Notices

another STROKER thread 427 0r 443

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 6, 2001 | 09:18 PM
  #1  
grump's Avatar
grump
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
another STROKER thread 427 0r 443

I am going to build a stroker w/ a 390 block. I was crusin thru the web, and went to www.dscmotorsport.com. I have the Block but I was looking for a 390 crank, They have a 390 crankshaft offset ground for a chrys. rod that gets 4.05 stroke.
Would that make some power w/ good cast iron heads? A place in Oklahoma City near me has a 390 GT intake for 2 4's for 2 1/2 Bills. This is for a street rod, and bracket racing ? Any experience w/ this combo?
 
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2001 | 10:32 PM
  #2  
dinosaurfan's Avatar
dinosaurfan
Cargo Master
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,931
Likes: 12
From: SW Michigan
another STROKER thread 427 0r 443

grumpMark, sounds like you're headed in the right direction. What does this combo use for pistons ? The 390 stroker engines (410 merc and clones) make 425 - 450 horses and more than 500 lbsft of torque without any trouble if they can breath. I would run a pair of heads with 2.09/1.65 as a minimum. I'm looking into whether or not even bigger valves are cost effective. But I am certain you will want better than stock 390 size (2.04/1.55?) Don't worry about finding special heads, put the 2.09/1.65 combo in a pair of C8AE-Hs or D2TE-AAs and you will be fine. If you mean the C7ZX manifold for twin 4s, they are great. You get the eyewash of twin carbs but still have dual plane driveablity. If you plan on running Holley carbs they will be somewhat time consuming to set up the floats and idle mixtures and the linkage takes some sorting out. If you can live with a sinlge 4 barrel, the blue thunder intakes are really nice. DF
 
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2001 | 09:13 AM
  #3  
grump's Avatar
grump
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
another STROKER thread 427 0r 443

I called about the intake and it is an S code 390 gt cast iron intake C7AE9425-E w/ single 4BBL. I have the C8AE-H Heads and a 360 block from a 69 truck. I need to buy a crank and rods anyway. Buying a 390 crank, and having it offset ground seems like the cheapest way to go. I figured on boring the block out, and finding the pistons then. I've read threads here about machineing off the top of pistons to obtain close to 0 deck height, I'll haved to get advice on that.
I want it to breath, will the intake,and the heads I have be workable with some extra work on the heads? Plus I found some adjustable rockers, will that help me w/ my Cam choice.
 
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2001 | 09:14 AM
  #4  
karlsd's Avatar
karlsd
Elder User
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 962
Likes: 2
From: Collierville, TN
another STROKER thread 427 0r 443

How long are those Chrysler rods, and what would you be using for pistons? I'm building a 410 right now (360/390 block with a 3.98" stroke 428 crank), and the biggest challenge I've had is finding ways to keep the compression ratio down. I'm using the C8AE-H heads that DF recommended to you, and they only have 69 cc of volume. Using standard 390 pistons would have given me a static CR of 11.5:1 (.030 over with a .041 gasket). I'm using shorter, dished pistons to get the CR down to 9.5:1. Unless the Chrysler rods or your pistons are substantially shorter than the 6.488" rods and pistons from a 390/410/428, I'd think you would have even bigger CR issues to deal with, and going with a shorter rod increases rod angularity (never a good thing) and the possibility of clearance problems.

All that said, I've never tried it. Obviously someone else has, or they wouldn't be selling that setup. Ask them about their experience. And then you go try it and tell the rest of us how it goes!

karlsd a/k/a "ksd"
69 F100 Explorer 360/C6
 
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2001 | 09:27 AM
  #5  
grump's Avatar
grump
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
another STROKER thread 427 0r 443

Name: 390 Ford 443" Stroker
Description: Offset Ground to use Chrysler Rod at 4.02" stroke for 427 or 443 CID Stroker
Price: $375.00 / each


This is a paste of the part description. The exact rod isn't mentioned, but I'd haved to find out from them or my machinist.But for the money, that's alot of HP, and CI. That's what so good about the F.E.





1969 Ford Ranger LWB w/ C/6, 360 rebuilt with help from here


 
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2001 | 11:32 AM
  #6  
karlsd's Avatar
karlsd
Elder User
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 962
Likes: 2
From: Collierville, TN
another STROKER thread 427 0r 443

I recently bought a .010/.010 1U 428 crank (3.98" stroke) for $200. Besides being about half the price of that offset ground crank, it uses standard and plentiful 390 rods. You'll need to pay $375 for the crank, plus buy special rods, all for only 4 or so addition cubes. Doesn't sound like a real good deal to me. I'd just put in a 428 crank and be done with it.

karlsd a/k/a "ksd"
69 F100 Explorer 360/C6
 
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2001 | 01:32 PM
  #7  
Ratsmoker's Avatar
Ratsmoker
Post Fiend
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,624
Likes: 8
From: Missouri
another STROKER thread 427 0r 443

Karlsd, Autozone sells pistons for a 76 390 for about 100 bucks. These are actually 410 pistons. Don't know what that will give you for C.R. but it should be better.
 
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2001 | 04:00 PM
  #8  
karlsd's Avatar
karlsd
Elder User
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 962
Likes: 2
From: Collierville, TN
another STROKER thread 427 0r 443

Thanks, but I already bought a set. They are probably the same thing. They are Sterling 390 truck pistons, which are somewhat shorter than 390 car pistons and have a .097" dish. I paid a little over a hundred bucks for them. My calculated CR is now about 9.5:1, which I think I can live with. Once I get it all together and installed, I'll see how she runs. If absolutely necessary, I can always pull the heads and polish or open up the chambers a little more.

karlsd a/k/a "ksd"
69 F100 Explorer 360/C6
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Nov 7, 2001 | 06:01 PM
  #9  
Charles-65F350's Avatar
Charles-65F350
Senior User
25 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
From: Ozarks
another STROKER thread 427 0r 443

They are Sterling 390 truck pistons, which are somewhat shorter than 390 car pistons and have a .097" dish. I paid a little over a hundred bucks for them. My calculated CR is now about 9.5:1, which I think I can live with
I just bought the same set, .030 over, from Summit for $114. I'm building a 390 using a stock 390 crank and rods which should result in a low CR around 8:1. (I have a short duration Crane 260-2H dual pattern cam and plan to haul/tow on 87 octane). They'll be far enough down the hole that the quench won't be effective and I was wondering if I wouldn't have more detonation resistance at 9.5:1 with quench. What head cc did you calculate 9.5 at? I have to measure mine someday. Seems like 9.5 would require at least 89 octane...


 
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2001 | 06:21 PM
  #10  
FEina52F1's Avatar
FEina52F1
Senior User
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
From: Oztralia
another STROKER thread 427 0r 443

The mopar rods are from a slant 225
They are ~6.7 long, 2.1875 big end bearing
They take CHEV piston-pins
400 chev piston is best if you can bore the block that far






remember:-

In OZ and seeking 427block /428crank
 
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2001 | 08:41 AM
  #11  
karlsd's Avatar
karlsd
Elder User
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 962
Likes: 2
From: Collierville, TN
another STROKER thread 427 0r 443

I'm at about 9.5:1 with 69 cc heads and a .041" gasket.

I don't think you can possibly use 6.7" rods and a 4+" stroke in a FE. The deck height of the FE is only 10.17". A stroke of 4.02" (I also saw 4.05" above, so I don't know which it is) with rods of 6.7" would leave you only 1.36" for piston compression, height, and I'm not familiar with any that are that short. Are the chevy pistons really that short? The shortest FE piston I know of is 1.660", which would put it 0.30" ABOVE the deck at the top of the stroke.

karlsd a/k/a "ksd"
69 F100 Explorer 360/C6
 
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2001 | 11:29 AM
  #12  
grump's Avatar
grump
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
another STROKER thread 427 0r 443

I talked to my machinist this morning. He said it would fit, but the chrys. rods won't hold up w/ alot of HP. He said the 428 crank, and 390 rods was the best way to go and cheapest.
 
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2001 | 05:07 PM
  #13  
FEina52F1's Avatar
FEina52F1
Senior User
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
From: Oztralia
another STROKER thread 427 0r 443

[updated:LAST EDITED ON 12-Nov-01 AT 06:13 PM (EST)]400 chev pistons for "long" (5.7/ 6.0?) rods are very short and last time I calc'ed just right for the 6.7 rods( after a minor skim).

10.17 - 6.7 - (4.05/2) = 1.450

The 400 pistons are light but only come plus 30 4.155 1.5XX deck height

I wouldnt be so hard on the mopar rods, they are nice well finished items with a good size bolts. The old slants had a 4.125(?) stroke.
 
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2001 | 05:20 PM
  #14  
Ratsmoker's Avatar
Ratsmoker
Post Fiend
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,624
Likes: 8
From: Missouri
another STROKER thread 427 0r 443

My buddy's dad had a performance manual from dodge. Part of the procedure for breaking in a slant 6 was to drop it into first and make several 6500rpm blasts with it. That's a lot of swingin going on for a 4 1/8" stroke.
 
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2001 | 06:40 PM
  #15  
bsprowl's Avatar
bsprowl
Tuned
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
From: Deatsville, AL
another STROKER thread 427 0r 443

Yeah but the stock slant 6 piston only weights 16.4 oz compared to the 23.99 oz 390 piston.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:40 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE