Notices

What have I learned from stroke?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 25, 2010 | 08:51 PM
  #1  
70 Bronco TX's Avatar
70 Bronco TX
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
From: Canyon, TX
What have I learned from stroke?

I finally got around to measuring the stroke on my 75 F250. The measurement was 4.25 (although may be off by a fraction--I did my best to measure same location at both #1 and #4 holes.)

The previous owner said it was a 428. It was not described as a CJ so I'm not even going there. I really didn't care one way or the other, the truck was in good shape and the engine looks quite good...performer intake, all kinds of other goodies in there. Runs like a champ, too.

The casting number on the block indicates it's a 74 or 75 truck engine (can't remember which), so it could be the original block that came with the truck (a 360) or another block (390) of about the same year.

I haven't checked bore (don't particularly care to pull a head) and I haven't checked the crank casting (don't want to pull the pan). So what have I learned? What might my engine be "called" at this point? A 428, a 410, or is there still more I need to investigate? I'm not selling, I just don't know what to say when someone asks.

I've read as many threads on related topics, but still need a bit of input. Thanks!

edit: Oh, yeah, I know it's an FE.
 

Last edited by 70 Bronco TX; Jul 25, 2010 at 08:54 PM. Reason: added info
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2010 | 09:00 PM
  #2  
Rockstone's Avatar
Rockstone
Post Fiend
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 6,751
Likes: 3
From: Sin City
My guess would be a 410, if this is the original engine. There was never a 428 in a truck, and not many 390 blocks can be bored that far. The only way you will know for sure is to measure the bore.
 
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2010 | 10:50 PM
  #3  
85e150's Avatar
85e150
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 34,495
Likes: 2,810
Club FTE Gold Member
410 or 428 have a 3.98 stroke, so unless your fraction is 1/4", you have something bigger.

Scat and I suppose others sell 4.25 stroker cranks, so it's possible you have a 445 if it started life as a 360 or 390 with a .030 overbore and does have a 4.25 stroke.

Since you're unsure, you can always say "beats me, but it runs good..." or something like that there....
 
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2010 | 10:53 PM
  #4  
70 Bronco TX's Avatar
70 Bronco TX
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
From: Canyon, TX
Thanks, Russ, I thought a 410 was a possibility based on some other readings, but you confirmed it. I'll have the bore checked at some point. Sad thing is the whole thing was disassembled about a month ago and I forgot to ask the mechanic to check it out. Oh, well.
 
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2010 | 10:57 PM
  #5  
70 Bronco TX's Avatar
70 Bronco TX
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
From: Canyon, TX
Originally Posted by 85e150six4mtod
410 or 428 have a 3.98 stroke, so unless your fraction is 1/4", you have something bigger.

Scat and I suppose others sell 4.25 stroker cranks, so it's possible you have a 445 if it started life as a 360 or 390 with a .030 overbore and does have a 4.25 stroke.

Since you're unsure, you can always say "beats me, but it runs good..." or something like that there....
85 --

Hmmmm...I suppose the crank, the actual casting, is probably key as well as the bore. The measurement was definitely more than 3.98. It was probably closer to 4.30 but I went with the low end of several marks I made so now I do wonder.

But I do like your suggestion
 
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2010 | 12:25 AM
  #6  
70 Bronco TX's Avatar
70 Bronco TX
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
From: Canyon, TX
OK, I've been doing a bit more searching....let's say it's a Scat crank (4.25 stroke) and the original 360 engine (I'm leaning toward this based on block casting number). Standard bore was 4.0.

Let's say it hasn't be bored over at all.

According to an engine displacement calculator it says the result is 427.256. Hmmmmm....sounds like a 428. Maybe not the usual way to get to 428 but sounds possible??
 

Last edited by 70 Bronco TX; Jul 26, 2010 at 12:45 AM. Reason: deleted something obviously wrong!
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2010 | 08:34 AM
  #7  
mikeo0o0o0's Avatar
mikeo0o0o0
Hotshot
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 247
From: Stanley, VA
Club FTE Gold Member
Ford never made a crank for the FE with a 4.25+" stroke. The longest stroke from the factory was the 428 with a 3.98" stroke. IF its over 3.98" it is an aftermarket crank.
Also, the std. bore for the 360/390 is 4.05" so the displacement for a 4.05" X 4.25" engine would be 438.005 cu. in.
 
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2010 | 12:37 PM
  #8  
70 Bronco TX's Avatar
70 Bronco TX
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
From: Canyon, TX
Thanks, Mike, my mistake....the first google result said something like 4.00"-4.03" bore for the 360 and I went with the round number. Or I misread a line. But everywhere else I look now matches your 4.05" number.

What a difference a fraction makes.

Dan
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-1

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-4

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-6

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
Old Jul 26, 2010 | 12:40 PM
  #9  
Moto Mel's Avatar
Moto Mel
Postmaster
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,584
Likes: 3
From: Chesapeake, Va.
You can find out the exact cid by pulling a spark plug and filling 1 cylinder that has the piston at the bottom of the stroke with a light oil, kerosene or diesel. To do this accurately you will need a burette with cc.s indicated or a measuring cup for measuring the cc.s of fork oil in a motorcycle. After finding the cc.s of 1 cylinder just multiply by 8 and then convert the cc.s to cubic inches. Then hand crank the engine to get the fluid out before you start it. This will be pretty close for Shade Tree work.
 
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2010 | 12:48 PM
  #10  
70 Bronco TX's Avatar
70 Bronco TX
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
From: Canyon, TX
Originally Posted by Moto Mel
You can find out the exact cid by pulling a spark plug and filling 1 cylinder that has the piston at the bottom of the stroke with a light oil, kerosene or diesel. To do this accurately you will need a burette with cc.s indicated or a measuring cup for measuring the cc.s of fork oil in a motorcycle. After finding the cc.s of 1 cylinder just multiply by 8 and then convert the cc.s to cubic inches. Then hand crank the engine to get the fluid out before you start it. This will be pretty close for Shade Tree work.
Wow, interesting idea...and sounds like it would give a pretty good measure using volume rather than area (OK, I'm not good with math terms, but I get the idea.) Thanks!
 
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2010 | 02:45 PM
  #11  
krewat's Avatar
krewat
FTE Leadership Emeritus
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 42,561
Likes: 423
From: Long Island USA
Club FTE Gold Member
Did you just measure the depth of the cylinder of #1 and #4 with #1 at TDC and subtract? Or did you measure BOTH cylinders separately?
 
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2010 | 04:40 PM
  #12  
Moto Mel's Avatar
Moto Mel
Postmaster
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,584
Likes: 3
From: Chesapeake, Va.
Originally Posted by 70 Bronco TX
Wow, interesting idea...and sounds like it would give a pretty good measure using volume rather than area (OK, I'm not good with math terms, but I get the idea.) Thanks!
Years ago the NHRA tech inspectors used a device called a P&G guage to determine the size of a racer's engine instead of having the heads come off, but too many guys got around that by just boring 7 cylinders oversize and praying that the techs would only check the easy to reach cylinder. After a while the techs caught on.
 
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2010 | 04:48 PM
  #13  
Rockstone's Avatar
Rockstone
Post Fiend
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 6,751
Likes: 3
From: Sin City
Originally Posted by Moto Mel
Years ago the NHRA tech inspectors used a device called a P&G guage to determine the size ogf a racer's engine instead of having the heads come off, but too many guys got around that by just boring 7 cylinders oversize and praying that the techs would only check the easy to reach cylinder. After a while the techs caught on.
Hah, that's a good one I hadn't heard before. Some of the stuff the Nascar guys used to do was pretty ingenious too, e.g. filling roll cages with nitrous, using extra long fuel lines for mileage, etc. It's only cheating if you get caught, right?
 
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2010 | 06:27 PM
  #14  
70 Bronco TX's Avatar
70 Bronco TX
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
From: Canyon, TX
Originally Posted by Krewat
Did you just measure the depth of the cylinder of #1 and #4 with #1 at TDC and subtract? Or did you measure BOTH cylinders separately?
I measured both cylinders at TDC on the same stick and measured the distance between the two marks. Rotor was pointing toward #1 wire on the cap....and the timing pointer was also at TDC. Correct procedure?
 

Last edited by 70 Bronco TX; Jul 26, 2010 at 06:29 PM. Reason: added info
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2010 | 08:43 PM
  #15  
Moto Mel's Avatar
Moto Mel
Postmaster
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,584
Likes: 3
From: Chesapeake, Va.
Originally Posted by Rockstone
Hah, that's a good one I hadn't heard before. Some of the stuff the Nascar guys used to do was pretty ingenious too, e.g. filling roll cages with nitrous, using extra long fuel lines for mileage, etc. It's only cheating if you get caught, right?

If memory serves, it was King Richard thet got caught with extra fuel in the frame or roll cage. Back then all of the teams had little tricks to get a better finish. NASCAR is a lot wiser to all that now and if a team gets caught the penalties are very severe.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ScallyWaggler
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
11
Mar 8, 2026 09:44 PM
trozei
Ford Inline Six, 200, 250, 4.9L / 300
40
Sep 12, 2020 09:22 PM
john mullen
1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
6
Sep 25, 2015 02:11 PM
460
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
31
Feb 7, 2007 11:44 PM
rustygreen76ford
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
10
Apr 10, 2004 11:34 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:19 AM.

story-0
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-02 21:45:57


VIEW MORE
story-1
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-30 18:33:59


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-3
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-5
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-6
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-7
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-9
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE