Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

How to stroke a 351W

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 12-08-2014, 06:09 PM
t-bone31's Avatar
t-bone31
t-bone31 is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How to stroke a 351W

Hey everyone. My truck has alot of miles on it so I have decided that in the near future im going to pull the motor and rebuild it. I have read that it is worth stroking the 351 so I would like to do so but can not get the right direction on google haha. I have a 1996 F150 ext. Cab with the 5.8. Any and all advice is a great help to me. Btw. This truck will be used as a regular truck. Pulling trailers, hauling things etc. Im not looking for a race truck just want some good ol' truck power.
 
  #2  
Old 12-08-2014, 07:19 PM
'89F2urd's Avatar
'89F2urd
'89F2urd is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 5,048
Received 124 Likes on 105 Posts
Originally Posted by t-bone31
Hey everyone. My truck has alot of miles on it so I have decided that in the near future im going to pull the motor and rebuild it. I have read that it is worth stroking the 351 so I would like to do so but can not get the right direction on google haha. I have a 1996 F150 ext. Cab with the 5.8. Any and all advice is a great help to me. Btw. This truck will be used as a regular truck. Pulling trailers, hauling things etc. Im not looking for a race truck just want some good ol' truck power.
402 or 408 is best bang for the buck, because its a good compromise between cubic inches and cost . Damn near pointless to build a stroker with stock heads, so misewell budget for a good set.

Plenty of info on google or search function in this forum.
 
  #3  
Old 12-08-2014, 07:25 PM
f100beatertruck's Avatar
f100beatertruck
f100beatertruck is offline
Cargo Master

Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Parkesburg PA
Posts: 2,408
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I did a 393" kit because it uses stock 302 pistons, but in the end I don't think there's much cost difference.

I'd say GT40 heads from a pre-97 explorer / mountaineer would be the minimum, however, unless you can get a good deal on cores it might be cheaper to get aftermarket heads. Maybe you can talk the machine shop into exchanging the GT40 heads for your E7's
 
  #4  
Old 12-08-2014, 07:26 PM
t-bone31's Avatar
t-bone31
t-bone31 is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was thinking 393. But I dont know if that is best or not. I def wouldnt use stock heads. I am trying to get some torque and horse power but keep compression low for mpg purposes.
 
  #5  
Old 12-08-2014, 07:34 PM
t-bone31's Avatar
t-bone31
t-bone31 is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Did you use gt40 heads on your 393? And how did you overall like the 393? Im also not sure what cam to use along with it. Im def thinking on doing the 393 though. Seems more practical for me
 
  #6  
Old 12-08-2014, 08:18 PM
Zach Hill's Avatar
Zach Hill
Zach Hill is offline
New User
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Someone correct me if I'm wrong but I don't think you would lose MPG with higher compression. Just more power
 
  #7  
Old 12-08-2014, 08:20 PM
'89F2urd's Avatar
'89F2urd
'89F2urd is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 5,048
Received 124 Likes on 105 Posts
Originally Posted by t-bone31
I was thinking 393. But I dont know if that is best or not. I def wouldnt use stock heads. I am trying to get some torque and horse power but keep compression low for mpg purposes.
Keep compression low for mpg purposes? Who told you that?
 
  #8  
Old 12-08-2014, 09:18 PM
t-bone31's Avatar
t-bone31
t-bone31 is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry. Alittle mix up on my part. I mean stay lower on compression for the type gas I will use. I still want to use regular gas.
 
  #9  
Old 12-08-2014, 09:20 PM
Zach Hill's Avatar
Zach Hill
Zach Hill is offline
New User
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh you can go up to at least 10:1 on pump gas. I'm not sure what 351's are stock, but I know my 460 is barely over 8:1.
 
  #10  
Old 12-08-2014, 09:23 PM
t-bone31's Avatar
t-bone31
t-bone31 is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thats a good thing. Thank yall. Just trying to get an idea of where to go with a 393. I have never done it before so trying to figure out what heads and cam and all that stuff is where I get confused.
 
  #11  
Old 12-08-2014, 09:25 PM
Zach Hill's Avatar
Zach Hill
Zach Hill is offline
New User
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't know what you would want for heads. But to pick a cam, check out Cam Quest, its awesome, it gives you estimated power numbers too, not sure how accurate they are.
 
  #12  
Old 12-08-2014, 09:38 PM
Nothing Special's Avatar
Nothing Special
Nothing Special is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Roseville, MN
Posts: 4,964
Likes: 0
Received 50 Likes on 45 Posts
Originally Posted by Zach Hill
Oh you can go up to at least 10:1 on pump gas. I'm not sure what 351's are stock, but I know my 460 is barely over 8:1.
I'm not an expert on this, but I'd be really surprised if you can run 10:1 compression on regular 87 octane, at least not without retarding the timing an awful lot. You ought to be OK on premium, if the concern is being able to buy gas at a normal station rather than in 55 gallon drums from a distributor. but don't expect to be able to use the cheap stuff.
 
  #13  
Old 12-08-2014, 10:12 PM
Zach Hill's Avatar
Zach Hill
Zach Hill is offline
New User
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Nothing Special
I'm not an expert on this, but I'd be really surprised if you can run 10:1 compression on regular 87 octane, at least not without retarding the timing an awful lot. You ought to be OK on premium, if the concern is being able to buy gas at a normal station rather than in 55 gallon drums from a distributor. but don't expect to be able to use the cheap stuff.
You're correct, I believe you can run 9 on 89 and 10 on 91. However if you wanna go with E85 or water-meth injection you can go to at least 13.
 
  #14  
Old 12-08-2014, 10:34 PM
'89F2urd's Avatar
'89F2urd
'89F2urd is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 5,048
Received 124 Likes on 105 Posts
stock engines are barely over 8:1. makes for a very soft and abysmal throttle pedal. i'll take higher compression all day long, especially in a truck engine that will be used for work, and torque is a must. when setup properly, and accounting for the added cost per gallon, it'll at least break even with an 87 counterpart with the addition of great pedal feel and better overall driving experience.


the only problem with using the 393 is the pistons themselves. the short skirt can promote premature cylinder/skirt wear. I cant attest to it personally, because ive never run a short piston stroker for long periods of time, but its not a coincidence that engines utilizing long strokes across the board also use taller pistons respectively.


I'd get a kit that comes with pistons, with some high flow small"er" port heads, and run 10.5-11:1 compression, and of course an SD friendly cam with 1.7 rockers. intake work and long tubes are a given, I assume. you will not be displeased.
 
  #15  
Old 12-08-2014, 11:11 PM
1993_f350_2013's Avatar
1993_f350_2013
1993_f350_2013 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: New Sharon, IA
Posts: 1,224
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by '89F2urd
stock engines are barely over 8:1. makes for a very soft and abysmal throttle pedal. i'll take higher compression all day long, especially in a truck engine that will be used for work, and torque is a must. when setup properly, and accounting for the added cost per gallon, it'll at least break even with an 87 counterpart with the addition of great pedal feel and better overall driving experience.


the only problem with using the 393 is the pistons themselves. the short skirt can promote premature cylinder/skirt wear. I cant attest to it personally, because ive never run a short piston stroker for long periods of time, but its not a coincidence that engines utilizing long strokes across the board also use taller pistons respectively.


I'd get a kit that comes with pistons, with some high flow small"er" port heads, and run 10.5-11:1 compression, and of course an SD friendly cam with 1.7 rockers. intake work and long tubes are a given, I assume. you will not be displeased.
Since his truck is a 96 it will have mass air. So his mods are also endless
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
4x484150
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
4
02-07-2013 11:52 AM
fireman660r
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
19
02-13-2009 02:16 PM
Redneck1465
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
8
01-19-2009 01:03 PM
matt16875
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
99
12-19-2006 06:55 PM
AKBronc
Performance & General Engine Building
3
10-09-2004 11:42 AM



Quick Reply: How to stroke a 351W



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:23 AM.