Notices
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel  
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: DP Tuner

MAP-Maximizer or Overboost Annihilator

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 23, 2011 | 04:47 PM
  #16  
JIA's Avatar
JIA
Junior User
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 93
Likes: 2
I've been looking at the Sinister and RiffRaff solutions to defueling.

My question is - is there a drawback? Will the injectors (mine are currently stock with stock turbo) keep up with the increased air flow with the higher boost levels?
 
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2011 | 07:35 PM
  #17  
UNTAMND's Avatar
UNTAMND
Logistics Pro
15 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,635
Likes: 3
From: Lansdale, PA
there are no drawbacks to the orc or annihilator
I have the itp brand, and it needed a tweak to keep my cel at bay once i got into the 30psi range.
you will not need any tuning or anything.
The injectors are fine for what the stock turbo can produce...for the most part.
 
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2011 | 08:07 PM
  #18  
duck fan's Avatar
duck fan
Because racetruck
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,786
Likes: 104
From: Monterey Bay, CA
Club FTE Silver Member

Sinister? You mean ITP? Or whatever their name is this week...

Has anyone noticed that their OBA has changed? Looks to be a copy of the Riffraff OCR. Looks like Dennis figured out what we already know. Clay and the gang at Riffraff are #1
 
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2011 | 10:45 PM
  #19  
big poppa's Avatar
big poppa
Post Fiend
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 10,977
Likes: 5
From: Lancaster, Pa.
I got Clay's OCR and no more defueling issues here, great product.. Hey Bob, just fixed it...
 
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2011 | 10:50 PM
  #20  
Bob Taulbee's Avatar
Bob Taulbee
Duct Tape Tech.
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,381
Likes: 1
From: San Antonio Tx.
Mike I think you mean you have Clay's OCR Overboost Code Regulator. Great product.
 
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2011 | 11:00 PM
  #21  
rat49f6's Avatar
rat49f6
Postmaster
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,005
Likes: 3
From: Mcafee, NJ
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by duck fan
Sinister? You mean ITP? Or whatever their name is this week...

Has anyone noticed that their OBA has changed? Looks to be a copy of the Riffraff OCR. Looks like Dennis figured out what we already know. Clay and the gang at Riffraff are #1
Clay's still looks better and is cheaper
 
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2011 | 11:00 AM
  #22  
65superduty's Avatar
65superduty
Junior User
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
I was told to not even bother with the annihalator unless I had a chip or some tuner. the stock srttings would not even reach the threshhold of the higher boost and extra fuel. apparently, I have been given erroneous information. however, I have had extremely good luck with this truck fairly untouched. the only mods are the ford/donaldson intake and 4" turbo back exhaust. I do not want to lose that reliability. what say you, fellow FTE's?
 
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2011 | 11:07 AM
  #23  
Bob Taulbee's Avatar
Bob Taulbee
Duct Tape Tech.
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,381
Likes: 1
From: San Antonio Tx.
65superduty, if you do not make over 23 lbs of boost, you don't need anything to control overboost and should be good to go
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-2

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-4

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-5

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-8

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Jan 24, 2011 | 11:22 AM
  #24  
65superduty's Avatar
65superduty
Junior User
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
soooo, the maximizer or the OCR would work reliably as a stand alone mod? given, of course, that I do not overboost...and I highly doubt it will reach 23 psi.
 
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2011 | 05:45 PM
  #25  
knuckleheadnut's Avatar
knuckleheadnut
Senior User
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
From: Stafford, Virginia
OCRs, OBAs, BRV+ and all other variations thereof, do not "control overboost". All they do is deceive the MAP sensor by preventing it from seeing boost pressures above 22-23 psi (regardless of how much boost you are actually producing with your setup). And in doing so, they prevent the MAP sensor from forcing the ECM to defuel the injectors. In the stock setup the ECM prevents overboost by cutting back the fuel supply until the boost pressure drops to factory specs. Once the map sensor is taken out of the loop with a boost deceiving device, the only way to prevent dangerous boost levels is with some type of wastegate and wastegate actuator (or the skinny pedal), that is assuming your setup is capable of even reaching high boost levels. And there are primarly 2 types of wastegate setups, mechanical and solenoid controlled. Some more effective than others, depending on what your needs and wants are. Mechanical (such as Turbomaster)are fully adjustable and entirely independent of any engine feedback parameters and therefore are not controlled by the ECM. The solenoid controlled (Bighead) rely on boost pressure input to/from a solenoid and subsequent feedback from the ECM. They are much more difficult to adjust and IMO less effective at regulating boost pressure correctly b/c of their inherent design and required feedback loop, and less reliable b/c of the diaphragm which is ultimately prone to failure. At any rate, IMO, if your running a stock ECM program (ie, no tunes) than you won't see any benefit from mods to the MAP sensor loop and next to none with an aftermarket WG actuator.

Hope this clears up this thread discussion somewhat. I found it very confusing to follow. Comparing apples to oranges, and bananas to beer, got my head spinning. Just thought I would try to help. And of course, everyone has their own preference for these mods and their individual requirements depending on their setup and usage.
 
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2011 | 08:23 AM
  #26  
65superduty's Avatar
65superduty
Junior User
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
thanks knucleheadnut for the clarification. since i am really enjoying the reliability this truck exemplifies, and the hp/torque is adequate, i will refrain from mods that monkey with the stock settings. it only has 101,000 on it, so it's barely broke in.
thanks again.
 
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2011 | 01:04 PM
  #27  
Strictly Diesel's Avatar
Strictly Diesel
FTE Sponsor
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by duck fan
Sinister? You mean ITP? Or whatever their name is this week...
Thanks...as if we "wanted" the hassle and cost involved with changing the name again. If you had any idea how much money we're out over this you might offer some sympathy instead of wisecracks.

Has anyone noticed that their OBA has changed? Looks to be a copy of the Riffraff OCR. Looks like Dennis figured out what we already know. Clay and the gang at Riffraff are #1
I take EXTREME offense to this. I do NOT copy other people (though I can think of a handful of others that have done it to me). The fixed pressure regulator we are using (and that it appears Clay is using also) is made by the same company as the adjustable regulator we were using. I've known about them for quite some time, but due to the cost I stuck with the adjustable ones. Unfortunately, I got tired of having people mess with the adjustment of the old regulators before reading the directions (heck, I even had a note on the website about they being "preset" and not needing adjustment). I've heard every excuse out there (kid did it, buddy did it, wife did it, no idea who did it, etc). I finally decided that the cost difference was worth reducing the number of phone calls, the amount of time explaining how to reset it, the amount of money people spent sending them back to me when they couldn't adjust themselves, etc.

Next time, think twice before making public accusations about me copying someone elses products. If you look at my product line, you'll see a number of products that I purchase from others. If you think for one minute that I couldn't copy the KCM HPX line (I've already got a CNC tube bending shop I use for fuel systems), the CCV kit, the S.S. Engine Cover or any number of other products I get from others, you're sadly mistaken. Rather than ripping other people off and stealing their ideas for the sole purpose of putting more money in my pocket, I actually purchase from the ones that came up with the idea. They get paid for their idea and my customers benefit. I treat my suppliers the same way I'd want to be treated with my ideas.

For anyone that wonders why I don't get on FTE very often, it's posts like this that keep me away. Somehow I always seem to be doing something wrong in the eyes of someone here. Today I'm a copycat and apparently a retard for getting screwed with regard to our new company name. Thanks for making me feel welcome.
 
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2011 | 02:12 PM
  #28  
puller45's Avatar
puller45
Senior User
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
From: Central Washington State
Club FTE Gold Member
A few years back, I bought a snowblower from Sears, It was, obviously, Craftsman branded. Wanting to know if I got a good deal, I started checking out other snowblowers whenever the chance arose. Over the next few months I found five different snowblowers that were painted and branded differently than my Craftsman, all well known and respected brands that were mechanically identical to it. My point is, that rebranding or reselling is not copying and is quite common and ethical in today's marketplace.
In regards to the name change hassle, non business owners do not have any way of understading the huge pain in the a$$ name changes or even address changes can be. The expense of new paper products alone, can be very expensive even for a small company like mine. Don't let the small stuff get you down Dennis, there are a lot of us out here who understand.
Incidentally, I never did figure out who really built my snowblower. Sorry if I am off topic, but oh well.
 
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2011 | 04:38 PM
  #29  
Strictly Diesel's Avatar
Strictly Diesel
FTE Sponsor
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by puller45
A few years back, I bought a snowblower from Sears, It was, obviously, Craftsman branded. Wanting to know if I got a good deal, I started checking out other snowblowers whenever the chance arose. Over the next few months I found five different snowblowers that were painted and branded differently than my Craftsman, all well known and respected brands that were mechanically identical to it. My point is, that rebranding or reselling is not copying and is quite common and ethical in today's marketplace.
Not even close to what I was referring to. I'm talking about people actually directly copying parts I've designed. I've even had someone buy the part from me under a contracting company name only to show up later as a "diesel performance shop" later with a similar part. Some people just don't care whose toes they step on as long as they get some of the pie (whether it was their share or not).

It's not "rebranding" unless the product is purchased from the same place and just gets different names/logos. I used to do that with an exhaust system I sold. I purchased the base kits, purchased options (different downpipe sizes, tips, muffler deletes, etc) and then offered a "build your own kit" setup where you could specify the parts you wanted and I'd package it and ship it. I sold it under my brand name because I was stocking all the extra parts and doing the reconfiguration. Did that until it became too much of a hassle to manage. Any way you cut it though, the original manufacturer was still getting their money.

In regards to the name change hassle, non business owners do not have any way of understading the huge pain in the a$$ name changes or even address changes can be. The expense of new paper products alone, can be very expensive even for a small company like mine. Don't let the small stuff get you down Dennis, there are a lot of us out here who understand.
Thanks! The word "nightmare" comes to mind!
 
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2011 | 05:39 PM
  #30  
JOHN2001's Avatar
JOHN2001
Logistics Pro
10 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 4,738
Likes: 15
From: Temperance, MI
ITP Boost innihalator comes pre-set at 22psi, and they claim that you should not change the adjustment unless absolutely necessary. i have a question also... i bought the ITP innh. thinking that i would need it with my dp-tuner and i think its usless to me because i still only hit 17psi max at WOt with the Dp anyways, is this normal? i thought i should be making more boost than factory.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:08 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-1
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-3
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-4
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-5
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-7
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE