Eliminate e40d rear axle speed sensor
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
From: Gallitzin, Pa.
Eliminate e40d rear axle speed sensor
Can i eliminate the rear shift sensor in my axle to run the trans as a shiftable automatic? i have trouble getting into the high end when racing and i think its because all the spinning. granted it is in 4lo so i wont get alot of speed but anything would help and it seems like it has more to give but is revving out. the axles are 3.55 and not sure if they're ls because truthfully haven't looked yet. thanks
BTW forget to mention 1992 F150 Flare side with 302
BTW forget to mention 1992 F150 Flare side with 302
FTE Legend
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
The rear axle VSS sensor is manditory for proper transmission operation so no it cannot be eliminated. The reason the motor doesn't have any top end power is because it's not designed for it.. peak HP happens at 3800rpm so reving it more is just making noise. If you want more top end HP swap in a Mustang HO cam.
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
From: Gallitzin, Pa.
I'm hoping to do that soon because i definitely want more power out of it, but the budget is tight.(isn't it always?) there are just times it feels like it has another gear to give but i cant get it there, i thought maybe just eliminating that and shifting myself would work out better. the mud is to thick to run in 4hi. so far the motor mods are eliminated the ac, smog, and switched to dual electric fans. the truck is raced off road.
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
From: Gallitzin, Pa.
@usmc0351
hey man weird running into you here. lol just went past your place last night and was eyeballing the bronco.haha Still thinkin bout it.
hey man weird running into you here. lol just went past your place last night and was eyeballing the bronco.haha Still thinkin bout it.
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
From: Gallitzin, Pa.
think your right about the cam, its on the list as soon as i get some more money from my sponsors. do think a set of 4v heads would help out too? i tried to research the 92 motor some but not alot of luck or im not looking hard enough
FTE Stories
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer
Joe Kucinski
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)
Brett Foote
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies
Joe Kucinski
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make
Brett Foote
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!
Michael S. Palmer
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home
Verdad Gallardo
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!
Joe Kucinski
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?
Brett Foote
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!
Michael S. Palmer
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
From: Gallitzin, Pa.
talked to some guys about the "lincoln locker" and they said it pushs to hard in the turns. the 3.55 seems pretty good so far i just want more speed on the straights. i think the 4.10 would get me off the line quicker for sure, but i would hit the same issue on the top end.
. they had 4v on the 84?(around there) mustang gt 302.
Senior User
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
i just learning yet but i think the 4.10s would keep u up in ur peek RPMs so u'd be gettin ur peak power and have the gears to move u through that thick mud as well... when my brother swapped 4.10 into his ranger for muddin it made a huge difference in the mud
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fatheroftwo
1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
4
Mar 10, 2016 11:56 AM
junkyardjeff
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
4
May 30, 2015 08:24 PM
Duct Tape Racing
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
4
Oct 12, 2010 12:46 PM
