Notices
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Dentsides Ford Truck
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Moser

mercury 390?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 10, 2008 | 08:37 PM
  #1  
crescentwrencher's Avatar
crescentwrencher
Thread Starter
|
Elder User
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
From: fallbrook ca.
mercury 390?

ok, ive got a 75 f250, its a 390 with merc valve covers on it, now my question is why would someone replace stock valve covers with mercury ones. so i was wondering, how can i tel if i have mercury 390????
 
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2008 | 08:39 PM
  #2  
fdude64's Avatar
fdude64
Posting Guru
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,184
Likes: 0
From: dayton ohio
wonder if there is a difference between ford and merc. other than cosmetic?
 
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2008 | 08:45 PM
  #3  
crescentwrencher's Avatar
crescentwrencher
Thread Starter
|
Elder User
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
From: fallbrook ca.
higher compression, more hp

stock truck 390 with 4bbl rated at 200hp, stock merc 390 with 4bbl rated at 315hp
 
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2008 | 08:49 PM
  #4  
fdude64's Avatar
fdude64
Posting Guru
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,184
Likes: 0
From: dayton ohio
wow wonder if the same is true for the 460s i think mine is a lincoln motor (or atleast that is what i have been getting parts for)
 
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2008 | 08:52 PM
  #5  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 785
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by crescentwrencher
ok, ive got a 75 f250, its a 390 with merc valve covers on it, now my question is why would someone replace stock valve covers with mercury ones. so i was wondering, how can i tel if i have mercury 390????
A Mercury 390 is the exact same engine as a 390 installed in a Ford.

There's absolutely no difference in the compression ratio = none. Every part on and in the engine is the same as a 390 used in a Ford.

Why do the covers say Mercury on them? Mebbe the engine was swapped in from a Mercury passenger car.

And...just because the valve covers say Mercury on them, that proves nothing about the engine size.

The first use of the Mercury name on valve covers (that have oil cap holes in them) was in 1967, and that year Mercury's could be had with 390, 410 or 428 FE engines.

So, what size is the engine? It could be any of those I listed above, it also could be a 352!

You can't go by names on valve covers to ID the size of the engine. A 390 valve cover fits any FE engine: 332/352/360/361-1958 Edsel only/390/406/410/427/428.

Whatizit? Measure the stroke: 352/360 = 3.50" / 390 = 3.78" / 410/428 = 3.98." That'll narrow it down a bit.

btw: You also cannot go by casting numbers on engine blocks, because all the 352/360/390/410/428's when first cast are 352's.

Only when the blocks are bored and/or stroked, can it be something other than a 352.
 
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2008 | 10:44 PM
  #6  
crescentwrencher's Avatar
crescentwrencher
Thread Starter
|
Elder User
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
From: fallbrook ca.
i checked the stroke and came near 4in., but im gonna run another test tommorrow to make sure.
 
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2008 | 11:00 PM
  #7  
crescentwrencher's Avatar
crescentwrencher
Thread Starter
|
Elder User
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
From: fallbrook ca.
"A Mercury 390 is the exact same engine as a 390 installed in a Ford."

i was a little off in my hp ratings, but not all 390s are the same. the only truck 390 listed has 201hp, its only a 2v but still, i guess both fords and mercs varied in hp and compression, the truck has significantly lower compression than the others


2V
8.9:1 — 250 hp (187 kW) at 4400 rpm and 378 ft·lbf (513 N·m) at 2400 rpm
1963-1965 Mercury
9.4:1 — 266 hp (198 kW) at 4600 rpm and 378 ft·lbf (513 N·m) at 2400 rpm
1964-1965 Mercury
9.5:1 — 275 hp (205 kW) at 4400 rpm and 401 ft·lbf (544 N·m) at 2600 rpm
1966 Ford
1966 Ford Fairlane
1966 Mercury
1966 Mercury Comet
9.5:1 — 270 hp (201 kW) at 4400 rpm and 401 ft·lbf (544 N·m) at 2600 rpm
1967 Ford
1967-1968 Ford Fairlane
1967 Mercury
1967 Mercury Comet
1968 Ford Mustang
1968 Mercury Cyclone GT
1968 Mercury Cougar GT
10.5:1 — 280 hp (209 kW) at 4600 rpm and 427 ft·lbf (579 N·m) at 2800 rpm
1968 Ford
1969 Mercury
9.5:1 — 265 hp (198 kW) at 4400 rpm and 401 ft·lbf (544 N·m) at 2600 rpm
1968 Ford Fairlane
1968 Ford Torino
1968-1970 Ford
1968-1970 Mercury
8.6:1 — 255 hp (190 kW) at 4400 rpm and 376 ft·lbf (510 N·m) at 2600 rpm
1968-1971 Trucks
9:1 — 255 hp (190 kW) at 4400 rpm and 376 ft·lbf (510 N·m) at 2600 rpm
1971 Ford, Mercury
8.6:1 — 201 hp (150 kW) net (150 kW) at 4000 rpm and 376 ft·lbf (510 N·m) net (510 N·m) at 2600 rpm
1972-1975 Trucks
4V
10.6:1 — 375 hp (280 kW) at 6000 rpm and 427 ft·lbf (579 N·m) at 3400 rpm
1961-1962 Ford
9.6:1 — 300 hp (224 kW) at 4600 rpm and 427 ft·lbf (579 N·m) at 2800 rpm
1961-1963 Ford
1961-1963 Ford Thunderbird
1963 Mercury
9.6:1 — 330 hp (246 kW) at 5000 rpm and 427 ft·lbf (579 N·m) at 3200 rpm
1961-1963 Ford Police Interceptor
1963 Mercury Police Interceptor
10.1:1 — 330 hp (246 kW) at 5000 rpm and 427 ft·lbf (579 N·m) at 3200 rpm
1964 Ford Police Interceptor
1964 Mercury Police Interceptor
11:1 — 300 hp (224 kW) at 4600 rpm and 427 ft·lbf (579 N·m) at 2800 rpm
1964-1965 Ford
1964-1965 Mercury
1964-1965 Ford Thunderbird
10.5:1 — 315 hp (235 kW) at 4600 rpm and 427 ft·lbf (579 N·m) at 2800 rpm
1966-1967 Ford
1966-1968 Ford Thunderbird
1968 Mercury
10.5:1 — 335 hp (251 kW) at 4600 rpm and 427 ft·lbf (579 N·m) at 3200 rpm
1967, 1969 Ford Mustang
1967, 1969 Ford Fairlane
1967, 1969 Mercury Cyclone GT
1967, 1969 Mercury Cougar GT
1969 Ford Torino
1969 Mercury Montego
10.5:1 — 325 hp (242 kW) at 4800 rpm and 427 ft·lbf (579 N·m) at 2800 rpm
3x2V, 10.6:1
401 hp (299 kW) at 6000 rpm and 430 ft·lbf (583 N·m) at 3500 rpm
1961-1962 Ford
340 hp (254 kW) at 6000 rpm and 430 ft·lbf (583 N·m) at 3500 rpm
1962 Ford
1962 Ford Thunderbird
 
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2008 | 11:18 PM
  #8  
four4x4fords's Avatar
four4x4fords
Mountain Pass
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 236
Likes: 18
Way back in the day I bought a 62 F-100 4X4 from a guy who said it had a Mercury 390 in it. That truck was scary fast. A bit too fast for a me at 20 yrs old,which led to it being flipped and totaled.I pulled the motor and put it away for about 15 years. It was not until I disassembled it to rebuild for my 76 that I learned it was 428 CJ......
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-2

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-5

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-7

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-8

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Apr 11, 2008 | 06:04 AM
  #9  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 785
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by crescentwrencher
"A Mercury 390 is the exact same engine as a 390 installed in a Ford."

i was a little off in my hp ratings, but not all 390s are the same.
I didn't say all 390's were the same, what I said was that the 390's installed in Merc's were the same as installed in Fords.

I have all the specs of every 390 car engine made from 1961 thru 1971.

I currently own two 1963 Galaxies, and have owned over 20 1962/64 Galaxies.

A few of my sources:

The Standard Catalog of American Cars 1946-1975.

Fords of the Sixties.

High Performance Mercury's.

Ford Galaxie/LTD 1960/1976.

All the Motor Trend mags from the 1960's.
 
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2008 | 12:57 PM
  #10  
crescentwrencher's Avatar
crescentwrencher
Thread Starter
|
Elder User
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
From: fallbrook ca.
ok, its confirmed. its either a 410 or a 428, good thing you guys told me to check the stroke.

is there anyway to see if i have a 410 or a 428? shouldnt i beable to tell through the head numbers?
 
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2008 | 01:22 PM
  #11  
Mil1ion's Avatar
Mil1ion
New User
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 0
Likes: 24
Post all the numbers you know

Crank
Heads
Pistons
 
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2008 | 02:25 PM
  #12  
Bullitt390's Avatar
Bullitt390
Certified Thread Hijacker
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 14,441
Likes: 60
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by NumberDummy
Whatizit? Measure the stroke: 352/360 = 3.50" / 390 = 3.78" / 410/428 = 3.98." That'll narrow it down a bit.

btw: You also cannot go by casting numbers on engine blocks, because all the 352/360/390/410/428's when first cast are 352's.

Only when the blocks are bored and/or stroked, can it be something other than a 352.
That isn't entirely true... the 428 blocks have thicker cylinder walls for the increased bore.

Also look into the water jacket thru the freeze plug. Yep, 428 is cast inside there.

428 Cobra Jet Block Identification
 
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2008 | 04:20 PM
  #13  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 785
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by crescentwrencher
is there anyway to see if i have a 410 or a 428? shouldnt i be able to tell through the head numbers?
Nope.

C6AZ-6049-E .. Cylinder Head

Fits: 1966/67 352/390/410/428.
 
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2008 | 05:22 PM
  #14  
crescentwrencher's Avatar
crescentwrencher
Thread Starter
|
Elder User
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
From: fallbrook ca.
so in other words ive got to take the engine apart to tell?

the only casting numbers i can get to are the heads and block

if it is a 410, can i bore it to a 428?
 
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2008 | 08:46 PM
  #15  
Bullitt390's Avatar
Bullitt390
Certified Thread Hijacker
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 14,441
Likes: 60
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by NumberDummy
Nope.

C6AZ-6049-E .. Cylinder Head

Fits: 1966/67 352/390/410/428.
That is the head ASSEMBLY number not a real casting number... more than likely it had a C6AE-R casting number
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:31 PM.

story-0
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-2
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-4
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-6
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-7
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-8
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE