Notices
6.4L Power Stroke Diesel Engine fitted to 2008 - 2010 F250, F350 and F450 pickup trucks and F350 + Cab Chassis

Fuel Milage

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 19, 2009 | 04:52 AM
  #31  
ruschejj's Avatar
ruschejj
Post Fiend
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 6,521
Likes: 11
From: Greenwood, SC
Club FTE Gold Member
The additive makes sense. Improved combustion should reduce soot and improve economy as long as the sensors/computers in the truck can recognize that the fuel is being used more efficiently. I used the Motorcraft stuff for maybe a year.

I stopped using it because towing a trailer seemed to negate any benefit. I did not notice less frequent regens, better economy, more power. BUT, towing just about any kind of trailer makes the MPG's go down so much, fuel consumption is so much more, I don't think I was winning the battle. If any of you drive 4,000 miles or more each month with small/large trailers I would suggest that the additive is not worth it. Burning 2 to 3 tanks of fuel most days just kills any advantage. In my opinion anyway!

When I am not working and I can go 1 1/2 weeks without filling up the tank, doing short "errand" trips, I can see that it would be a good idea to use the additive.
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2009 | 12:31 PM
  #32  
aquaman's Avatar
aquaman
Posting Guru
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,006
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
Don't mean to hijack the thread, but what brand of gas are you guys using? Does using 'name branded' diesel not need additives as much?

I've got about 2K on the clock and driving mostly unloaded around town so far. I'm on my 5th tank of Shell. First regen was around 1200miles presumably because the DPF was new. I'm getting short regens every 250~300miles. Hand-calculated mileage around town has been creeping upwards since getting the truck new. Started at 13.4-ish. Now I'm pushing 14.5 but that might because I had a couple more freeway runs on the last tank.
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2009 | 09:58 AM
  #33  
zachlaplante's Avatar
zachlaplante
New User
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Change to rear end

Hi, I'm new to the forum and new to large diesel trucks. I was a long time owner of a 93 F-150. I traded it in for a 2008 F-250 with the 6.4l diesel and a 3.73 rear end. While shopping, I noticed the new 2010 F-250s offer a 3.55 rear end. The sales guy said it was to help mileage and noted that the 6.4L had plenty of torque, even with the 3.55. Has anyone considered changing the rear end to the 3.55 ratio? Can it be retro fitted to the 2008? Is it worth it? I'm wondering what more experience owners think.
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2009 | 10:57 AM
  #34  
R-T0r21on's Avatar
R-T0r21on
More Turbo
15 Year Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 525
Likes: 8
From: Centerbrook, Ct.
Originally Posted by zachlaplante
Hi, I'm new to the forum and new to large diesel trucks. I was a long time owner of a 93 F-150. I traded it in for a 2008 F-250 with the 6.4l diesel and a 3.73 rear end. While shopping, I noticed the new 2010 F-250s offer a 3.55 rear end. The sales guy said it was to help mileage and noted that the 6.4L had plenty of torque, even with the 3.55. Has anyone considered changing the rear end to the 3.55 ratio? Can it be retro fitted to the 2008? Is it worth it? I'm wondering what more experience owners think.

What wheel size do you have? Re gearing can be done, but I think it's probably not worth the $$. If you have 18" wheels, you could go up to the 20" and end up with pretty much the same effective gear ratio. 20" wheels ain't cheap either though.... I believe the 3.55 ratio rearend is only available with the 18" wheels. Probably the cheapest way to get the effective ratio with 18" wheels is to just go up 1 tire size (approx. 35" tire as opposed to the 33" OEM tire).
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2009 | 02:16 PM
  #35  
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 25,479
Likes: 742
From: Isanti, MN
Club FTE Gold Member
I don't see the 3.55s as being a huge amount better for efficiency than the 3.73s. The difference is somewhere around 80 RPMs difference in overdrive.

If you really want to try it out, cruise at your normal speed for a tank and then cruise a bit slower to lower your RPMs by 80. The MPG improvement will be greater than a simple regear due to the decreased wind resistance, but even so I don't think it'll be a huge amount.

If you stand to gain .2 MPGs, and you spend $2K to do it, are you really better off?
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2009 | 04:19 PM
  #36  
percyad's Avatar
percyad
Junior User
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by aquaman
Don't mean to hijack the thread, but what brand of gas are you guys using? Does using 'name branded' diesel not need additives as much?
I've used a wide a wide range of brands, but not noticed any pattern or difference based on brand. Besides, my friends at the fuel depot tell me they all come from the same bulk tank.
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2009 | 04:52 PM
  #37  
richfaa's Avatar
richfaa
Elder User
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 588
Likes: 1
From: N.Ridgeville, Ohio
I see many different things than many of you..Yes during regen the MPG goes down...It has to as fuel is beig introduced into the DPF to burn off the soot and is not turning the wheels. However at the end of the day towing or not the MPG will be the same that is the regen has no noticable effect on MPG.. It might if you drive for 30 mins and it regens for 20 mins but if you are doing a 8 /10 hour run there is no ddiference. I can see the effect on my after market gage and the initial EGT will increase as much as 500 degrees when regen starts but drops off at a steady rate as regen goes on which suggest that the same amount of fuel is not being introduced int o the DPF during the entire regen.??? As for additives....For me they do increase the MPG and the ruck runs better with the cetene booster. To see the effect, if any, you must run several tanks without..then several tanks with. It makes a difference both towing and not towing. When here in Florida for the winter we use Shell premiun Diesel that has a cetene rating of 50 + and the additive is not needed.
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2009 | 06:57 PM
  #38  
aquaman's Avatar
aquaman
Posting Guru
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,006
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
I read somewhere Ford was claiming anywhere between 0.4~0.9mpg improvement with the 3.55's compared to the 3.73's... under optimum conditions, of course. Like driving at 45mph in 5th, empty.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-3

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-5

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-9

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
Old Nov 20, 2009 | 07:26 PM
  #39  
StanleyZ's Avatar
StanleyZ
Logistics Pro
20 Year Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,787
Likes: 102
From: Georgia
Originally Posted by aquaman
I read somewhere Ford was claiming anywhere between 0.4~0.9mpg improvement with the 3.55's compared to the 3.73's... under optimum conditions, of course. Like driving at 45mph in 5th, empty.
Don't forget downhill and with a tail wind.
 
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2009 | 10:32 AM
  #40  
kylebryan's Avatar
kylebryan
Senior User
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
diesel kleen

Well i tried the diesel kleen product and i got about 3/4 mpg better. If you buy the 250 galloon treatment jug it cost about $1.50 per tank so it actually pays for itself if it stays consistent. looks like im sitting about where everyone else and getting about 12.5 and now about 13.25.
 
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2009 | 01:12 AM
  #41  
killaguerilla's Avatar
killaguerilla
Freshman User
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: cali
08 6.4 suoerduty . edge programmer, volant fender badge style intake, 14.4 mpg drops to 14.2 if i;m empty, 14.4 usually loaded, stompping on it what ever i'm doing 14.4
 
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2009 | 08:20 PM
  #42  
Medic 66's Avatar
Medic 66
Posting Guru
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,460
Likes: 0
14 city and 16 to 18 highway depending on speed limit and such
 
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2009 | 11:36 PM
  #43  
killaguerilla's Avatar
killaguerilla
Freshman User
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: cali
ive used the diesel kleen three times spaced out every third tank and noticed alittle more power slightly longer duration between dpf burn off and .2 mpg gain on the end of the treated tank and through the 2nd tank , slowly drops back to 14.4
 
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2009 | 03:25 PM
  #44  
RuralSurvivalGuide's Avatar
RuralSurvivalGuide
Freshman User
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
From: No. California
'09 F250 3.55's best tank 17 mpg babying it, 9.5 towing-completly stock. Best tank at 2500 mi.
 
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2009 | 04:52 PM
  #45  
richfaa's Avatar
richfaa
Elder User
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 588
Likes: 1
From: N.Ridgeville, Ohio
"Originally Posted by richfaa
The truck and 5th wheel combo weighs nearly 23K. We average 9/10.5 depending on conditions..... that is not bad. That is doing 62/65 MPH. These are not race cars.

Actually that's pretty good mileage for these trucks. What size truck and ratio on the differential? BTW, does that faa on your handle have something to do with the FAA?


4:10 diff..F-350 4X4,LB,CC, Dually.. Yes the FAA means we did 37 1/2 Years in the FAA

Electronic Tech..most at Cle ARTCC (ZOB) Wife also Air Traffic control
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:19 PM.

story-0
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-30 18:33:59


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-2
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-4
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-5
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-6
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-8
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-9
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE