Notices
2007 - 2014 Expedition & Navigator 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014 Ford Expedition and Lincoln Navigator

MPG Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 13, 2009 | 05:01 PM
  #1  
homepukes's Avatar
homepukes
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
From: Fayette County GA
MPG Question

Any body done any mods to improve gas milage? I get about 18 on the highway 14 or so in town. My wife with the lead foot gets about 12.5 city. I have a 2007 EL 2wd. Had the "clunk" in the transmission when stopping and took it in a couple of weeks ago for the fix and it works great now.
 
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2009 | 05:04 PM
  #2  
eddiemoney's Avatar
eddiemoney
Senior User
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Best things off the shelf you can do is intake, exhaust, and a tune to match everything up.
 
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2009 | 07:03 PM
  #3  
Tylus's Avatar
Tylus
MMNC (SS)(Ret)
Veteran: Navy
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 11,587
Likes: 141
From: SE Georgia
Club FTE Silver Member

pretty much nothing, but driving it smartly and keeping the maintenance up


you can get it some custom programming for the ECM. Will run you about $500. It will give you way better HP/TQ gains, and you should see MPG gains if you keep your foot out of it.


but $500 for a tiny MPG gain isn't economical...unless of course you want the performance gains, and the MPG's is how you justify it to the wife.
 
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2009 | 07:05 PM
  #4  
Tylus's Avatar
Tylus
MMNC (SS)(Ret)
Veteran: Navy
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 11,587
Likes: 141
From: SE Georgia
Club FTE Silver Member

btw, even with custom tuning and every bolt-on in the world...we are only talking about maybe a 1 mpg gain. nothing world changing. The Expedition is just too heavy.

conversely, with my Mustang and similar mods, I could see gains of up to 3 MPG and 30-40 HP.

but it also wieghs 1/2 the weight of the Expy, with almost identical HP/TQ values
 
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2009 | 09:12 PM
  #5  
eddiemoney's Avatar
eddiemoney
Senior User
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Most guys I am seeing with a 5 star tune are getting 1-2 mpg better. That pays itself off in just a couple years.
 
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2009 | 10:46 AM
  #6  
1Aauto's Avatar
1Aauto
Former Vendor
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 8,098
Likes: 10
From: Westford, MA
If you use dyno oil switch to Mobil 1 or Castrol synthetic.I did it in my 04 Jeep Cherokee and gained 2 miles/gallon.

It adds up.
 
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2009 | 01:15 PM
  #7  
homepukes's Avatar
homepukes
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
From: Fayette County GA
Originally Posted by eddiemoney
Most guys I am seeing with a 5 star tune are getting 1-2 mpg better. That pays itself off in just a couple years.
What is this? Got a web site?
 
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2009 | 08:42 PM
  #8  
eddiemoney's Avatar
eddiemoney
Senior User
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
I am actually in conversation with Mike from 5 star tuning right now looking for support for my 2010. Looks promising.

Just google 5 star tuning, it is the first link. Search around this forum (more so in the F150, super duty sections) and you will find testimonials. I am seeing V10 guys go from 7mpg to 10mpg with just the economy tune.
 
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 12:21 AM
  #9  
benshere's Avatar
benshere
Posting Guru
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,017
Likes: 3
From: Longwood, Fl
I have noticed on my 07 EL that it is very important to use a light foot around town. My mileage seems to go down hard when you go too deep in first gear, that 4.17 is just to start the momentum. I would like to see some lockout for first, other than a manual shift for that very light town driving. Even 2nd gear is in the 3's, which is way lower than anyother FoMoCo automatic I have driven in the past. I have tried a 2nd takeoff in easy traffic and it works very well (.02) except it requires manual shifting on up from there. Yes, I am very well aware just how heavy these things are.

I'm thinking (see if anyone else agrees with me) that the enrichment starts at a fairly small drop in manifold vacuum, so the light foot is very important. It was/is hard for me to let the soccer moms in their mini vans (you know the type) go ahead and run on off at the lights.

I have never run the actual numbers for mpg, just used the display, but it seems to me that (for some reason) any prolonged idling makes that avg go to *** in a handbasket. Since the processor does a running average, you wouldn't think idling would have that big an effect, but it seems that way to me. Thats my story and I am stickin to it
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1958 Ford F250
1957 - 1960 F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
18
Oct 21, 2013 10:37 PM
lucky_strike
1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
11
Jul 2, 2010 07:10 PM
1955effie
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
16
Oct 22, 2006 03:38 PM
Perschml
1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
3
Aug 30, 2003 04:42 PM
SAR Ranger
Fuel Injection, Carburetion & Fuel System
6
Dec 27, 2002 03:52 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:35 AM.