Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks

302 vs 351 mpg

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 20, 2008 | 10:14 AM
  #1  
CT's Avatar
CT
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
From: 3 mi N of Crookston, NE
Question 302 vs 351 mpg

I have a 1995 F-150 4x4 with a 302 and 4R70W auto transmission. The motor and trans both have a lot of miles, so I was thinking of replacing with a 351. If everything is the same, is there much of a decrease in mpg for a 351 versus the 302? Currently averaging 15-16 with the 302. If I also changed to the E4OD transmission, are the dimensions the same? I realize I would have to change the computer to make it all work.
Thanks for any input
 
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2008 | 10:38 AM
  #2  
TOM-PLAY_95_EXPRESS's Avatar
TOM-PLAY_95_EXPRESS
Junior User
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
From: Gonzales,LA
I think the 302 will get a little bit better gas milage not much since its a hair smaller and the heads are angled slightly different than the 351.


The E40D Trans is a little bit longer than the 4R70W as far as I'm aware of. I had a '92 F-150 with a E40D and currently have a '95 F-150 with the 4R70W .The 4R70W hasn't let me down yet. can't say the same about E40D which i had to rebuild. My Opinion I would stick with the same setup.
 
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2008 | 10:44 AM
  #3  
Hakk's Avatar
Hakk
Senior User
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
From: Minneapolis
I've read at least one guy on the internet who said he thinks 302s suck for mileage and he gets as good or better with a 351. Doesn't make a lot of sense to me, though.

IMO it's all about driving habits and what you want. If you are using the truck as a daily commuter and money is tight, the 302 would be cheaper because you don't have to change anything and it should get slightly better mileage. If you mostly only use it to tow or for fun and money isn't that important to you, the 351 is better bragging rights and has more torque/power. That's why I sold my '92 302 F150 and bought a '91 351 F250.
 
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2008 | 10:53 AM
  #4  
CT's Avatar
CT
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
From: 3 mi N of Crookston, NE
Unhappy RE-302 vs 351 mpg

My 4R70W is currently blown for the second time, part of the reason I was considering swapping the engine also. A friend told me the E4OD always came behind the 351 from the factory, and was a little heavier-duty transmission. Maybe the heavier transmission would decrease mpg also.
 
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2008 | 10:57 AM
  #5  
mstngmikegt's Avatar
mstngmikegt
Senior User
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
From: Iowa
I have the same combo as you do and have been playing with the idea of swapping in a 351 for the 302 in the interest of power but have come to the conclusion that:
1. Since Ford never put a 351 and 4R70W combo together, the flywheel (flexplate) is a real issue (if someone knows of the right one that won't kill the trans let me know). For that reason only if you do the swap, you will need to swap in the E4OD, etc to make it happen.
2. Unless purely power is the issue you are probably better off sticking with what you have. From what I have been able to find out, the 4R70W is actually a pretty good tranny and with some relatively easy add on's (LT headers, exhaust, timing, etc) the 302 can be "perked up" a bit for power (torque) without hurting MPG. Am thinking a gear change is probably the next thing that will help that 302 but haven't decided if it is worth the possible MPG loss for the effort. Mine is 3.31 now with 31's.

Just saw that your 4R70W is D.O.A. If you can get a good buy on the combo 351 and E4OD then it might be worthwhile (but still more expensive than just replacing the
4R70W especially when you consider the rest of the stuff you need to swap to make that work).
In normal driving, I suspect the MPG would end up being very close because of the additional torque of the 351 but that all depends on your use and the weight of your right foot.
 
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2008 | 05:25 PM
  #6  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
On average there not a lot of difference in milage betwen the 2 motors, the 5.8 may do a little worst around town because it's a bigger motor. But it also tends to do a little better on the highway because it makes more TQ and doesn't require as many downshifts.. depending upon the tranny, the electronic autos are shift happy without some aftermarket tuning. My 351 only produced about 13mpg city, but managed close to 18mpg hwy. It's getting replaced with a 302 while I add some new performance parts to the 5.8, I'll be running the smaller motor for the rest of the summer at least while I collect what I need for the 5.8, so I should have some comparison numbers soon.
 
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2008 | 07:29 PM
  #7  
mikeindmills's Avatar
mikeindmills
Junior User
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
From: Chatsworth
I never had a 302 in a truck, but i had a 95 150 4x4 with a 351 that got about 15 around town and 18 on the highway(in the hills, too). Its all about power to weight. of course my 302 crown vic used to get 24mpg on the highway but thats a different story.
 
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2008 | 08:20 PM
  #8  
netscaner's Avatar
netscaner
Elder User
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 754
Likes: 1
From: Solon, Ohio
Mileage as mostly about total weight of the vehicle and driving habits.

Of course you will drive it differently with a different engine it.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-3

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-5

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-9

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
Old Jul 21, 2008 | 01:43 PM
  #9  
lostin90s's Avatar
lostin90s
Postmaster
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,978
Likes: 0
From: Central PA
Milage depeds on area. The 351 is a good tow motor . But I live in hilly area. I run the 302s And still tow.

I currently have both and have had 19 plus Ftrucks . I get 15+ (and up to 18 ) MPG on 302 .I never broke 14 MPG Around my area with 351. So its up to you . The 351 will last/tow better . I'd avoid the e4od . After blowing 3 in a row I'm going ZF the next round.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Super Econoline
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
18
Oct 4, 2012 09:41 PM
Major94
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
11
Jun 12, 2012 11:01 PM
rapterman101
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
1
Nov 18, 2008 03:26 PM
imlowr2
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
19
Dec 4, 2007 06:57 PM
blatherskite
335 Series- 5.8/351M, 6.6/400, 351 Cleveland
2
Jun 3, 2004 10:40 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:43 PM.

story-0
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-30 18:33:59


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-2
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-4
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-5
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-6
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-8
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-9
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE