Notices
1994.5 - 1997 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel  

MAP mod *update*

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 29, 2006 | 03:08 PM
  #1  
pud's Avatar
pud
Thread Starter
|
Posting Guru
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
From: Quesnel, BC, Canada
MAP mod *update*

I figured I would start a new thread on this one, if anyone read my last MAP sensor mod thread, they're more likely to read this one.

I have concluded that the extra power comes from the MAP sensor itself. I used the one out of my 1990 5.0L bronco. The PSD and Bronco ones are different, I put the PSD one in my 5.0L F150 and it would not start no matter what.
So I decided to try the Bronco sensor without the ghetto rigg q-tip bushing in it, and it made more power than the origional PSD MAP. The 2 are also different looking if you compare them side by side.

After determining the bronco map itself was the reason for the performance increase, I decided to put the Q-tip bushing back in the port to see if it made any difference. I think it did, but its hard to tell. Im keeping it in there anyways.
So if you have a Ford fuel injected gasoline vehicle with a MAP sensor, pull it off and try it out on your PSD. Id like to hear someone elses experience with this.

p.s. I just filled up so I am watching my mileage to see if there was a drastic change.
-Al
 
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2006 | 03:21 PM
  #2  
Cuda_jim's Avatar
Cuda_jim
Post Fiend
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,903
Likes: 1
From: MICHIGAN
Just wondering how a map sensor from a gas rig (Reads vacuum) could work on a PSD (reads pressure). hmmm interesting tho.
 
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2006 | 03:24 PM
  #3  
DAVID'S97F250HD's Avatar
DAVID'S97F250HD
Posting Guru
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,034
Likes: 0
OK, so you just install a Map sensor from a bronco?? what part number are you using thats on the sensor?
 
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2006 | 03:25 PM
  #4  
pud's Avatar
pud
Thread Starter
|
Posting Guru
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
From: Quesnel, BC, Canada
I dont know either, Im puzzled.
But with the gas rig, the more vacuum it senses the less fuel it sends, and vice-versa. So at 0" vacuum there would be more fuel delivered than if it were reading 17" vacuum. Same (in theory) applies to if it were reading boost, instead of vacuum. Thats the only logical way I can see it, ignoring the fact that I think the sensor just senses and the computer makes the changes.
That said, the diesel map wont run my gas rig.....wheres the head scratching smiley?
edit: give me 2 seconds Ill go pull the PN off it.
 
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2006 | 03:33 PM
  #5  
pud's Avatar
pud
Thread Starter
|
Posting Guru
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
From: Quesnel, BC, Canada
Bronco MAP PN= E7EF9F479A1A
Under that there is another #, 9 H-25 D The '9' is above the port, the works across. This # is below the PN....no idea what it is, but posted it anyway.
 
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2006 | 04:37 PM
  #6  
DAVID'S97F250HD's Avatar
DAVID'S97F250HD
Posting Guru
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,034
Likes: 0
wounder if its possible to use a map sensor off an SVO mustang, those 4 cylinder turbocharged stangs

Regardless, if it works it works, I'll have to match the #number upto some of the MAPS I have in the back
 
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2006 | 04:59 PM
  #7  
pud's Avatar
pud
Thread Starter
|
Posting Guru
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
From: Quesnel, BC, Canada
yeah if you have one give it a whirl.....I'd like to hear how it goes from someone else. My truck is stock, except I cut the cat, and now the Bronco MAP sensor. Do you have any mods?
 
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2006 | 06:38 AM
  #8  
DAVID'S97F250HD's Avatar
DAVID'S97F250HD
Posting Guru
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,034
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by pud
yeah if you have one give it a whirl.....I'd like to hear how it goes from someone else. My truck is stock, except I cut the cat, and now the Bronco MAP sensor. Do you have any mods?
SHIMMED fpr, gutted cat, K&N
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Aug 30, 2006 | 11:22 AM
  #9  
tjbeggs's Avatar
tjbeggs
Post Fiend
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 12,835
Likes: 3
From: Silver Lake Dunes, MI
Club FTE Silver Member

i tried one in my 95 PSD from a 93 f-150 5.0 seemed like it had a bit more low end but missed/cutout above 2500. no smoke and a check engine light. the two sensors were physically the same other than the PSD one was gray and the other black. but you said yours was different so maybe thats the key. tried to check all the data with our scanner but lunch time was too short at work and since it wasn't running right i didn't want to play with it anymore.
 
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2006 | 12:34 PM
  #10  
DAVID'S97F250HD's Avatar
DAVID'S97F250HD
Posting Guru
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,034
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by tjbeggs
i tried one in my 95 PSD from a 93 f-150 5.0 seemed like it had a bit more low end but missed/cutout above 2500. no smoke and a check engine light. the two sensors were physically the same other than the PSD one was gray and the other black. but you said yours was different so maybe thats the key. tried to check all the data with our scanner but lunch time was too short at work and since it wasn't running right i didn't want to play with it anymore.
Thats why I asked for the part #, I'm going to go search the local junkyard for one as the ones in my back field is not the same.
 
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2006 | 12:48 PM
  #11  
DAVID'S97F250HD's Avatar
DAVID'S97F250HD
Posting Guru
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,034
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by tjbeggs
i tried one in my 95 PSD from a 93 f-150 5.0 seemed like it had a bit more low end but missed/cutout above 2500. no smoke and a check engine light. the two sensors were physically the same other than the PSD one was gray and the other black. but you said yours was different so maybe thats the key. tried to check all the data with our scanner but lunch time was too short at work and since it wasn't running right i didn't want to play with it anymore.
Nevermind, I checked your truck to a 90 bronco on aldata, according to that these viechles should have the same MAP sensor.
 
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2006 | 01:32 PM
  #12  
pud's Avatar
pud
Thread Starter
|
Posting Guru
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
From: Quesnel, BC, Canada
on a flat surface mine starts to miss around 3000rpm, which it never sees anyways. On a hill its more around 2800 rpm. I dont even take it up that high either. I had a feeling it probably wouldnt turn out to well for anyone else. It might work better for Dave, since his truck is closer to stock than tjbeggs'. All I know for sure is, for my driving style it definately made a difference.

OT, what did you guys use to shim your FPR. On Baz's site is only says a 3/16" spacer, is that the BB one?
 
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2006 | 04:24 PM
  #13  
DAVID'S97F250HD's Avatar
DAVID'S97F250HD
Posting Guru
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,034
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by pud

OT, what did you guys use to shim your FPR. On Baz's site is only says a 3/16" spacer, is that the BB one?
3/16th BB, I just dropped a cotter pin in their and used the head of the pin, really anything will work if you got a fuel gauge to check your presures. Otherwise stick to the 3/16 BB
 
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2006 | 05:06 PM
  #14  
pud's Avatar
pud
Thread Starter
|
Posting Guru
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
From: Quesnel, BC, Canada
ill stick to the BB....
 
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2006 | 05:15 PM
  #15  
lukecline's Avatar
lukecline
Posting Guru
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 0
From: minneapolis, ks
if your original map sensor was bad that would explain the hp increase when the bronco map is installed.... If i read the post above right and providing they are in fact both the same part number. On my truck i unplugged the boost line from the map and experienced low power. Plugged boost line back in and then unplugged elec connection and truck went into a very aggressive shifting pattern and yet still ran pretty good. The map controls more than just the fueling tables it also is involved in some of the tranny functions. I cooked a tranny due to a map boost line being blocked (faulty boost regulator) and the trans line pressure not getting raised like it should cusing the tc to slip and take everything else out with it. I had a few mods when i cooked the tranny but becareful when playing with map sensor, its possible to damage your tranny.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:16 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE