frame help
The po said it had a 9in in the rear and a nova clip up front.
I like the 9 inch but i do not want a nova clip. I want a mustang 2 front. (i want the truck to be all ford and i am also puttinga 531 stroker in it.)
Please help me understand what would be involved in sqaping over from the nova to a mustang 2.
Also any problems i could have with it being a 53 and not a 56. ( ithink this is not a problem but just checking.)
Thanks
Guys and Gals am I missing something here?
I wouldn't buy it. Like Jeff said, you'll need a complete stock frame as the MKII set up is different than the GM set up.
You're profile doesn't say where you're at and you're post doesn't say how far OR wide you're looking? Frames are out there but how far are you willing to go to get one?
Jim
and I would add that what everyone has said is probbly true. HOWEVER, understanding that the frame is just c channel it would be fairly easy to cut the offending clip off the front of the frame and fab in new front frame rails. Course, this depends on how you feel about metal fab and whether you're comfortable with it or not.
You could always use a frame reff chart to get the length right or you ask one of us to make some reff measurements. I have a painted 53 f100 frame propped up inside the garage along the side wall that I plan to use for some reference points on the frame I am working with now.
All that said, whats wrong with the clip thats on it? Going from a clip to a mustang based crossmember is lot of work to go through for no real gain. I wouldn't be affraid of a clipped frame but I would be sure to tripple check all the diamentions before you go any further with the build. Remember, its only metal and thats pretty darn easy to fix if its not right.
Trending Topics
I've never been a big fan of cutting a frame in half and then sticking something else on the front. That's my opinion and it's worth what you're paying for it. I have seen subframe jobs that looked great, but I have seen twice as many that looked like
or a chicken in socks, (pig in a tutu?!?)On the other hand if you go Mustang II crossmember, remember that it's based on the Pinto (yea, they rarely tell you that, Mustang sounds cooler). An Effie cab, bed and a V8 seems like a lot more weight. The ball joints and control arms would be the weak link. I guess it would also depend on what you plan to use the truck for... Mine have always been daily drivers, not weekend only show cars.
Either way you should find the most talented (read professional) welder you can afford. Your life, the lives of others and your classic truck are riding on it (Literally !)
Jim
ps: For a novel approach find a late 60's, early 70's twin I-beam. Bolt it to your frame through the rivet holes. It'll give you power steering, big disc brakes, it'd be all Ford and they're truck parts. I've checked the factory frame diagrams and it'd work. It'll drop the front end a bunch just in stock form and still have ground clearance.
pps: I have a factory assembly manual with frame diagrams.
Last edited by thx1138; Jul 16, 2010 at 08:10 PM. Reason: added info
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Quote:52 merc
I am in northern delaware and am willing to go about 100 miles maybe more for the perfect frame and if there are other parts too.
my 56 frame is a long bed and i want a short bed. I know about the "z" cut but i want a clean, nonchopped up frame.
Quote thx1138:
I am interested in your opinion on front assemblies. The reason i was leaning towards the m2 was because it seems like it will give a better ride, offers power steering, and will be able to corner better (anti-roll upgrade down the road)
I will be daily driving this and doing some towing when needed but not often.
What are your thoughts?
Thanks everyone,
also can you send me those factory assembly manual with frame diagrams.
Now, taking all this into consideration, the aftermarket kits have expanded on the strength of the design and made a stronger crossmember, and stronger control arms, joints and hardware. They are so far superior to what Ford built, the only similarity is the basic, compact design. These kits are engineered for our application. There is no issue with strength, durability, or practicality.
Sofob0909, I know you said you wanted "all Ford", but have you looked at the Dodge Dakota IFS. A guy near me is putting one under a '57 Chevy P/U, and he made that decision after thinking long and hard about the M2.
52 Merc, I respect your opinion, but, I disagree with it.
Just because something can be 'made to fit' doesn't quite fit my definition of 'engineered'. Except for some aftermarket control arms, nearly all the parts used in the M2's are the same as Ford made them. That's the big sell point - over the counter parts.
I wouldn't have a problem with an M2 for an occasional cruiser, but not a daily driver or work truck and not to tow much over a pop-up camper.
Always remember opinions are worth every penny you pay for them

Jim













