Notices

300 I6 specs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 4, 2000 | 02:00 PM
  #1  
lambo's Avatar
lambo
Thread Starter
|
New User
25 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
300 I6 specs

Can anyone tell me the hp and torque specs for the early 90's 4.9L engine?? (i'm looking at a 93 right now)
Anyone have any comments on how it compares to the 302 V8?
 
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2000 | 06:10 AM
  #2  
TallPaul's Avatar
TallPaul
Post Fiend
25 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 5,860
Likes: 4
From: Metro Detroit (Redford)
300 I6 specs

This is out of a Chilton Ford Pickup Truck manual:

for 1988 through 1993 (and probably also through 1996 but this manual only went through 93):

4.9 I6 rated 150 hp @ 3400 and 265 torque @ 2000
5.0 V8 rated 170 hp @ 3800 and 275 torque @ 2800

I prefer the 4.9 (have had 4.9s since '77) over the 5.0 for trucks and Moses Ludel who wrote the Ford F Series Pickup Owner's Bible says the 4.9 is a better hauler under load and he would only have the 5.0 in a pickup if it was a commuter truck with no significant hauling. (The 5.0 actually is a 4.9 V8 if you round the cc's off correctly).
 
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2000 | 06:43 PM
  #3  
F10067weber's Avatar
F10067weber
New User
25 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
300 I6 specs

 
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2009 | 04:02 PM
  #4  
FElover's Avatar
FElover
New User
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
For a pickup I'd recommend the 300ci(4.9l) inline 6. It is very reliable, and you get you power at lower rpm, which is best for hauling. The straight 300 six is tough and will last longer than the 5 liter in a pickup if taken care of. It even has comparable fuel mileage when compared to the 5.0l in a same sized vehicle with same transmission.
 
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2009 | 06:29 PM
  #5  
Gramps86's Avatar
Gramps86
Senior User
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 214
Likes: 1
agreed, the 300 is tough as nails, the only thing you dont get with it is that nice v8 sound....but then who wants to sound like everybody else :P
 
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2009 | 07:25 PM
  #6  
Ford_Six's Avatar
Ford_Six
Hotshot
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 18,488
Likes: 22
From: The Big, Oregon
Club FTE Gold Member
We really need a "worlds oldest thread" smiley. I would use it here-
 
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2009 | 07:56 PM
  #7  
Gramps86's Avatar
Gramps86
Senior User
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 214
Likes: 1
holy crap i didnt even realize i replied to somebody bringing the dead to life lol
 
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2009 | 09:27 PM
  #8  
rikard's Avatar
rikard
Posting Guru
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,208
Likes: 2
From: North Reading Mass
I've had both engines in F150s and agree that the 300 is a better hauler and requires less attention than the 302. If you feel the need for speed or want to modify the engine the 302 would be a better choice.
My EFI 300 has been an excellent engine but i miss the sound of a carbed 302 as it passes 3500 rpm.
A lot of people knock the 302, but the ones I've had were pretty dependable with one making it to 220k. All of them had plenty of power especially when compared to engines of similar displacement.
My current 300 has 193k on it and it does not burn or leak oil. I use it every day and it hauls my 4100lb fiver with little complaint. Most old farts like me like their V8s but the EFI 300 and the AMC EFI 4.0 proved that a six in a row can go.
YMMV
regards
rikard
 
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2009 | 06:13 PM
  #9  
Harte3's Avatar
Harte3
Postmaster
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,603
Likes: 10
From: Spokane, WA
This is great...it shows someone is at least reading past postings...and that's a good thing.
 
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2023 | 11:38 PM
  #10  
BOBWhite12's Avatar
BOBWhite12
Trailering
Joined: Mar 2023
Posts: 24
Likes: 1
Wow almost 23 year's old! The 300 vs 302 debate might just be the most dividing topic I've seen in the ford truck world. These guys could have gone to a dealership and picked one up almost brand new back in 2000 and were still taking about it today.
 
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2025 | 09:55 AM
  #11  
pleH420's Avatar
pleH420
Trailering
Liked
Joined: Oct 2022
Posts: 15
Likes: 11
Originally Posted by BOBWhite12
Wow almost 23 year's old! The 300 vs 302 debate might just be the most dividing topic I've seen in the ford truck world. These guys could have gone to a dealership and picked one up almost brand new back in 2000 and were still taking about it today.
Got my first one in a van today, had a few in trucks. Working on this thing in a van should be interesting. I had both, 5.0 is for cars... The debate continues!
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
WNDOPDLR
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
1
Aug 3, 2014 10:31 AM
pkthomas
Crossovers
1
Apr 23, 2014 09:15 PM
r___r
1999 - 2016 Super Duty
4
Dec 15, 2013 06:11 PM
C.W
Modular V10 (6.8l)
2
Mar 26, 2013 09:13 PM
hammerdn
335 Series- 5.8/351M, 6.6/400, 351 Cleveland
2
Jun 17, 2005 02:05 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:47 PM.