Notices

Will These heads work???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 19, 2007 | 03:16 PM
  #1  
rocker_topper's Avatar
rocker_topper
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Will These heads work???

Im replacing the heads on my 4.0L OHV v-6 in my explorer and i was wandering, i have the 90TM heads and was wandering would the 98TM heads work on my truck and if so would i get any better performance out of them versus the 90TM heads on my truck now???


Cologne V-6 Cylinder Heads<TABLE border=1><TBODY><TR><TH>Head "name" <TH>intake
ports <TH>exhaust
ports <TH>Casting
Number <TH>Comments <TR><TD>2.6 <TD>3 <TD>2 <TD>70TM <TD>Used on 1972-73 US-spec Capri I 2600. Apparently, it is also used on the 2.0 liter version, and I'd guess on the 2.3 as well. Some people like to put these heads on later 2.8 engines. Some people believe that the earlier 2.6 heads flow better. The 2.6 heads make it possible to fit the Kugelfischer fuel injection system used on the Capri RS-2600. These heads will not easily fit on the later 2.8 block however, due to water passage alignment problems.

<TR><TD>Weslake <TD>3 <TD>3 <TD>WRP 151 4001 <TD>Used on 1971-73 Capri RS-2600 race cars. These aluminum heads are extraordinarily rare, and similarly expensive. They will only work with the corresponding Weslake injection intake. Casting number is a Weslake code, not a Ford code. <TR><TD>2.8 non-smog <TD>2 <TD>3 <TD>74TM <TD>Used on 1974 US-spec Capri I. <TR><TD>2.8 smog <TD>2 <TD>3 <TD>75TM <TD>Used on 1976-77 US-spec Capri II. <TR><TD>2.8 European <TD>3 <TD>2 <TD>79TM <TD>Used on 1979-86 European-spec Capri III. <TR><TD>Swaymar <TD>3 <TD>3 <TD>79TM? <TD>A modification of the 2.8 European head, with the exhaust port "un-siamesed". <TR><TD>2.8 <TD>3 <TD>3 <TD>85TM <TD>Used in Sierra XR 4x4 and Scorpio=(Granada MK3 in UK) , circa 1986-87 <TR><TD>2.9 (early) <TD>3 <TD>3 <TD>86TM <TD>Used on 1986-1992 Ford Rangers and Ford Bronco IIs. <TR><TD>2.9 (Scorpio) <TD>3 <TD>3 <TD>86TM <TD>Used on 1989 Ford (Merkur) Scorpios <TR><TD>2.9 (late) <TD>2 <TD>3 <TD>89TM <TD>Used on mid 1988-1992 Ford Rangers and Ford Bronco IIs. <TR><TD>2.9 Cosworth DOHC <TD><TD><TD>? <TD>Used on a few European Ford Scorpios. Many people have wondered whether these DOHC heads could be fitted to a 4.0 block. Sven Pruett has done it, and apparently he even made it work fairly well, but it took an enormous amount of effort to get it to work. Cosworth has also apparently done it with the FBD and FBF engines, but I don't know if these ever made it into production. <TR><TD>4.0 OHV <TD>3 <TD>3 <TD>90TM <TD>Used on Ford Rangers and Explorers. <TR><TD>4.0 OHV <TD>3 <TD>3 <TD>93TM <TD>Used on Ford Rangers and Explorers. Similar to 90TM, but said to be a stronger casting. <TR><TD>4.0 OHV <TD>3 <TD>3 <TD>95TM <TD>Used on Ford Rangers and Explorers. The first of the "Small chamber" heads. Smooth intake port, old style exhaust port. <TR><TD>4.0 OHV <TD>3 <TD>3 <TD>98TM <TD>Used on Ford Rangers and Explorers. A refinement of the 95TM head, it has smooth intake ports, small chambers, and round exhaust ports. <TR><TD>4.0 SOHC <TD>3 <TD>3 <TD>97JM <TD>Single overhead cam version of the 4.0, Used on Ford Rangers, Explorers, and 2005 Mustangs. </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
 
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2007 | 08:31 AM
  #2  
TigerDan's Avatar
TigerDan
Hotshot
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 12,170
Likes: 5
From: The hills of No. Calif.
Club FTE Gold Member
The exhaust ports on the 98TM heads are narrower than they were on the earlier castings. According to the engineers who designed these heads, the smaller ports increased the velocity of the exhaust gasses so they carried more heat down to the catalytic converter which would help the converter “light off" sooner to burn cleaner. With that in mind, it’s probably not a good idea to swap these heads with any of the earlier castings. Also, I think you have a change in the compression ratio due to the smaller chambers, possibly higher than you'd want. A better bet would be the 93TM castings.
 
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2007 | 10:40 PM
  #3  
rocker_topper's Avatar
rocker_topper
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
my goal is to raise the compression ration to about 12:1 but you say these heads will not work on my truck???
 
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2007 | 11:17 PM
  #4  
TigerDan's Avatar
TigerDan
Hotshot
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 12,170
Likes: 5
From: The hills of No. Calif.
Club FTE Gold Member
Not if you wanted to keep your truck in stock or near-stock configuration...but what are your goals with the truck? 12:1 is pretty high compression for a street driven truck. You wouldn't be able to run it on pump gas, that's race fuel territory.
 
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2007 | 09:45 PM
  #5  
rocker_topper's Avatar
rocker_topper
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
my idea is to get the compression ratio as high as i can and imgoing to be runnine 98 octane fuel.... um i want to bump the horsepower up to near 200... the motor stock has like 155 i believe and ive already got the heads off so i figure doign this and running the higher octane fuel should bump me up tosomewhere around 200.... unless you know an easier cheaper way to do this.... cause with the other heads i think i would have tochange my exhaust manifolds out correct?? and mabey my intake??? im not sure... anyways let me know what you think.
 
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2007 | 03:22 AM
  #6  
96_4wdr's Avatar
96_4wdr
Post Fiend
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,720
Likes: 5
From: Washington state
you'll never get the weak 4L OHV head to live long at 12:1 compression

drop in a late model 4.0L OHC/tranny and PCM
will gain 75 hp and 50 lbs/ft torque with mods
 

Last edited by 96_4wdr; Aug 29, 2007 at 03:25 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
51dueller
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
112
Jan 23, 2025 04:08 PM
TA455HO
1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
28
Mar 9, 2021 03:50 PM
AbandonedBronco
Ford Inline Six, 200, 250, 4.9L / 300
14
Mar 3, 2015 08:10 PM
morrisjl2
General Diesel Discussion
5
Apr 30, 2009 03:00 PM
indebt
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
7
Nov 7, 2008 09:29 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:18 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

Slideshow: Top 10 Fords at 2026 Ford Nationals

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-09 11:10:08


VIEW MORE
story-1
3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

Based on years of owning multiple modern Ford products.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-09 10:53:36


VIEW MORE
story-2
10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

SPONSORED: From muddy boots to rain-soaked cargo, these upgrades address some of the most common frustrations Ford truck owners face every day.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-06-08 18:50:34


VIEW MORE
story-3
Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

Here's everything you need to know about every Ford engine available for the 2026 model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-05 12:58:01


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-5
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-6
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-9
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE