Aftermarket Rim Size 17 and 18 inch
#1
Aftermarket Rim Size 17 and 18 inch
Who out there is running 17 or 18 inch rims/performance tires on a F1
Do they work, how does it look any pic's?
My 1952 truck is getting a frame off, new 302, Auto with overdrive, keep stock suspension.
Just wonder how I could update the tires and wheels and what might fit and look good.
I was thinking 17's up front and 18's in rear. Need ideas for a updated look, maybe 20's in rear???
Do they work, how does it look any pic's?
My 1952 truck is getting a frame off, new 302, Auto with overdrive, keep stock suspension.
Just wonder how I could update the tires and wheels and what might fit and look good.
I was thinking 17's up front and 18's in rear. Need ideas for a updated look, maybe 20's in rear???
#2
Not to be the devil's advocate, but if you keep the stock suspension (and brakes I assume), increasing your tire size and diameter will even further decrease the ability for your brakes to work. In addition to that, the 302 will put even more work load on the brakes. Add the big rims and tires, and you've got your hands full.
#3
#4
some major thoughts to consider - how tall is your garage door? how tall is the parking garage at work?
Not that these are within a 0.1", but these trucks are actually pretty tall sitting on stock setups. My F1 (1948) sitting on stock everything is 6' 7" tall on 63 yr old springs... my garage door is "7 foot", but the arm which guides the door up and down is 6' 9"... so now we start talking nervous clearances.
The stock 6.00x16 is 28.4" and the optional 6.50x16 is 28.9" - I think these trucks look best with a ~ 28-29" tire on em myself - check out all the math and brain damage https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/1...l#post11274658 and then the pix https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/1...l#post11373589
Another thought Ross figured out for us - stock brake line up front can possibly be short enough that a drastic tire change combined with longer throw shock (modern "replacement" gabriels have a longer throw) and you could pull the lines apart when you hit a bump... start playing with one variable and the whole equation unravels.
Not that these are within a 0.1", but these trucks are actually pretty tall sitting on stock setups. My F1 (1948) sitting on stock everything is 6' 7" tall on 63 yr old springs... my garage door is "7 foot", but the arm which guides the door up and down is 6' 9"... so now we start talking nervous clearances.
The stock 6.00x16 is 28.4" and the optional 6.50x16 is 28.9" - I think these trucks look best with a ~ 28-29" tire on em myself - check out all the math and brain damage https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/1...l#post11274658 and then the pix https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/1...l#post11373589
Another thought Ross figured out for us - stock brake line up front can possibly be short enough that a drastic tire change combined with longer throw shock (modern "replacement" gabriels have a longer throw) and you could pull the lines apart when you hit a bump... start playing with one variable and the whole equation unravels.
#6
#7
Trending Topics
#8
He might be able to get you some good info!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rustyleerusk
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
5
08-22-2015 11:58 AM