Fitch fuel catalyst
no worry's man. it would take a lot more than critical comments to ruffle my feathers. besides i can see what you mean, and i have never seen a point in getting miffed in being corrected if i was wrong in some way.
https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/7...nerator-3.html
Even though they cost a bit more, on the order of 1000 dollars for a 7.3 motor sized unit, I think that has much more potential than a fuel catalyst dumped in the fuel tank.
Last edited by Dave Sponaugle; Mar 9, 2008 at 01:22 PM.
https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/6...002-7-3-a.html
Jury's still out on wether it works or not, and some think its a violation of the laws of physics because there are some who claim to be able to run an engine on only the generator (which I do not believe). But if propane can work as a fuel catalyst for diesel, I see no reason why a mixture of hydrogen and oxygen wouldn't work at least as well.
I have a page to go yet, but I am going to post some observations at the end if they are not addressed in the next page of reading.
I see several facts that are stated, but overlooked at the same time.
After my experiments I know propane in small amounts can increase the MPG on my engine.
I also know if I figure in the cost of the propane, the increase in MPG is equal to the cost of the propane, so no savings are realized.
I also know at heavier applications of propane, more power is also possible.
But in that application the cost of the fuel and propane just increase the cost per mile to operate.
Now the big question is how much hydrogen/oxygen is needed to burn the fuel that all engines exhaust because of slow flame spread in the cylinder?
I will be building one of these shortly to see what happens.
Do they have a seperate tank of O2 and a seperate tank of H? Like the space shuttle.
From what I remember in chemistry class by adding electricity to water you can "break" apart the Hydrogen molecules from the Oxygen molecules. Doing this can be quite explosive!
Perhaps I should read the links, eh?
The auto ignition point of hydrogen is over 900F, so nothing short of a spark, or fuel chamber ignition will ignite it.
I have a feeling that the extra Oxygen is also playing a role in this situation.
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
On second thought it would be unethical even if this guy is committing highway robbery. I think I 'll do it in my shop and if nothing else give the kids a little course in chemistry....and not try to blow myself up.
So as I sat there waiting for the Alieve to kick in I was thinking about all the different things they were wanting to do in the Stroke thread.
On a turbo engine, I have figured out how to do everything they were wanting to do, but using a totally different approach.
After reading several other websites last evening the number I kept seeing as the autoingnition temp for hydrogen was close to 1100 degrees.
So it looks like the fuel will actually be igniting the hydrogen, but then the hydrogen flash should spread the flame instantly through all the fuel in the cylinder.
The oxygen would be icing on the cake for more complete combustion of the fuel.
So as I sat there waiting for the Alieve to kick in I was thinking about all the different things they were wanting to do in the Stroke thread.
On a turbo engine, I have figured out how to do everything they were wanting to do, but using a totally different approach.
After reading several other websites last evening the number I kept seeing as the autoingnition temp for hydrogen was close to 1100 degrees.
So it looks like the fuel will actually be igniting the hydrogen, but then the hydrogen flash should spread the flame instantly through all the fuel in the cylinder.
The oxygen would be icing on the cake for more complete combustion of the fuel.
I'd join in and start experimenting, but my truck is 1500 miles away right now.
Sometimes I wish I'd been a mechanic rather than an engineer so I wouldn't have to be in California just to have a job.
I know on a cool night with a light rain my rig always ran quieter, smoother and had more power pulling hills. I'm sure DaveS remembers from his trucking days, those kind of nights where the engine just sounded better and had more power.
BTW....NO it was not from anything we smoked LOL!!!!
I know on a cool night with a light rain my rig always ran quieter, smoother and had more power pulling hills. I'm sure DaveS remembers from his trucking days, those kind of nights where the engine just sounded better and had more power.
BTW....NO it was not from anything we smoked LOL!!!!
The best MPG calculations I ever got was when it was cool and damp outside (drove through mild foggy patches). The best result was in late september with a mild mist and a cold front had promptly ended summer, so the fuel grade was probably still summer blend. Cruise control was set to 70 MPH, and the truck returned 22 MPG (canuck gallons). It also seemed to burn rather clean and have a little extra power on many of the hills. Powertrain setup was 6.9 N/A, C6 tranny, 3.08 gears, and ram air intake.
Driving in the rain always cost me MPG because of increaced wind drag, and rolling resistance.




