Notices

302 flywheel confusion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 29, 2008 | 02:29 PM
  #16  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 785
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by justshootme84
The casting number is 100% definitely D90E-8015-E3A. I also thought that '6015' was the standard Engine Id series number. We did find a tag while cleaning the engine stating that it is a reman. from Ford dated 1993. So that would explain the 50 oz flexplate/ flywheel issue. Thanks for all the help, JSM84
It's 6015. Every bare block casting number from day one to today is 6015.

The die that Ford used was worn, why it appears to be 8015.

All the engine related parts are in the 6000 group. 6009-shortblock / 6200-rod / 6375-flywheel / 6500-lifter / 6600-oil pump, etc.

All the cooling related parts are in the 8000 group. 8005-radiator / 8200-grille / 8575-thermostat / 8600-fan blade, etc.
 
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2008 | 10:51 PM
  #17  
Systems2000's Avatar
Systems2000
New User
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
My Swap Project

I'm looking to pull the dead 300-6 out of my '87 F-150 4x4 and put in a 302 V-8. The 302 supposedly came from a vehicle with an Automatic and it was EFI, where my '87 was NA.

There is plenty of good information that I'm able to take away from this thread about flywheel weight and size. I also noted the comment about the starter.

I've already purchased the new motor mounts and I'm looking to acquire an intake/carb combo from the local JY. Is there anything additional that I'm missing or that I need to address?
 
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2008 | 11:29 PM
  #18  
Systems2000's Avatar
Systems2000
New User
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Until yesterday, I don't believe I've ever heard of the Flywheel on an automatic transmission being called a Flexplate. Is there any difference between a Flywheel on a manual transmission and a Flexplate on an automatic transmission? Can I use a Flexplate as a Flywheel?
 
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2008 | 12:35 AM
  #19  
Beanscoot's Avatar
Beanscoot
Cargo Master
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,071
Likes: 36
From: British Columbia
There's most definitely a difference between a flexplate and a flywheel. A flywheel has to have a clutch friction surface, attachment for the pressure plate and has to be heavy to act as a, um, flywheel.

A flexplate is merely a plate which attaches a torque converter to the crankshaft flange. It doesn't need mass since the torque converter acts as the flywheel.

Both pieces have a similar pattern to attach them to the crankshaft flange, and a ring gear to engage the starter motor, but are quite different (bolt pattern) otherwise to suit their intended purposes.

If you look through the posts on the first page of this thread you will see excellent illustrations of both parts.

Don't forget that the 300 and 302 flexplates or flywheels are differently balanced so not interchangeable.

 
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2008 | 09:46 AM
  #20  
TigerDan's Avatar
TigerDan
Hotshot
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 12,170
Likes: 5
From: The hills of No. Calif.
Club FTE Gold Member
Many people use the two terms interchangeably, not realizing the difference. Sometimes it's hard to read a thread and understand which of them it is that they're talking about, but I think we've covered them all in this thread.

And for the record, the difference on a 300-6 flywheel/flexplate is that it has zero imbalance, with no weights at all but still retains the same bolt pattern as our V8 engines which adds yet another level of possible imbalance mismatch...
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2009 | 06:50 PM
  #21  
Ford Boi's Avatar
Ford Boi
5th Gear
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
ive been reading all kinds of threads, and this one seems to be the most relevant. therefore i have a question to anyone regarding my 1988 F-250 302. the flywheel appears to be a 28oz. version, casting number E8TR-AA, so its an '88 casting . but, the front dampener appears to be the 50oz. weight, also , i checked my old automatic '86 302 and the flexplate appears to be 28oz. and the dampener is also the 50oz. weight.i am convertig the 88from the light duty ford 5 spd over t the heavy duty ZF. im curious why the flywheel is a 28oz. anyway. im just wondering if anybody can help clear it up.
 

Last edited by Ford Boi; Nov 19, 2009 at 06:53 PM. Reason: forgot to mention details.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2009 | 07:47 AM
  #22  
black58's Avatar
black58
Elder User
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 576
Likes: 9
From: Rockford, IL
Originally Posted by Ford Boi
ive been reading all kinds of threads, and this one seems to be the most relevant. therefore i have a question to anyone regarding my 1988 F-250 302. the flywheel appears to be a 28oz. version, casting number E8TR-AA, so its an '88 casting . but, the front dampener appears to be the 50oz. weight, also , i checked my old automatic '86 302 and the flexplate appears to be 28oz. and the dampener is also the 50oz. weight.i am convertig the 88from the light duty ford 5 spd over t the heavy duty ZF. im curious why the flywheel is a 28oz. anyway. im just wondering if anybody can help clear it up.
Well, I'm no guru, but I will ask you one question. Were/are either one of these engines running? If so, I would guess that you have 50oz flexplate/flywheel. If not, I would guess that maybe someone, somewhere pulled the old switcharoo.

I do have a question myself. I have three flexplates hanging from my wall in my garage, I have long forgotten the weight, but can easily count the number of teeth. If I'm understanding correctly, will the lighter balanced flexplates have more holes in them? (less material than the heavier variation)
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2009 | 08:42 AM
  #23  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
The flexplate/flywheel imbalance is engine dependant. The 351/5.8 has always used a 28oz imbalance, while the 302/5.0 switched from a 28oz to 50oz imbalance in 1981. So if that E8TR-AA(1988) flywheel is indeed 28oz it is from a 5.8 and is wrong for this motor, the other possibility of course is it's a 50oz flywheel.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-3

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-5

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-9

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
Old Nov 20, 2009 | 10:11 AM
  #24  
Ford Boi's Avatar
Ford Boi
5th Gear
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
yes the engines were both running, quite smoothly i must say. the 88 that i am working on now with the flywheel in question, i only bought recently and im sure it has been apart, the flywheel has been sanded down with a grinder and sanding pad , and is scored horribly and even cracked on the wear surface. it ran very well, no vibration, but i just want to make sure hat the proper flywheel goes back in. heres a piture of the E8TR-AA.
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2009 | 09:58 PM
  #25  
Beanscoot's Avatar
Beanscoot
Cargo Master
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,071
Likes: 36
From: British Columbia
Refer to posts #2 and #9 in this thread, there are pictures of 28 and 50 oz-in flywheels. The picture you just posted looks like a 28 oz-in version.
 
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2009 | 10:34 PM
  #26  
6fifty_f1fifty's Avatar
6fifty_f1fifty
Elder User
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 922
Likes: 1
From: San Diego
I am a bit of a nimrod, I was in the process of replacing my clutch, I removed the flywheel to have it re-surfaced, but I neglected to mark its position relative to the crankshaft. How do I ensure I re-install it correctly, is it's orientation going to matter?
 
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2009 | 11:01 PM
  #27  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
All the bolt holes will only line up in 1 orientation, you'll see this when you go to put it on.
 
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2009 | 12:34 AM
  #28  
6fifty_f1fifty's Avatar
6fifty_f1fifty
Elder User
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 922
Likes: 1
From: San Diego
I thought all of the flywheel mounting bolts were evenly spaced., I know that the clutch housing is oddly spaced and thus easy to line up, but I am a little worried about the flywheel itself.

I haven't gotten to that point, I was just able to get the worn pilot bearing out before it got too cold outside...

I will be throwing it all back together tomorrow (hopefully...)
 
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2009 | 11:29 PM
  #29  
Beanscoot's Avatar
Beanscoot
Cargo Master
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,071
Likes: 36
From: British Columbia
Flywheel alignment

Have no fear, one of the bolt holes in the flywheel is offset slightly as is one of the crankshaft threaded holes. Since it's only a little bit offset, it's not apparent when looking at one part, but when you put them together you'll see that the holes clearly don't line up enough to get all the bolts in unless the parts are in the one correct orientation.
 
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2009 | 12:13 PM
  #30  
6fifty_f1fifty's Avatar
6fifty_f1fifty
Elder User
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 922
Likes: 1
From: San Diego
Thanks, I figured it out late last night. one pair of holes was an inch apart, most of the others were just over an inch apart to a inch and a quarter apart...

Looks the same when viewed straight on. Go figure.

She's up and running now, just have to set the clutch linkage freeplay now.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:39 PM.

story-0
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-30 18:33:59


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-2
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-4
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-5
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-6
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-8
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-9
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE