Notices
Oil & Lubrication  

oil cooler

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 16, 2010 | 04:35 PM
  #1  
stevetford's Avatar
stevetford
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
From: western Kentucky
oil cooler

I have a 1988 F250 4 wd with the 460. The engine is bad and I have a 1994 460 to put in it's place. The 88 engine uses a oil to air cooler while the 94 engine uses oil to coolant heat exchanger. Does anyone here have any suggestions as to what oil cooling method I should use? The swap is straight forward, I just have to swap water pumps depending on what system I use. The main reason for me asking is because I have more than once had factory oil to coolant coolers fail, but they were different design than the Ford. I perfer the oil to air that is on the truck now but thought I would ask for some opinions before I do anything. Thanks.

Steve
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2010 | 08:28 AM
  #2  
pawpaw's Avatar
pawpaw
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,851
Likes: 111
From: SW Va
Club FTE Gold Member
If your oil to air cooler is thermostatically controlled, such that the cooler is bypassed in winter, when you don't need cooling, or as much cooling & is large enough so it'll properly cool in summer, for the heat load it'll see when your towing, or hauling, then go with the oil to air cooler.

The oil to water cooler automatically gets some temp regulation for the oil, from the engines thermostat controlling the coolants temp, but it means the coolant system has to carry the extra heat load, so you'll want to make sure the cooling system is in cood condition & closely looked after, or you could quickly get into an over heat condition, especially in summer with the A/C & a load on.

So, both systems have their points, but like you, I think I would prefer the oil to air system, but only IF it's thermostatically controlled.

If it isn't thermoststically controlled, maybe consider a new flat plate design that is.

They are more efficient than the tube & fin design coolers,
so are smaller in size to fit in tight spaces & still get the job done.

Some thoughts to ponder.
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2010 | 04:53 PM
  #3  
stevetford's Avatar
stevetford
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
From: western Kentucky
Thanks for the thoughts pawpaw. I had the same concerns about the added load on the cooling system with the oil to coolant system, especially on the summer hauling horses around. I have yet to get the motor out of the truck and get a good look at how the oil to air system works, so I am unsure if the system is thermostat controlled. I will know this weekend.
One thing that I would like to know is why Ford changed to the oil to coolant system? Who knows, I am sure I will keep the oil to air cooler anyways. When I get the two apart and compare side by side I will let everyone know. Maybe by then I will know how to post pictures on this site. Thanks again.

Steve
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2010 | 07:38 PM
  #4  
pawpaw's Avatar
pawpaw
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,851
Likes: 111
From: SW Va
Club FTE Gold Member
Well I don't really know why they did it, but it probably had to do with saving money a number of ways, like not having to specify, order, inventory & install another part.

With the oil to water cooling system all they had to do is add another piece of aluminum tubing to the cold side radiator tank & hook up the two hoses.

The oil to water system may have had a larger radiator & water pump though, to handle the extra heat load.

In the winter, this system would get the oil up to operating temp faster & keep it there in really cold temps, so it had it's advantages.

Whatever you decde to do about the oil to air cooler, be sure to size it right for the heat load it'll be dealing with.

I forgot to add in my other post, that the flat plate coolers also have lower back pressure than the tube & fin coolers.
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2010 | 08:30 PM
  #5  
stevetford's Avatar
stevetford
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
From: western Kentucky
Well actually, the 88 and 94 truck both use the exact same radiator. On the 94 oil to water cooler the lower radiator hose connects to one side of the cooler then out of the cooler through about 3" of hose and into the water pump. The whole cooler assembly bolts to the oil filter boss and has a relocated position for the oil filter. I am sure cost had something to do with Ford adapting this setup, but who knows. If I ever get the chance to post pictures I will post them here so you can see the setup.
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2010 | 08:41 PM
  #6  
pawpaw's Avatar
pawpaw
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,851
Likes: 111
From: SW Va
Club FTE Gold Member
Yup pictures would be interesting.

The oil is designed to do it's thing at about 190F, so the oil to water cooler would warm it up operating temp quickly in winter & cool it down in summer, so there is something to be said for the oil to water cooling system.

Interesting that there doesn't seem to be any difference in the cooling system, between the two.
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2010 | 08:55 PM
  #7  
stevetford's Avatar
stevetford
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
From: western Kentucky
The only differences up to this point are the water pump and lower radiator hose and of corse the oil filter mount. Luckily this makes it easy to use either setup.
Maybe you would know looking at you post count. Is there a certain number of post I must reach to post pictures or must I have a premium membership. I have read all the FAQ'S, but when I reply to a message or start a new thread there is no option to add a picture. Any idea?
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2010 | 09:10 PM
  #8  
pawpaw's Avatar
pawpaw
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,851
Likes: 111
From: SW Va
Club FTE Gold Member
I don't remember what the requirements are to be able to post photos, but you could do it in something like photobucket & then post a link to that.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-2

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-4

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-5

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-8

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SoCalAngler
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
18
Aug 20, 2016 10:42 AM
jflo631
6.0L Power Stroke Diesel
50
Oct 17, 2011 06:34 AM
rhoward
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
2
Nov 12, 2009 07:41 PM
steve mather
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
20
Nov 7, 2009 06:44 AM
77 steve
Pre-Power Stroke Diesel (7.3L IDI & 6.9L)
7
Jan 22, 2006 07:35 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:05 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-1
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-3
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-4
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-5
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-7
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE