New Pics in gallery
#1
#3
#4
#6
Rusty, looking good! How much offset did you end up with the engine? It looks like just over 1 inch to clear the block huggers. Your gallery indicates that the motor is a 350 TPI. That should be a great combo with the 700R4. Are the heads Vortec heads? I went the carb route with vortec heads but the TPI setup should make it run super smooth and probably provide better mileage. I am set up with a 9 inch with a 3.70 with a 700R4. What is the ratio on your jag rear? Someday we should compare mileage results. Several years away for me since I do my own body and paint work and I am slow.
Last edited by 49willard; 10-28-2007 at 07:51 AM.
#7
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Comox Valley, Canada
Posts: 2,415
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Looks good.......and it is so "dark"
Pretty tight clearances on the dizzy to firewall and header collector flange to steering box.....or is it just the pics that make it look like that?
Ooooohhh I know I know....... fab some "Power By Ford" valve covers to fit and you may fool a few of the "lightside" people LOLOLOLOLOL
Pretty tight clearances on the dizzy to firewall and header collector flange to steering box.....or is it just the pics that make it look like that?
Ooooohhh I know I know....... fab some "Power By Ford" valve covers to fit and you may fool a few of the "lightside" people LOLOLOLOLOL
Trending Topics
#10
49willard It is 1inch to the pass side. The collector pipe below the bolts on the headers will be pie cut to the engine side bent and welded back. to give me about an inch more clearence on the steering box. Randy Jack I put some more pics of the motor mounts in the gallery. For some reason after the first 4 or so you have to go back and click on the last 3. Don't know what happened. sparky I'll have to think about the valve covers. It's a thought.
#11
#13
Rusty -
That motor mount looks weenie to me. You just have the bolt tube welded to the end of the rectangular tube? I would have preferred the bolt tube go thru a hole in the rectangular tube, then get welded around it to the rectangular tube. That would put parent metal into work. Welds can be brittle and crack, especially under that kind of vibration and torque loading.
I don't want to bum you out, but I would think about redoing that.
That motor mount looks weenie to me. You just have the bolt tube welded to the end of the rectangular tube? I would have preferred the bolt tube go thru a hole in the rectangular tube, then get welded around it to the rectangular tube. That would put parent metal into work. Welds can be brittle and crack, especially under that kind of vibration and torque loading.
I don't want to bum you out, but I would think about redoing that.
#14
Originally Posted by Randy Jack
Rusty -
That motor mount looks weenie to me. You just have the bolt tube welded to the end of the rectangular tube? I would have preferred the bolt tube go thru a hole in the rectangular tube, then get welded around it to the rectangular tube. That would put parent metal into work. Welds can be brittle and crack, especially under that kind of vibration and torque loading.
I don't want to bum you out, but I would think about redoing that.
That motor mount looks weenie to me. You just have the bolt tube welded to the end of the rectangular tube? I would have preferred the bolt tube go thru a hole in the rectangular tube, then get welded around it to the rectangular tube. That would put parent metal into work. Welds can be brittle and crack, especially under that kind of vibration and torque loading.
I don't want to bum you out, but I would think about redoing that.