Feedback on stroker with SD
Thanks for your insight.
As your stroked motor will be flowing more air just because of the stroking, never mind the cam, the mixture will end up lean.
I like the idea jrwwhitmire had, the use of a SD computer from a truck with a 351. Also, an aftermarket chip to help with the new parameters would help too I am sure.
So, from those who HAVE built a mild stroker and kept SD, what say ye??? Go:No Go for launch?
Trending Topics
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Here's my story:
The 95 F150 below was mine; I bought it in 98 with 81k and had it until 2002ish with 150k. When it started to burn thru some oil, I took it to a local race/mechanic shop for a basic pull and rebuild; I asked him to juice it up a bit. The guy asked me if I'd be interested in putting a stroker kit in it, and I said..."Well, you have my attention!" They took out the factory 351, clearanced the block for the increased stroke, put in a Eagle cast steel crank, resized the factory rods, Keith Black forged 9.5:1 pistons, surfaced and rebuilt the stock heads with new springs, seals, and 3 angle valve job, Crane CompuCam with new pushrods. Totally balanced and blueprinted. New water pump and high volume oil pump. Still had the factory tune, intake, throttle body, everything else was stock. Pretty basic build, really. I intended to replace the intake system and have JET burn a custom tune for me, but never got around to it. It completely changed the powerband of the engine; from 4k plus, it started to fall of, but it had MONSTER torque and response from idle right on up. It had increased the torque so much, that I nailed it from a dead stop and shattered the rear differential carrier around the bearing support- it made a loud BANG! Soooo....I took the factory Trac-Lock 3.55's, and had the same shop put in 4.10's with an Auburn Pro in back and an Auburn Heavy Duty limited slip in front. BIG improvement, and 4:10's were the perfect change using 31" tires. I was worried about the mileage difference, but in all truth, it really did not change a noticable amount at all. The truck pulled excellently, and would smoulder the tires in a doughnut that would make a Mustang jealous. I eventually had the E40D rebuilt (more preventative than anything...it wasn't dead yet), and had them put in a TransGo shift kit and heavier stall convertor. Eeeeevery now and then it would grab rubber in 2nd gear if you were into it hard. The truck ran smooth, and with true 2.5 duals and Flowmaster 50 series exhaust thru factory manifolds, would literally set off car alarms. No funky idle, no computer issues with the speed density system, nothing. It still used the factory radiator, and actually ran slightly cooler and at a more consistent temperature than before. I'm absolutely positive that an upgraded computer and intake would have really woken it up big time, but I was very impressed with what that truck did. It was a long time ago, but it felt just as ballsy or more than my black 1997 F350 with the 5spd, 3.55, 7.5L does now; heavier truck of course. If the 460 in my F350 ever gets sick, I'd have no reservation about going big with it..a 540 perhaps
??? Of course with 21,000 original miles, it's going to stay stock for a lonnnng time. The moral of the story is DO IT!!

The one exception to this rule is forced inducion, with it you could potentially double the engines output without upsetting the EFI system, but that's only if most of the engine remains stock and an FMU is used to increase fuel pressure.










