Jury Duty

Just wondering how everyone else feels about being selected for jury duty service?
I agree it should feel like an honor for me to serve, and I realize that it's my duty to do so as a United States citizen. I also agree that it is better to be judged by a group of "peers" rather than one person. But......................................
What I don't agree with is the selection process. I requested to be excused for the following reasons:
1.) I am the single custodial parent of a minor child (He lives with me). There is no way I can get him off to school, and then get to the court house on time. My son would also get home 1 hr. before court lets out for the day, and the court house is two towns away.
2.) I am self employed, and I am my only employee. This is my only income, and my business is not doing well at all these days. At this point and time, I literally can't afford to take 2 days off even if I'm sick, let alone for 5 days or 1 trial.
I get a response card in the mail stating: "JUROR SERVICE EXCUSE IS DENIED! YOU MUST REPORT".
Okay, technically I could make arrangements for my son, but as for my business I'm screwed!!
The last time I was denied and had to report, I sat next to this lady who had requested to be excused because she was the sole caretaker of her elderly sick mother, had no living relatives, and couldn't afford a nurse. Her excuse was denied, and she had to bring her sick mother with her to report! her mother weighed about 90 lbs., was pale as a ghost, in a wheelchair, and on oxygen! Why do they do this??
I realize a lot of people think it's a hassle, and don't want to be bothered but geez, do they have to resort to that?

I really wouldn't mind serving at all if my business was doing better, but I have no choice in the matter.
Last edited by Kenny; Jan 25, 2003 at 10:31 PM.
But consider the flip side: There are a lot of people who don't have a job or responsibilities and have so much time on their hands that they practicaly beg to get selected for a jury because it would make them feel important.
So if you were on trial, who would you rather have determine your fate...someone who has a life and responsibilities, or someone who doesn't have a clue what goes on in the real world?
California recently went to a one day jury obligation. So if you don't get picked for a jury that day, your obligation is over.
BTW, next Thursday I have to report for jury duty!
Scott
I got called a few months ago and I've got my own business to maintain. I was told to not even ask, because it would be denied. I reported for three days. The judge sent a personally signed letter after it was over thanking me for my service and he said he knew it was a hardship but that its a small price to pay for our court system and the freedoms we have. After getting that letter, I tend to agree with him. Three days off work is a small price compared to some who gave their lives....
Was interesting. Dont want to do it again.
BUT: Dont you want all the people picked to at least pay attention to what is going on in the courtroom? I feel that it is very important to do your best. What if it were you accused(wrongly, of course) and depended on that crew to do the right thing? Wouldn't you want to have people like you on the jury???
tom

Anyway Kenny I can see your dilemma, I am sure that you would love to "do the right thing" but at the same time you have to make sure you can put food on your table. Tough situation.... I wish you luck and I hope that the buisness picks up
Last edited by christop43; Jan 26, 2003 at 03:50 AM.
Cases in point, OJ Simpson, The Menedez brother, Rodney King, and the list goes on and on. TV shows have been made about the circus called jury pools.
After the Menedez trial a reported interviewed a juror (old lady) that said she voted not guilty because she just didn't think he killed his parents. The newscaster said, he admitted that he did it , the trial was about, was it justified being as they claim they were abused? The juror said, Oh, by the time that testimony came out, we were all so confused that we didn't know what was going on.
How would you like your freedom in the hands of that juror? I think people all try to get out of jury duty because they think it's an unpaid ($5.00) part in an silly tradition that keeps all the lawyers and judges rolling in money and power and many no longer think it's just or fair.
Trending Topics
Looks to me like it's time for you to move to Florida. They wouldn't care much about the single parent thing, but self-employed and only employee would have gotten you out of it down here.
I've been called for civil jury duty 3x but only got selected for 2 trials. The first was many years ago, the other 2 have been within the last 3 years. Luckily both trials were 1 dayers. The year between the civil jury duty things, I got called in for federal jury duty. (I sure hope I'm not on their mailing list now!) Anyway, the federal trial was a white collar insurance investment fraud and was going to last "3" months. When they guadiered us, they seemed to be asking me more questions than anyone else. The two people next to me said that I was sure to be one picked with what all they were asking me. It's the start of tax season so this was the last thing I needed. The judge, who knows my boss since we do alot of litigation work, was even asking me questions. He wanted to know if I was familiar with the type of business they were doing and I'm like sure, one of our biggest clients is an insurance agency. The defense attorney then asked me the name of the company and I told them. I was one of the first to be let go. Thank you client!
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
I agree about the business hardship aspect, and in fact was going to use it in the above criminal case, as it was spring planting time. Not sure if it would have gotten me excused, though.
At my job in town, if you get called for jury duty and have to miss work, they will pay you the difference between what you would have made working there and what you get paid for jury duty. And depending on your postion there, they might be able to have you declared a vital employee. I don't think I would have qualified on that account... I'm just a lowly yard driver there, and I'm pretty sure that the company could find a replacement in a pinch.

Thanks for all the great and very understanding replies! Things said here made a lot of sense to me. I guess if I put my self in the juror selector's shoes, it wouldn't be an easy job to tell who is lying to be excused, or who is a true hardship case.
I know my post probably sounded like a rant, but the truth is I was not angry. I was only upset about my circumstances, and very worried about making ends meet.
Worrying won't help any, so I'm gonna stop it. I'll just go in there, and do my duty. Whatever happens, will happen.
When I show up, there's still a chance I might not even be picked.
Not to worry though, I would absolutely do the right thing if picked!

It really angered me when I saw on the news that a jury decided a mans fate by flipping a coin!
I also saw the movie "12 angry men", and thought it really sucked how people conducted themselves because they didn't want to be there!
I always try to put myself in other's shoes and look at the whole picture.
Ken, you're right! This is a small sacrifice compared to the sacrifice others have made for our country, including their lives. Thanks for the eye opener!
Two years later, I'm called again. I believe that there is normally a three year buffer between times of duty but that doesn't matter here. I had to push it off because I was scheduled to be out of town that peticular week. No prob.
They re-schedule me three months later. The same time my wife was due to give birth to my son.
I re-schedule again, no prob. I go and it lasts two day's. Cool.
Three months later I'm hit up for duty again. I had to go but they released me after they realized I was there previously.
You could always do what my wife did. Just bring the kid's. Not much we could do, daycare was not happening on those peticular dates...
I think the lawyers choose jurists who may or may not have experience with the subject at hand. The two times I actually was in the final selection process(didn't get called in the other 4 times) they seemed to key in on life experience with whatever we were there for. In my case, one was drug experience(I worked in a liquor store in Hollywood, what can I say) and the other was being a parent(that was a molestation case).
In the drug case I was tossed out since I had a pretty good eye for people high on dope. The moelstation case I was selected for since I had two kids.
The jurists I was with on the molestation case came from all walks of life, and in my opinion were all of good character and reasonably intelligent. We debated the case quite a bit for a couple days and attacked from various angles. I was proud of the debate we carried on. Our decision would affect the life of the defendent, the victim and their families for years to come. Bot something to be tossed off lightly or by a bunch of sterotypical morons.
So yes jury duty can be an inconvenience, but the one time I was on a case and the couple times I actually got to be in the selection process or at least the orientation, I learned a lot and was thoroughly involved in the process. I would not like to make it a regular habit but I would say doing it a few times in your life is worthwhile if you can afford the time.
I do believe that all too often the advantages are on the side of the defendent, but if the system works, it works well. It is the media circuses that give the legal system a bad name and ther are all kinds of flaming hoops put up before the courts can bring a perp to trial.
The one day service or one trial makes it much easier than a few years ago where I was on call for a month.
Jim Henderson










