1994.5 - 1997 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel  

Which rods

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #31  
Old 01-03-2014, 10:59 AM
strokin'_tatsch's Avatar
strokin'_tatsch
strokin'_tatsch is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 10,007
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
I can't tell what that says. lol
 
  #32  
Old 01-03-2014, 10:14 PM
fordpride's Avatar
fordpride
fordpride is offline
Post Fiend
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Livoina,La
Posts: 15,505
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts
142617




This 10 crap
 
  #33  
Old 01-04-2014, 11:08 PM
fordman67's Avatar
fordman67
fordman67 is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: evansville in
Posts: 14,077
Received 398 Likes on 269 Posts
Originally Posted by strokin'_tatsch
An '01 engine should have the support in the lifter area, thicker valley walls, a crank that does NOT have lightening holes drilled through the rod journals, and the block should be clearanced for the larger counterweights on the crankshaft that were a result of eliminating the lightening holes in the rod journals. Also, the pistons in an '01 should have the intermediate ring grooves cut deeper (pre Jan '98 were 0.402" and post Jan '98 were 0.435") and use a wider intermediate ring (pre Jan '98 intermediate ring was 0.137" and post Jan '98 intermediate ring was 0.185")..
That was what i thought but ...? if they sold as an 01 they need to give him a diff engine ...
 
  #34  
Old 01-05-2014, 12:13 AM
fordman67's Avatar
fordman67
fordman67 is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: evansville in
Posts: 14,077
Received 398 Likes on 269 Posts
My y2k is 92310793
The thicker casting was supposed to keep noise down lol yyeeeaaa Ok!
 
  #35  
Old 01-05-2014, 01:32 AM
strokin'_tatsch's Avatar
strokin'_tatsch
strokin'_tatsch is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 10,007
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
FYI, OBS engines aren't really having any problems holding power. The thicker material in the valley area is not going to make or break this build. It will hold just fine unless the tuning gets retarded.. lol
 
  #36  
Old 01-05-2014, 08:23 AM
oldbird1965's Avatar
oldbird1965
oldbird1965 is offline
Fleet Owner

Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 20,283
Received 126 Likes on 104 Posts
Originally Posted by fordman67
My y2k is 92310793
The thicker casting was supposed to keep noise down lol yyeeeaaa Ok!
Did I hear 'keep noise down'. I want one!
 
  #37  
Old 01-05-2014, 08:39 AM
fordman67's Avatar
fordman67
fordman67 is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: evansville in
Posts: 14,077
Received 398 Likes on 269 Posts
Originally Posted by strokin'_tatsch
FYI, OBS engines aren't really having any problems holding power. The thicker material in the valley area is not going to make or break this build. It will hold just fine unless the tuning gets retarded.. lol
retarded? i resemble that phrase lol
i am not questioning it just in my head if there is something better i am interested.
my prob is in the past i had 5.0 mustangs. As you know the stock block is the weak link around 500hp and they split from the valley to the mains. therefore if a better block is available..not that i will ever test its limits!
Glenn..I'm not thinking with single shots that the block noise reduction would be enough to be worth it. But there is a lot of metal there!
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
eric777
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
6
02-08-2007 08:34 PM
ponch37300
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
11
01-01-2007 06:48 PM
dm12578
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
5
02-04-2004 07:29 AM
black angel
335 Series- 5.8/351M, 6.6/400, 351 Cleveland
16
07-14-2002 06:06 PM
bigblue
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
2
04-24-2002 05:05 PM



Quick Reply: Which rods



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:41 PM.