Fan clutch thread?
the taurus fan is a power sucking pig. I have heard from anywhere between 50-70 amps and in some cases up to a 100,
Once again, "soleniods are desiged" to do work, as in a starter solenoid that engages the starter gear. Relays are the devices you once referred to as "simply an electronic switch". You can not substitute a FORD starter relay for a FORD starter solenoid-they're 2 entirely different devices.
At this late date, xtrford is still making wild guesses about the power used by a "taurus fan" as his basis to convert to an e-fan, instead of taking my sound advice & simply noting the size fuse FORD used to protect the Taurus fan circuit. Others should not ignore the fact that the fan could not use more amps than the fuse rating FORD selected. Its OK for xtrford to add that good advice to his "official ignore list" & go right on guessing in the "50-70 amps and in some cases up to a 100" range though. However, I'm w/tim.moman & seriously doubt the Taurus fan ever draws even 30 amps. There's a 30 amp 'cooling fan' fuse in my car & it has dual fans.
Good luck using "these soleniods are desiged for electric golf cart applications". Every electric golf cart I've ever seen has a tray full of batteries to power it's heavy traction motor. How "these soleniods" application relates to an itty bitty, fist size, Taurus cooling fan running on a single battery should be amusing.
Out of respect for xtrford's feelings, I'll remain silent on shroud issues.
Last edited by ranger88a; Nov 1, 2007 at 11:23 AM.
Good plan on starting lower fused. But engineering may be a bit off. If the fan is rated at 30a. Fusing at 65% of the load (20a) will blow. And 50a could exceed the “melt” value for 10g wire. (Reason for the main fuse). May I suggest fusing the main power feed a bit lower? 40% above max load value is more than needed try 35 or 40 amp fuses to start. You can always up the fuse if it does blow as planned. Or go to 8g on the main feed. (overkill for that 30a fan)
Am I mis-understanding on "switching" fuse. Are running a separate feed just for control? If so it should not need but 5a. I never extend above 10a for control. The relays take less than .5 amps to hold usually so 10 is EXCESSIVE. (Been a while since I looked at one). So it sounds like you are going the starter relay option. Something to keep in mind is efficiency. Installing the e-fans are to improve that, then run a control circuit to eat up gains in with alternator demand seems counter productive to your goal. Why are you concerned with running a 30 amp load with a 40 amp switch device???? You might look at what the factory uses in the original vehicle for the fan relay.
And Club Wagon, I am with you on the shroud subject. It is the reason I have not done this to mine.
Good plan on starting lower fused. But engineering may be a bit off. If the fan is rated at 30a. Fusing at 65% of the load (20a) will blow. And 50a could exceed the “melt” value for 10g wire. (Reason for the main fuse). May I suggest fusing the main power feed a bit lower? 40% above max load value is more than needed try 35 or 40 amp fuses to start. You can always up the fuse if it does blow as planned. Or go to 8g on the main feed. (overkill for that 30a fan)
Am I mis-understanding on "switching" fuse. Are running a separate feed just for control? If so it should not need but 5a. I never extend above 10a for control. The relays take less than .5 amps to hold usually so 10 is EXCESSIVE. (Been a while since I looked at one). So it sounds like you are going the starter relay option. Something to keep in mind is efficiency. Installing the e-fans are to improve that, then run a control circuit to eat up gains in with alternator demand seems counter productive to your goal. Why are you concerned with running a 30 amp load with a 40 amp switch device???? You might look at what the factory uses in the original vehicle for the fan relay.
The solenoids will have there own seperate 12V source feed from the battery which I plan on using 8g wire and unfortunately as for a weather proof fuse holder, it is the highest I can find. I am still finding alot of different opinions on the net regarding taurus fan applications on different vehicles and the amp spike at start-up has been documented and even measured with a fluke meter. Many have claimed of blowing out several 30 amp relays and that is why I am taking the route I'm going. These fans will pull alot to get going at first and then level off, so I still don't see anything wrong with the parts I have considering I am not using the oem set-up. But I'm still curious about the need of a diode, maybe another route I might have to take and it sounds like a good idea.
On another note, I think attaching the shroud + fan to my stock one is the way to go. I plan on shaping the taurus fan shroud to fit in mine since it covers the whole rad and not just one small area.
Last edited by xtrford; Nov 1, 2007 at 09:38 PM.
I have heard from anywhere between 50-70 amps and in some cases up to a 100
I am still finding alot of different opinions on the net regarding taurus fan applications on different vehicles and the amp spike at start-up has been documented and even measured with a fluke meter. Many have claimed of blowing out several 30 amp relays and that is why I am taking the route I'm going.
these soleniods are desiged for electric golf cart applications
PS: Since the institution of the "official ignore list" I guess its OK to comment on the shroud for others. Hint: If your original fan shroud is like the 1 in my '98, you'll find FORD did a very good thing by designing it to R&R easily. FORD expects mechanics to quickly/easily remove the fan by the 'Big Nut' & the shroud, when service to components at front of motor is needed. Only 2 small screws really hold the shroud in place, the 2 bottom pegs merely slip into slots on either side. Its also flexible enough to wrestle out w/o draining coolant & removing hose-contrary to "hanyes". However, it was not designed to support an e-fan & would require modifications to sustain the load, which would most likely make it harder to remove.
The e-fan techs I've spoken to don't seem to have reservations about placing 'pusher' fans into the cavernous empty space behind the grille. Which is the way I'm leaning. A pair of smaller fans, 1 on either side of the big post blocking the center, feels right to me. Conversely, a big single fan, directly behind that wide post, seems like a bad seat at the concert. I have no qualms about powering a pair of e-fans. Also want to eliminate the shroud & open up access to the front of the motor. I've had nearly a dozen vehicles with dual e-fans & the only problem I ever had w/e-fans was from broken frames after a drunk in a pickup backed up w/o looking & crunched to the radiator support.
The only problem I ran into was putting the shroud back on the rad because the taurus fan was attached to the stock opening and it almost made it too ridgid to bend the tabs past the rad hose on the passenger side. I had to disassemble the entire intake to be able to maneuver it back in place.
The final tab on the whole project ran me about $150, the most expensive part was the fan which costed me $40 from the junkyard.
Here's a pic of the whole assembly from my gallery.
Last edited by xtrford; Nov 3, 2007 at 10:28 AM.
CAUTION! ignore this part, WARNING! ribbing ahead, ask children & those of tender dispositions to leave the room: With a "power sucking pig" for an e-fan, "soleniods desiged for electric golf cart applications", "all conects soldered" & "shaping the taurus fan shroud to fit in" your F's shroud, what could possibly go wrong? If there's any glitches you can always go "to the trusty recip saw to finish the job".
PS: Since the institution of the "official ignore list" I guess its OK to comment on the shroud for others. Hint: If your original fan shroud is like the 1 in my '98, you'll find FORD did a very good thing by designing it to R&R easily. FORD expects mechanics to quickly/easily remove the fan by the 'Big Nut' & the shroud, when service to components at front of motor is needed. Only 2 small screws really hold the shroud in place, the 2 bottom pegs merely slip into slots on either side. Its also flexible enough to wrestle out w/o draining coolant & removing hose-contrary to "hanyes". However, it was not designed to support an e-fan & would require modifications to sustain the load, which would most likely make it harder to remove.
The e-fan techs I've spoken to don't seem to have reservations about placing 'pusher' fans into the cavernous empty space behind the grille. Which is the way I'm leaning. A pair of smaller fans, 1 on either side of the big post blocking the center, feels right to me. Conversely, a big single fan, directly behind that wide post, seems like a bad seat at the concert. I have no qualms about powering a pair of e-fans. Also want to eliminate the shroud & open up access to the front of the motor. I've had nearly a dozen vehicles with dual e-fans & the only problem I ever had w/e-fans was from broken frames after a drunk in a pickup backed up w/o looking & crunched to the radiator support.
I bought my solenoids from with the referral of my friends to an alterator repair shop and he gave me products that are actually used for oem applications. With his advice which I will take any friggin day over your dumb lambasting posts told me they will only take what is required by the fans and it is a good idea since the Taurus fan in the actual car is controlled by the PCM and not aftermarket mechanical devices.
You blab about Ford's wise designing yet you take the completely opposite route. Are you getting confused as to what your haynes manual suggests? Do you know why Ford put the fan behind the rad with a shroud? Why would want to impede airflow through the front of your rad? Pusher fans are about 20% less effecient than pullers, so by that logic you will need roughly 2 pushers to do the work of one puller. Your alternator only produces max amperage at about 4-5 rpms, NOT at idle which is where your fans will be engaging most of the time. Your less effecient ways will only spell the demise of your alternator....but I really don't give a s**t what you do.
BTW...your are going to have one butt ugly looking front end of your truck with 2 Ford taurus fans there. It will look like you blinged it up from an Autozone store.
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Your alternator only produces max amperage at about 4-5 rpms, NOT at idle
BTW...your are going to have one butt ugly looking front end of your truck with 2 Ford taurus fans there.
IMO this extra/excess cooling capacity, only provided by dual fans, is potentially a very good thing to have in FL. IMO your Taurus e-fan graft may have constricted "about 20%" of the shroud's throat, possibly reducing maximum cooling capacity. I also sincerely hope you did not ignore my comments about the shroud not being designed to support an e-fan & made some attempt to reinforce & secure things.
BTW..."your are" apparently unfamiliar with the design of F150 grille & unaware of the large empty space behind it & ahead of the radiator & radiator support. To even look at the pusher fans I'm considering you'd need to get on your knees, use a flashlight & get your eyes near the grille, just to get a peek inside. Both the rectangular 2X4 proportions & big center post, of the radiator cut out, scream dual fans-they'd virtually cover the core! So close to the Arctic Circle, you don't really even need a fan most of the time anyway. There was a time I took my fans off in winter to help heat up the interior. From NY, my 4X4 has a block heater, that's what snow belters need! Preheating your motor can save of lot of low temp enrichment & battery draw.
Readers should note that xtrford's characterization; "one butt ugly looking front end" in this case refers to a 100% original '98 XLT 4X4, that will turn 10K this week & is still very nearly exactly as "butt ugly" as the day FORD hatched it.
PS: One of the links is to 'Flex-a-lite' that claims gains as much as "17 HP" & "2-3 MPG" from converting a belt driven fan to dual 15" e-fans.



