Lifetime Air Filter - NO
ochoada
New User Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1
Here is the link to the reference described above, although the test was on a filter for a diesel truck.
http://home.usadatanet.net/~jbplock/ISO5011/SPICER.htm
You can also search AC Delco vs K&N on google and you will fine the article
The above is from the F150 forum. This pointer applies and is a good comparison.
thanks
ochoada
New User Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1
Here is the link to the reference described above, although the test was on a filter for a diesel truck.
http://home.usadatanet.net/~jbplock/ISO5011/SPICER.htm
You can also search AC Delco vs K&N on google and you will fine the article
The above is from the F150 forum. This pointer applies and is a good comparison. 
Dear Customer,
The filter test conducted by Testand comparing the K&N Filter to many other original equipment and replacement filters is flawed in several aspects. First, using data published in their test report, the efficiencies calculated for all of the filters tested are correct, with the exception of the K&N filter. Using their data, the efficiency of the K&N filter would calculate out to be higher than the published efficiency in the report. This raises an issue of credibility. Also, the protocol that is outlined does not follow the industry standard for air filter testing. K&N, routinely, has air filter testing performed by a nationally recognized, independent research laboratory and these independent tests report a substantially higher efficiency than the testand report.
I have read K&N's own inhouse testing and am not impressed. I want to read about more than cfm flow rate data. How much dust/dirt gets through the filter? How long will it maintain maximun filtering efficiency? How heavy a load of particulates will it carry before air flow restriction below engine requirements? Particulate size and filtering efficiency graph at maximum rated air flow.
It's like the car manuf.'s horsepower claims of the '60s & '70s. Advertisement value only put out by marketing, not sound engineering principles and testing based upon real science.
Last edited by 96_4wdr; Aug 2, 2005 at 08:02 PM.
Butt, down the road when you are having MAF, O2s, Cats, plugs issues, don't blame me. Stick with Motorcraft Filters and you will not have these issues. Check any Ford Board and you will see the same issues poping up when people use oil'd filters.
To address an earlier comment. These are not the same filters as the oil bath models of 50 years ago.
Ed, I'll check out the site. I'm open to other opinions.
VanGo, beleive it or not, I was going to buy a K&N (or similar) air filter for my van (KN # 33-2024) but for some reason or another, I never did. When I heard this issue discussed Sunday morning on Doug Brauner's radio show. www.carczar.com I had no idea about the MAF issue. Also, Doug is a certifed technician and sees these things in a close-up, auto repair shop envioroment. If you were interested, I would be happy to make a casette tape of his radio show, so you could hear it for yourself as an auto enthuiasist. However, I don't think we're allowed to post our e-mail addresses on this site? Ed
PS I am going to tape this Sunday's show anyway, in case their is further discussion on this topic.
I have read K&N's own inhouse testing and am not impressed. I want to read about more than cfm flow rate data. How much dust/dirt gets through the filter? How long will it maintain maximun filtering efficiency? How heavy a load of particulates will it carry before air flow restriction below engine requirements? Particulate size and filtering efficiency graph at maximum rated air flow.
It's like the car manuf.'s horsepower claims of the '60s & '70s. Advertisement value only put out by marketing, not sound engineering principles and testing based upon real science.
Check out the discription in K&N's OWN website. Notice the statement about "will stop small dirt particles":
http://www.knfilters.com/wraps.htm
Last edited by Bob Ayers; Aug 3, 2005 at 05:38 AM.
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
We need some independent test data to confirm.
I'm basically lazy when it comes to auto work and hate anymore to get greasy and dirty. I'll let someone else clean and oil one of these, my eye sight is no longer good enough to measure out 1.17 oz of their special oil.
I remember a great horsepower trick for the old Chev small blocks. Pull out the air filter donut and flip the filter lid over, really screamed at high rpms, increased air flow.
Sounded like the engine had a 6v71 Jimmy blower hid under the hood or a F104 Starfighter on takeoff. Might have to do some adjustments to get just the perfect air flow whistle.
Last edited by 96_4wdr; Aug 3, 2005 at 06:32 AM.
Brings back old memories!!!! I remember reading an article about flipping the air cleaner lid over, and the testing done indicated ther was a reduction in power, due to air turbulance into the carb. But, back then it was the "cool" thing to do.....making a lot more noise!!!
Last edited by Bob Ayers; Aug 3, 2005 at 06:24 AM.
gas mileage, $0.35 a gal, what was that.
If you want power increase the first simple formula is to improve airflow on exhaust and intake. (My old Chevy and Plymouth did improve on the 1/4 mile ETs (elapse times) at the track by flipping the intake and even better when I removed the filter completely) Neither of these engines even thought to see 200K miles and beyond.
If you want to improve your engine life keep the contaminants out and improve both internal and external engine cleaning habits & products.
By the way most test results can be skewed to make a certain point like any other set of gathered statistics. It is all in the eye of the beholder.
Last edited by EBTDM; Aug 3, 2005 at 07:18 AM.




