When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I've often wondered what would happen if you cross referenced some engine parts catalogs and threw a set of competion/HD rods & pistons, a little milling hear & there, Meebey' offset grinding the crank, relocating the pins higher for just a tad more stroke?
Bigger valves & a full on portjob with multi angle valve job? Custom cam, of course.
And if you wanted to go further:
Sheetmetal intake or extrude-hone the factory piece. Adapt a bigger T-Body, Bigger injectors?
Of course I've always thought these engines just scream for someone to put a turbo on.
Take up the slack in the motor mounts by chaining the left side of the motor to the frame-so the motor wont move. (hardened steel links)
-you'll send more torque out to the rear.
I gotta 94 with 46,000 miles and got the 2-into-1 intake boot from a V-8 truck, and added a piece of pipe and a clamp on filter in place of the stock box. I also removed the smog pump, the second cat, and poked out the first one and run a single inlet, dual outlet flowmaster (pretty quiet) and noticed a decent improvement, but nothing to make it any more "thrilling".....And the mileage seemed to improve, to boot.
I think next I'm gonna smooth out the butterflies and shaft in the throttle body and add a spacer.
And there is a lengthy, detailed thread in the supercharger/turbocharger/nitrious section of FTE where a guy built a turbocharged 300. It's a good read even if one isn't going to copy the concept.
Originally Posted by Scndsin
I've often wondered what would happen if you cross referenced some engine parts catalogs and threw a set of competion/HD rods & pistons, a little milling hear & there, Meebey' offset grinding the crank, relocating the pins higher for just a tad more stroke?
I would imagine as with most engines, you'd limit your RPMs a bit but have more torque in the lower RPMs. Since the 300 isn't a screamer anyway, I don't see how this would be bad conceptionally in any way. To me the 300 behaves much like a big block - large bores, heavy rods, decent stroke as starting material. Just two less cylinders.
To me the 300 behaves much like a big block - large bores, heavy rods, decent stroke as starting material. Just two less cylinders.
Thats pretty much how I see it. You don't have to spin a 385 series to the moon to get good power & torque.
I know the big six is not rev-happy, but I've often wondered how it would respond to a good blue-print & some quality light weight/HD internals. Add a few more traditional Hotrodding techniques & it should be surprising.