 cam, full length headers, 2.5 inch pipe off of headers into custom y pipe into single 3 inch in and out flowmaster, no cats, new O2 sensor. starts easy. idles fair. sounds EXCELENT. it fouls plugs in less than 5 gallons of fuel during testing and idleing in the driveway. you can see it and you can smell it in the exhaust. it is bad.

anyone let me know. I understand this is a bit much cam for speed density, but I would think it would be too lean, not too rich.

Peace.
 
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2011 | 07:35 AM
  #2  
BigJared's Avatar
BigJared
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: Angleton
please help anyone....

peace
 
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2011 | 08:02 AM
  #3  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,927
Likes: 1,494
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Are there any codes and is the fuel pressure within spec? That cam is not at all compatable with the EFI system in that truck so it will have to go if you want decent drivability from this.
 
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2011 | 10:23 PM
  #4  
BigJared's Avatar
BigJared
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: Angleton
Thanks.

No codes.

Haven't checked the fuel pressure yet.

I understand there will be a slight driveability issue, but I have seen the combo work in S/D Mustangs. I should be able to check the fuel presure tomorrow.

Do you know if the 93's were "batch fire" or "sequential port" on the fuel injectors? we had this combo in an 86 F150 with stock "batch fire" ecm and it ran fine with the stock cam versus the E-cam. I had rewired the injector harness to "batch fire" properly with the HO-302 firing order versus the standard truck firing order. I have not rewired the 93 injector harness.


Thanks again.
 
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2011 | 10:03 PM
  #5  
mr.fordneck's Avatar
mr.fordneck
Senior User
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 439
Likes: 1
my 90' was running too ruch. A new wiring harness fixed it
 
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2011 | 06:53 AM
  #6  
CS45's Avatar
CS45
Junior User
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
From: SWFL
When my F250 5.8 was running rich it was caused by exhaust leaks before the O2 sensor. Fixed that with a complete new exhaust and no leaks, not running rich, no CEL.

CS45
 
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2011 | 07:05 PM
  #7  
rla2005's Avatar
rla2005
Fleet Owner
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Community Favorite
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 20,761
Likes: 1,734
From: Kentucky
Have you checked the fuel pressure regulator for signs of leaking? Pull the vacuum line off of it, visually inspect and smell it for signs of fuel. Very common problem to have a leaky FPR diaphragm.

The '93 trucks were all batch fire BTW.
 
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2011 | 07:27 PM
  #8  
BigJared's Avatar
BigJared
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: Angleton
Thanks everyone. I hope to be able to try and check all of that tomorrow.
 
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2011 | 11:07 PM
  #9  
BigJared's Avatar
BigJared
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: Angleton
Well I finally got time to work on it. I rewired the injector harness on the engine.
because of the differences of the old firing order versus the new H.O. firing order. The injectors fire in batches that follow the firing order. Because of this there was puddling of fuel or something causing the single fuel injector to see a lean condition and telling the computer to send more fuel.

Now all I have left is the "surging" at idle.

Thanks to you all.
 
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2013 | 07:26 PM
  #10  
makingaZJ's Avatar
makingaZJ
Freshman User
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by BigJared
Well I finally got time to work on it. I rewired the injector harness on the engine.
because of the differences of the old firing order versus the new H.O. firing order. The injectors fire in batches that follow the firing order. Because of this there was puddling of fuel or something causing the single fuel injector to see a lean condition and telling the computer to send more fuel.

Now all I have left is the "surging" at idle.

Thanks to you all.
Hey man i have a 89 with a mustang 5.0 ho around the same specs, and you can watch the gas needle fall while it sits in the driveway!! x2 smell it ect..

what exactly did you rewire? how? im still running everything stock for the truck as of now, besides the firing order of course..

thanks

-Nate
 
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2013 | 09:24 PM
  #11  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,927
Likes: 1,494
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Originally Posted by BigJared
I rewired the injector harness on the engine.
Exactly what wiring changes did you make? The batch system fires 4 injectors at a time so I don't see how it would make any difference.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hambone460
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
15
Mar 25, 2022 03:27 AM
Rich G
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
13
Apr 27, 2017 05:42 AM
ShaneNP123
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
15
Mar 21, 2016 02:11 PM
jimbo beam
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
11
Oct 22, 2011 06:59 PM
earlybroncoboy
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
4
May 6, 2007 09:24 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:02 PM.