2.9 Mpg
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
2.9 Mpg
Im looking at getting a 1990 supercab shortbox ranger as a back and forth beater. Its a 5 speed manual not sure on the ratio but what kind of mileage will it get out of it? i have my f150 for hauling heavy loads and i drive with a light foot.
Hotshot
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 12,170
Likes: 5
From: The hills of No. Calif.
Mine's an '89 Supercab formerly 2.9. I had the A4ld auto with non-functioning O/D and a few problems, usually got around 14-17 combined. I also tend to be a bit of a leadfoot, so that doesn't help.
A five-speed in good shape should get more like 18-21, possibly a little higher for straight highway driving.
A five-speed in good shape should get more like 18-21, possibly a little higher for straight highway driving.
Postmaster
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,516
Likes: 1
From: SoCal
After swapping everything to synthetic lube (engine/trans/diff)
my 87/2.9/5 speed/2WD/3.45 gears gets about 26 MPG cruising at 70 MPH.
The syn fluids bumped it up about 1 MPG.
my 87/2.9/5 speed/2WD/3.45 gears gets about 26 MPG cruising at 70 MPH.
The syn fluids bumped it up about 1 MPG.
Last edited by 87 XLT; Apr 25, 2006 at 11:34 AM.
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Hopefully i could get a little bit better than 17 mpg cause i get that with my f150 with the 4.9 and a five speed. Well at least the ranger im going to buy is gonna be really cheap for the shape its in.
VT Chapter Ldr
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 96,087
Likes: 294
From: Orange, Vermont
A few years ago I had an 88, same as what you are looking at but I don't know what the axel ratio was, and I would get pretty consistently low 20's mpg. On long trips where the speeds were 50-60mph I could get 25-26 mpg. I would check the level of the antifreeze because 2.9's like to crack heads and check the hydralic clutch resevior and look for leaks around bottom of the bell housing. if the slave cylinder is bad, it is kind of a pain to change because you need to pull the transmission to get at it. If the price is right and mileage good, I think it would make a good truck.
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
The only issues that it has is a little tick while its running and one of the valve covers leaks just a touch of oil. The AC doesnt work anyway so im gonna take that belt off and the coolant was still full even though it sat for 2 years before my friend got it.
Trending Topics
VT Chapter Ldr
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 96,087
Likes: 294
From: Orange, Vermont
my 88 had a tick also but ran good. taking the ac out of the loop will help with mileage a little also.
FTE Stories
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make
Brett Foote
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!
Michael S. Palmer
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home
Verdad Gallardo
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!
Joe Kucinski
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?
Brett Foote
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!
Michael S. Palmer
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!
Joe Kucinski
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026
Brett Foote
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time
Joe Kucinski
Freshman User
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
In my 88 bronco II with a 2.9L i got anywhere from 16mpg (making a lot of short trips) to 25mpg (on a long highway run) It usually averaged around 19-21mpg. Oh yeah, check every part of the cooling system, before you decide to buy it, my 2.9L eventually died of cracked heads.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
scottddove
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
2
Jul 11, 2006 11:56 AM
