When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
well, they key word is it was strapped to his side, not in his hand and ponted at anyone.
we went rountinly when i lived in WA state out shooting, no one freaked when they saw us with guns and pulled out their gun and started shooting.
Good point 250, but also,
Different situations call for different measures. That is why having a CCWP is to be taken serious. Outcomes may not always be the way we expect them to be. In this thread, the situation could have been read one of many different ways. No one knows for 100 % certainty , the intent of an armed person walking up to them....
Unless they know them, or the armed person is wearing a badged uniform, they would have to be mind readers to know that armed persons intent. And with our radios , TV's, papers headlined everyday with the senseless slaughters being done to innocents, only the unarmed person in the OT situation, can be the judge of how to read it. jmo
Last edited by Greg 79 f150; Oct 22, 2006 at 12:47 PM.
Greg 79 f150 - i agree, its hard to knnow the intent of anyone walking up to you. and it is defintly more amplified if a weapon of some sort is showing or if the outer appearance of the person is "quesionable" i know i am more of the overly cautious paranoid mind when it comes to people.
just like one day in WA, my jeep broke down when we went out shooting so here we are, my friend and i, walking down the state highway in the evening almost dark with about 5 guns between both of us. 3 rifles and 2 pistols, we covered up the rifles with our jackets so it wouldn't freak anyone out.
we were hitch hiking back to my house and some guy actually stopped for us after about 1 1/2 hour of walking, we told him up front about the guns we had and we were carrying them so as not to leave them untintended in the broke down car. he gave us a ride!
As a kid raised in the backwoods of KY ,me and my buddy (from age 10) were almost always packing some kind of gun/s down the road across the valleys and hills. All the neighbors knew we respected their property and the guns we carried. That was 43 years ago...
Having a gun in public now gets looked upon with a very different viewpoint. I wish it was still like it was 40 years ago. Back then,people around your hometown for the most part could be trusted, not anymore. Too many transients , so you never really get to know them like I did as a kid. People were born, raised and died within 10 miles of the same home, back then.
Last edited by Greg 79 f150; Oct 22, 2006 at 01:06 PM.
thats why i like canada, really never have to worry about the person comming up to you or walking in the store is some whacked criminal or not. so nay less criminal minded poeple in canada.
imagine how nice some place like florida...or even all of america would be if we had staistics like that!
heck with it...i am relocating! now all i have to do is figure out how to keep the winters from being so cold!
I visited a city in a neighboring state, and my wife needed to stop at the local mall for a gift certificate. When we walked up to the main entance, I spotted a sign that said no firearms were allowed inside the mall. Now my question to you: If you were planning to rob somebody at gunpoint, where would be a good place to do it??? How stupid is it going to get, before people realize that not being allowed to posess firearms, makes you that much more likely to be a victim of one?!!!
First, as a CCWP holder, this was the WRONG attitude. The only thing lucky about you is that you don't look like swiss cheese. Should have aimed for mass and sorted out the details later. There was no question here, no doubt, and no reason you shouldn't have aimed to kill.
Second, what are you doing carrying a weapon in the open? Thing is, that guy saw you coming a mile away, and he already knew you had a gun. He already had the advantage. If you had killed or worse, injured him, you would be living in a tent.
Im glad you are OK, and im not here to argue semantics over what could have/should have been done. I just know i would have reacted different.
Dam...you are a lucky dude. Someone was on your side.
Last edited by ag-ford-4x4; Oct 23, 2006 at 12:35 PM.
Around here it use to be that if someone broke into your house the only way you could "legally" shot them was if, "you had exausted all means of escape". Now I don't know how you guys feel about it but if someone is in my house in the middle of the night without being invited, they are the ones who need to worry about escaping! I have heard that a new law was recently pass that allowes you to "defend yourself" in this situation. Personaly I always figured on defending myself, law or no law.
Interesting read. However, what those numbers in the second link DON'T show is 1) how much those numbers are DOWN in the U.S. due to more states allowing the licensed carry of handguns and 2) a differentiation between the rates in states where one can carry and states where the right to bear has been infringed. A decidedly anti-gunner went about studying the crime rates with regards to the right to carry laws in various states, and became a strong proponent of the right to carry. His name? John Lott, and he wrote "More Guns, Less Crime." (I have yet to read it, but I hear it's good, and it's on my "list").
Hey, sorry I didn't get back to this thread. Good input, and as usual, you all have good input, even some I didn't want to hear, but needed to hear. I didn't get back, because something else jumped up to bit me on the butt. (See next thread)
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.