When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Ideally, I want to see the two standards, with the precise setup and procedure described, posted.
Have to road trip that one on your own, in short, you measure the oil flow through a standard sized aperture in a given period of time at 2 different temperatures. Being vague here but that is about it......Now I need to change my oil
Even if you change your oil more often than you change your underwear, a by-pass system keeps it cleaner all the time and nothing could be wrong with that?
Without a 1 micron filter there is 4500 times more particles than with!
And of course, as long as the truck is under warranty you should not interfer with factory recommendations.
There have been posts in the past that showed oil analyses with a bypass filter and without. There were no appreciable differences between the two after the normal service interval. A bypass filter is of little use for an engine that is running well and fluid that is being changed at the proper service life. It can be useful in circumstances of severe service or when a component might fail. As far as going past the recommended service interval, that has been addressed very well - No bypass filter can restore a 40 weight viscosity that has dropped to almost a 20 weight in 7500 miles. It also can not restore detergent properties that have deteriorated from service life (reaction with soot and acids formed from combustion). The data is out there on a 6.0L application - which is the only thing that is of consequence on a 6.0L forum.
revolverivar...we're not just talking contaminants in the oil. We're also talking oil breakdown. Please remember that the 6.0 diesel uses high pressure oil to make our injectors function. This creates a whole 'nother issue for us.
The dirt comes from combustion and thats the largest source of wear on your engine. Acids and water binds particles and make more wear. Remove it in an efficiant filter and you reduce wear, its no rocketscience.
Thats why I would have a bypass filter even if I changed oil every day. In any other case I agree with you all. We all want the same thing, the best care for our trucks.
Why does the Ford 6.0 destroy the viscosuty worse than another engine?
The dirt comes from combustion and thats the largest source of wear on your engine. Acids and water binds particles and make more wear. Remove it in an efficiant filter and you reduce wear, its no rocketscience.
Thats why I would have a bypass filter even if I changed oil every day. In any other case I agree with you all. We all want the same thing, the best care for our trucks.
Why does the Ford 6.0 destroy the viscosuty worse than another engine?
This is all discussed at length on BITOG site. Many Triobologists there, so access to "experts" is not an issue.
Do some oil analysis on your oil at the end of a service run. Post it here. Also, compare it to the posted 6.0L UOA on BITOG for the same oil. I doubt you will see any difference. You are right - it truly isn't rocket science (this has all been done many tmes over in the past 6 years). Almost every type of oil has been analyzed multiple times. A bypass filter will no doubt reduce wear. The question is "will it reduce it enough to make a difference in the length of time you plan on owning your truck (and before something else fails and causes you to sell it)".
One of FTE members (IIRC - Beachbumcook) did a comparison of oil analysis with and without a bypass filter. The results were posted here. I will see if I saved the links.
Oil viscosity issues in the 6.0L engine come primarily from the abuse the oil takes in the HEUI system (tolerance, pressures and heat, shear forces, etc in the HPOP, IPR, injectors).