Turbo Replacement
I know d*mn well the exhaust brake hasn't caused any damage its the poor turbo design.
Any kind of warranty the manufacturer always tries to wiggle out of it some how.
If you have the 06E17 recall the program will cycle the VGT through a specific range to mitigate the sticking issue, which may explain "acted up for a few minutes and started running fine"
If you want to stop quickly, enable the T/H mode. It will decelerate your truck much faster and, other than depressing the button, it doesn't require any user intervention.
I use it during stop-and-go traffic situations as well, and not just for hauling or towing. It keeps the transmission from shifting through the gears and when you need to quickly merger into the other lane the transmission is in the proper gear and the turbo is already spooled up.
If you have the 06E17 recall the program will cycle the VGT through a specific range to mitigate the sticking issue, which may explain "acted up for a few minutes and started running fine"
If you want to stop quickly, enable the T/H mode. It will decelerate your truck much faster and, other than depressing the button, it doesn't require any user intervention.
I use it during stop-and-go traffic situations as well, and not just for hauling or towing. It keeps the transmission from shifting through the gears and when you need to quickly merger into the other lane the transmission is in the proper gear and the turbo is already spooled up.
If the exhaust brake is causing the failure what is causing the thousands of other similar turbo failures out there that have no exhaust brake on???
In my case I have kept my engine and truck bone stock, and I drive it everyday too-and-from work, so it never was parked for an extended time for the vanes to corrode and stick, but I live and work 10 miles from the ocean, so perhaps the enviroment played a role in the sticking issue, and on the weekends I towed my 12k # toy hauler to our favorite spot.
I also frequently drive to the Colorado River during the summer, where it's typically either bone dry or high humidity monsoon conditions.
Most of the posts I have read on this topic are the results of extended non-use condition resulting in corroded vanes.
What has been your assesment on this issue?
In my case I have kept my engine and truck bone stock, and I drive it everyday too-and-from work, so it never was parked for an extended time for the vanes to corrode and stick, but I live and work 10 miles from the ocean, so perhaps the enviroment played a role in the sticking issue, and on the weekends I towed my 12k # toy hauler to our favorite spot.
I also frequently drive to the Colorado River during the summer, where it's typically either bone dry or high humidity monsoon conditions.
Most of the posts I have read on this topic are the results of extended non-use condition resulting in corroded vanes.
What has been your assesment on this issue?
Lets put this poll up and see what results we get?
https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/6...lacements.html
So what you are saying is that the turbo on your 50K truck is now a serviceable item that should be serviced every year or so??? What about the retired and unable who do not have the capacity to even change their oil, are they supposed to pull the turbo off and clean it periodically???
I apologize for playing the devils advocate on this topic but I am blown away by the loyalty you Ford owners have to the Ford Motor Company that is sitting on all your money they made from a commonly known poor design that is now discontinued???
I have seen the video instruction that describes the cleaning procedure, and like you said if a tech has another new turbo readily available it doesn't take much mental powers to solve that problem.
My neighbor, that lives down the street, has an 03 FX4 Lariat that's been raised 10" and programmed, and he only uses it to tow his toy hauler once a month or so, and he hasn't had the turbo replaced.
I find it hard to believe that the enviroment has a key role in failures of VGT type turbos, but there's no argument that living by the ocean will decrease the life span of metals.
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Lets put this poll up and see what results we get?
https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/6...lacements.html
"Twelve services bays, of which 2 are dedicated to Fords with the 6.0L, and 95% of all 6.0 failures are the result of turbo and head gasket failures"
Questions: on the jobs with the head gasket failures, what percentage of these truck had been chipped or re-programmed?
Of the failed turbos, how many of these jobs were using an aftermarket air filter.
What types of jobs and vehicles are you performing on the other 10 service bays? Don't get me wrong, but I'm curious if they are Cummings or Duramax. All have there problems too.
BTW...according to our resident forum 6.0 diesel ASE certified FTE member you can replace the head bolts without lifting the cab.
Last edited by glm racers; Aug 16, 2007 at 01:47 PM.
I apologize for playing the devils advocate on this topic but I am blown away by the loyalty you Ford owners have to the Ford Motor Company that is sitting on all your money they made from a commonly known poor design that is now discontinued???
And I have read that the Garret design VGT has been in operations long before the 6.0 was introduced.
We can debate the "my design is beter than yours" all you want, but let's stay on track and keep it real by providing facts with data and not suppositions.
"Twelve services bays, of which 2 are dedicated to Fords with the 6.0L, and 95% of all 6.0 failures are the result of turbo and head gasket failures"
Questions: on the jobs with the head gasket failures, what percentage of these truck had been chipped or re-programmed?
Of the failed turbos, how many of these jobs were using an aftermarket air filte.
What types of jobs and vehicles are you performing on the other 10 service bays? Don't get me wrong, but I'm curious if they are Cummings or Duramax. All have there problems too.
BTW...according to our resident forum 6.0 diesel ASE certified FTE member you can replace the head bolts without lifting the cab.
As for the other 10 bays they are doing general repairs, service and BD installs on 5.9 cummins 6.6 and 6.5 Chevy and 7.3L P/S, not dedicated to one specific truck like the 6.0L.
Lets have our resident 6.0L tech chime in and explain the proceedure for removing ALL the head studs without removing or lifting the cab. We would sure like to know how this is done as we could pass this savings on to our customers.
And I have read that the Garret design VGT has been in operations long before the 6.0 was introduced.
We can debate the "my design is beter than yours" all you want, but let's stay on track and keep it real by providing facts with data and not suppositions.
Last edited by dave at BD Power; Aug 16, 2007 at 02:04 PM.
Evidently your customers are requesting studs, which are superior than bolts. This will require the removal of the cab to have sufficient clearance to install the studs and then the heads, which will void the 5/100 warranty depending on the dealers judgement.
Have you tried installing studs by placing them in the heads while installing the heads/studs as one assembly??
Using one data point i.e. "2 and 3 for one guy" are called outliers and are not used in the analysis.
This is not to say the this member has not had his turbo replaced more than two times, and these data points, again if there are at least 30 individuals with more than 2 turbos repalced, can be used as another set of population for analysis.
For example: if one member has had the dealer replaced the turbo more than once then the null hypothesis would be defined. Measurements can then be made to further analyze the data, example: was it the same dealer that performed the job?
This can mean several things: 1) not all viewers own 6.0, and 2) there are 55 six-oh owners that have not had problems with their VGT
Stay tune for more.
Last edited by glm racers; Aug 16, 2007 at 03:46 PM.







