Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

351w cam selection

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 10-08-2016, 09:59 AM
crash113's Avatar
crash113
crash113 is offline
Freshman User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Chaplin
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
351w cam selection

In the process of building a new motor for my 1997 F250HD and trying to decide on a cam. A lot of people recommend the crane 444232 which I noticed is a hydraulic flat tappet cam but I'm using a 96 roller motor as a base. Would it make sense to go backwards and install the crane or should I stick with the stock cam and run 1.7 roller rockers? Feel free to let me know any other suggestions.
 
  #2  
Old 10-08-2016, 01:05 PM
rla2005's Avatar
rla2005
rla2005 is online now
Hotshot
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 19,588
Received 1,165 Likes on 920 Posts
Originally Posted by crash113
In the process of building a new motor for my 1997 F250HD and trying to decide on a cam. A lot of people recommend the crane 444232 which I noticed is a hydraulic flat tappet cam but I'm using a 96 roller motor as a base. Would it make sense to go backwards and install the crane or should I stick with the stock cam and run 1.7 roller rockers? Feel free to let me know any other suggestions.
Stick with the stock cam and run 1.7 roller rockers <-This
 
  #3  
Old 10-08-2016, 05:06 PM
Plowboy34's Avatar
Plowboy34
Plowboy34 is offline
Tuned
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SE Missouri
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I'm building the same engine right now and I'm using the stock roller with 1.7 roller rockers. If you want low end torque for towing it is the way to go.
 
  #4  
Old 10-09-2016, 12:42 AM
crash113's Avatar
crash113
crash113 is offline
Freshman User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Chaplin
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Perfect that's what I'm going for. What brand roller rockers are you running?
 
  #5  
Old 10-09-2016, 03:31 AM
GoinBoarding's Avatar
GoinBoarding
GoinBoarding is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Laramie, WY
Posts: 3,103
Received 161 Likes on 129 Posts
Crane Energizer seems to be the way to go. 5/16" pedestal mount. They seem to be backordered though. Ford Racing sells the same thing, for $80 more. Parts houses have those stocked but not the kit direct from Crane.

I too am doing a 5.8L build right now with stock roller cam and 1.7 RR. Lots of reading lead me to believe it's a great bang for your buck with no one being flat out unhappy. I added in a bottom end rebuild, fresh GT40P heads, long tube headers, and a Frankenstein intake. Goal is torque for me too. Getting excited to drive it!
 
  #6  
Old 10-09-2016, 05:13 AM
'89F2urd's Avatar
'89F2urd
'89F2urd is online now
Lead Driver
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 5,050
Received 124 Likes on 105 Posts
Crane 444211 or comp xe258.
 
  #7  
Old 10-09-2016, 10:03 AM
crash113's Avatar
crash113
crash113 is offline
Freshman User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Chaplin
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GoinBoarding what do you mean by Frankenstein intake? And '89f2urd I checked out both cams and they have an LSA of 112 degrees. I'm running the stock speed density and I was under the impression that I couldn't go below 114 degrees.
 
  #8  
Old 10-09-2016, 10:06 AM
'89F2urd's Avatar
'89F2urd
'89F2urd is online now
Lead Driver
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 5,050
Received 124 Likes on 105 Posts
Both of those 112 lsa cams work with speed density, 114 lsa is a general rule of thumb, but not law...far more important than lsa is when the intake valve closes. Both of those cams intake closing events are early, generating lots of vacuum and lots of torque off idle.

They work fine.
 
  #9  
Old 10-09-2016, 11:13 AM
GoinBoarding's Avatar
GoinBoarding
GoinBoarding is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Laramie, WY
Posts: 3,103
Received 161 Likes on 129 Posts
Originally Posted by crash113
GoinBoarding what do you mean by Frankenstein intake? And '89f2urd I checked out both cams and they have an LSA of 112 degrees. I'm running the stock speed density and I was under the impression that I couldn't go below 114 degrees.
Porting a 5.8L truck lower intake to match a 5.0L truck upper intake. Discussed here: https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/1...-manifold.html

It's a cheap way to gain some flow. How much? I don't know, but I didn't have the funds for an aftermarket intake.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
6978sghfbjklgdfsjhkl
Ford Inline Six, 200, 250, 4.9L / 300
15
01-25-2014 06:58 PM
Shwan_89HD
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
3
10-04-2013 05:29 PM
fomoconate
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
2
05-19-2009 09:44 PM
scott9320
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
3
03-25-2003 10:25 PM
thenkel2
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
2
03-27-2001 03:36 PM



Quick Reply: 351w cam selection



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:24 PM.